Thursday

6th Oct 2022

EU member states fear scholarship tourism

  • The ruling will have implications for the EU member states' grant systems for education (Photo: European Commission)

As more and more young Europeans study in member states other than their own, this has serious implications for how governments manage their social assistance for students.

Next month, in a keenly awaited opinion, the European Court of Justice, will give a preliminary answer to a key question: To what extent do foreign students have the right to be treated equally to national students.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The answer - the Advocate General's opinion is generally followed in the final judgement by the court - is set to a large extent to determine whether member states can continue with generous educational grants and whether they can prevent what is known as scholarship tourism.

The particular case concerns a German student Jaqueline Foerster who went to study in the Netherlands in 2000.

Ms Foerster did the minimum number of hours of work in order to be eligible for a Dutch grant - one of the criteria in the Netherlands is that foreign students need to work. But the Dutch scholarship board, which initially granted the student aid to her, in 2005 demanded a partial refund because Ms Foerster had not worked in the second half of 2003.

The German student took the case to court saying the move was discriminatory as Dutch students do not have to work. The court's opinion is due on 10 July and has member states worrying about whether they will be able to protect their expensive grant schemes from foreign students.

In a sign of the interest in the case, a court hearing was attended by the German, British, Belgian, Swedish and Finnish governments.

An EU official noted that at the hearing the court appeared to be "conscious of the implications of a wide-ranging ruling that would set a precedent."

He added that it was felt at the hearing that the court would try and issue a judgement that was "specific" to the case bearing in mind the "large financial implications" for member states.

Not the first case

This is not the first case in this area but has arisen from a European court judgement of 2005 on a similar question.

The 2005 case concerned French student Dany Bidar studying in the UK who had gone to court because he was refused a normal UK student scholarship.

The court found in his favour that students who "have demonstrated a certain degree of integration into the society of that State" should have the same rights as national students.

Member states took this judgement to mean that foreign students should have lived in a country for five years to be entitled to the same treatment as national students.

The Foerster case opens the same questions about the extent to which nationals can be favoured over foreigners because the Dutch government is arguing that it had a right to set the minimum work criteria because the effects of the Bidar case had not yet come into force.

EU education law and tensions elsewhere

Brussels has few specific rights in the area of education under EU law. Article 149 of the treaty states that the EU action "shall contribute to the development of quality education by encouraging cooperation between Member States."

But although education large remains a – jealously guarded – domain of member states, the court has potentially large scope. It is using both the anti-discrimination article in the treaty, which prevents, among other things, discrimination on the grounds of nationality and is upholding the rights of every EU citizen to freedom of movement within the bloc.

In another case involving education between Germany and Austria, the court ruled that Austria was breaching EU law by setting restrictions on foreigners wanting to study medicine and dentistry in the country. The limit was targeted at German students who came in droves to Austria to study at its medical schools but returned to Germany afterwards to practise.

Similar tensions can be seen in Belgium concerning French students. The French-speaking part of the country in 2006 adopted quotas for nine separate areas, including medicine and veterinary studies fearing, like Austria, that its public health system would otherwise be undermined.

For the moment, Brussels has taken a wait and see attitude. Last year it granted both countries five years to accumulate data so they can justify whether the restrictive steps they took were "necessary" and "proportionate."

EU adopts common charger law, forces iPhone redesign

The days of pilling up obsolete chargers in drawers and groping around to find the correct one are coming to an end. MEPs adopted new rules forcing all phone manufacturers to offer a common charging solution by autumn 2024.

Deregulation of new GMO crops: science or business?

Academics and biotech research organisations with corporate interests have been leading the lobby campaign to deregulate new genomic techniques in the EU — using 'climate-friendly' and 'science-based' narratives, according to a report.

Netherlands tops EU social safety net for the poor

The Netherlands is the only EU state where the minimum income is above the poverty line. A minimum income is not a wage but rather a social safety net to ensure people do not end up destitute.

EU Commission issues winter Covid warning

Although cases are dropping, the European Commission has warned that Covid spikes may occur during the autumn and winter months. "The Covid-19 pandemic is still very much with us" EU health commissioner Stella Kyriakides said, killing 2,300 Europeans daily.

News in Brief

  1. Sweden: Nord Stream probe points to 'gross sabotage'
  2. Orbán rails against Russia sanctions at Prague summit
  3. MEPs urge inquiry into Mahsa Amini killing and Iran sanctions
  4. Thousands of Hungarian students and teachers protest
  5. Swedish MEP cuts hair mid-speech to support Iran women
  6. Danish general election called for 1 November
  7. Slovenia legalises gay marriage, adoption
  8. Russia's stand-in EU ambassador reprimanded on Ukraine

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe
  2. The European Association for Storage of EnergyRegister for the Energy Storage Global Conference, held in Brussels on 11-13 Oct.
  3. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  4. European Committee of the RegionsThe 20th edition of EURegionsWeek is ready to take off. Save your spot in Brussels.
  5. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”

Latest News

  1. What actually happened at the 'most complicated election in the world'?
  2. Europe lays aside quarrels to isolate Putin
  3. Spyware-hacked MEPs still seeking answers
  4. EU leaders discuss gas price cap — amid rationing fear
  5. Germany braces for criticism of national €200bn energy fund
  6. The fossil-fuel agenda behind EU's carbon-capture plans
  7. Four weeks to COP27 — key issues and challenges
  8. EU wants to see US list on Russia financing of politicians

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  3. European Centre for Press and Media FreedomEuropean Anti-SLAPP Conference 2022
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  6. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us