3rd Dec 2022

Legal action looms after MEPs back 'green' nuclear and gas

  • The taxonomy also split member states — with Austria and Luxembourg being the most outspoken opponent of including nuclear energy in the plan (Photo: European Parliament)
Listen to article

The European Parliament on Wednesday (6 July) adopted the European Commission's proposal to include certain gas and nuclear investments in the EU sustainable finance plan — after failing to secure a majority to object to the plans.

The decision has sparked criticism from green, socialists and left-wing MEPs and the climate community.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

But the fate of the so-called EU taxonomy is still unclear, as environmentalists , lawyers, some MEPs and various member states are threatening to legally challenge the commission proposal.

"This is such a controversial and a bad decision that now you will be seeing countries going to court with good legal arguments," green Dutch MEP Bas Eickhout told EUobserver after the key in a plenary in Strasbourg.

The taxonomy is designed to provide certainty in financial markets, steering investments away from companies and investors which falsely claim to be environmentally sustainable and driving additional private financing into renewables.

However, according to Eickhout, the insecurity remains for investors because court cases will emerge from this decision.

"Investors will refrain from using this taxonomy as long as there is this legal uncertainty hanging above the market," he said.

For their part, leftwing MEPs said they will legally challenge the decision, dubbed a "betrayal" — an idea which was also mooted by S&D lawmakers ahead of the vote.

"The parliament will definitely try to go to court ... We will argue that it goes against the primary legislation and we're definitely going to fight for that," Dutch socialist MEP Paul Tang told reporters in Brussels last week.

Yet, the parliament would need a majority to launch legal action against the commission — and the final result of Wednesday's vote on the objection to the taxonomy indicates that such a majority would be unlikely, Eickhout also said.

At least 353 EU lawmakers (out of a total of 705 MEPs) had to support the objection to kill the proposal.

But the text was rejected with 328 votes against, 278 votes in favour and 33 abstentions.

Vienna and Luxembourg

The taxonomy has also split member states, with Austria and Luxembourg being the most outspoken opponent of including nuclear energy in the plan, ever since it was presented — controversially — on New Year's eve 2021.

"Austria and Luxembourg will press legal charges and the court will rule about its legality," said Luxembourg minister for energy Claude Turmes, deploring the vote result.

Luxembourg is preparing to join a legal action to be initiated by Austria, the country clarified later in a statement.

Other countries like Denmark and Spain have said that the inclusion of gas and nuclear would undermine the credibility of the whole taxonomy.

Immediately after the vote, environmental campaigners including Greenpeace and ClientEarth said they will submit a formal request for internal review to the commission and pursue legal action if its result is negative. WWF also announced that it will explore "all potential avenues for further action".

"We will fight this in the courts … and are confident that the courts will strike down this politically-motivated greenwashing as clearly in breach of EU law," said Ariadna Rodrigo from Greenpeace.

Treaty clashes?

Lawyers from London-based nonprofit ClientEarth found last year that the classification of gas and nuclear as green in the EU taxonomy would clash with several EU laws — the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the EU Climate Law and the Taxonomy Regulation itself — and international commitments under the 2015 Paris Agreement.

Czech prime minister Petr Fiala urged MEPs not to block the proposal ahead of the vote.

"This is a very fragile and balanced proposal, which allows a number of countries to meet their climate targets only thanks to criteria presented in the proposal," he said during a plenary debate.

The European Commission, for its part, welcomed the vote results, arguing that this is a "pragmatic and realistic" approach to help EU member states in the transition away from fossil fuels.

EU member states are divided over the role of nuclear and gas in the transition towards climate neutrality. Gas infrastructure still generates significant greenhouse gas emissions and managing radioactive waste can be costly and problematic.

The taxonomy guidelines, however, do not ban investments in activities not included in the guidelines

The vote is considered a victory for France, which generates the majority of its power from nuclear power — and has been pushing for the inclusion of nuclear power in the taxonomy thanks to a coalition with pro-gas southern and eastern Europe governments.


Nuclear and gas in EU taxonomy slammed as 'greenwashing'

The EU's decision to include natural gas and nuclear power as "transitional activities" in its sustainable investments guidelines for green finance continues to generate massive controversy. Critics call it the "biggest greenwash ever."

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP27: Food systems transformation for climate action
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region and the African Union urge the COP27 to talk about gender equality
  3. International Sustainable Finance CentreJoin CEE Sustainable Finance Summit, 15 – 19 May 2023, high-level event for finance & business
  4. Friedrich Naumann Foundation European DialogueGender x Geopolitics: Shaping an Inclusive Foreign Security Policy for Europe
  5. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe
  6. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos

Latest News

  1. EU must break Orbán's veto on a tax rate for multinationals
  2. Belarus dictator's family loves EU luxuries, flight data shows
  3. How Berlin and Paris sold-out the EU corporate due diligence law
  4. Turkey's EU-funded detention centres ripe with abuse: NGO
  5. In green subsidy race, EU should not imitate US
  6. EU Commission proposes suspending billions to Hungary
  7. EU: Russian assets to be returned in case of peace treaty
  8. Frontex leadership candidates grilled by MEPs

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Committee of the RegionsRe-Watch EURegions Week 2022
  2. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”
  4. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  6. European Centre for Press and Media FreedomEuropean Anti-SLAPP Conference 2022

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us