Thursday

18th Apr 2019

Commission 'solution' to lawmaking deadlock stalled

  • A committee in the House of Commons has asked the UK government to be 'highly engaged' with the proposal, to ensure the comitology process will suit the UK's interests post-Brexit (Photo: House of Commons)

The European Commission's proposal to change rules on direct lawmaking in the EU has so far been met with silence or outright opposition.

In an attempt to let national governments take political ownership of controversial decisions, like on authorising genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the commission proposed in February to modify the so-called 'comitology' rules.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

  • The French senate is worried that the Commission's plan will be 'inconsistent' with the EU treaties (Photo: Sénat)

Comitology is not very well-known outside EU circles, but has become a common way in Brussels to make legislation through committees with experts from member states.

On Monday (27 November) one such committee made the highly-controversial decision to renew the licence for the weedkiller glyphosate - after 18 months of discussion and stalled votes because too many states had previously abstained.

Often when GMOs are up for approval, roughly a third of member states vote in favour, a third against, and a third abstain, leading to an outcome known as 'no opinion'. This is then often repeated in the appeal committee.

To increase the likelihood of member states reaching an actual stand – and to prevent the commission from bearing the full responsibility of the final decision – the commission proposed that in the appeal committee abstentions no longer count when calculating a qualified majority in sensitive cases.

Commission spokeswoman Mina Andreeva on Tuesday (28 November) did not go into detail about the file's lack of support, but said the EU's executive was working towards a "solution".

But 288 days after the commission's publication of the proposal, it has barely been discussed in the two EU institutions that need to approve it: the European Parliament and the Council of the EU.

Czech, French and British scepticism

The council represents the governments of the EU's 28 member states. Several of those member states are critical of the proposal.

On 19 October, the committee of European affairs in the French senate said that it considered "the modification of the calculating rules on qualified majority as inconsistent with the [EU] treaties".

Some months earlier, the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic expressed both "concern" and "doubts" about the proposal.

Polish senators even issued a "negative opinion" on the proposal, saying the plan would introduce a "systemic change".

The plan "upsets the institutional balance", according to the Foreign and European Union Affairs Committee of the Polish senate.

Meanwhile in London, the UK government has asked the Commission to provide evidence that the plan "would not disproportionately add bureaucracy and delay to an already complex system".

London is also "unconvinced" by the Commission's argument that an impact assessment of the proposal was not needed, a concern also raised by Czech MPs.

Brexit

The UK's relation to this file is however different than that of the 27 EU member states who will remain a member of the bloc.

The House of Commons has asked the UK government to be "highly engaged" with the proposal "in order to influence the best outcome for the UK as a future third country".

The MPs "think it possible that some significant aspects of the UK's future relationship with the EU, whether in terms of trade or other cooperation, could be implemented through the comitology process".

They added it was "quite possible" that after March 2019 the UK "might want to align UK law with EU implementing legislation".

"The crucial question therefore for the government is whether the post-Brexit interests of the UK would be better served by the current comitology processes (which it considers to be evidence-based) or the reforms (which involve more member state input and which it thinks will have a politicising effect)," MPs said.

Parliament

The European Parliament also needs to agree to the proposal before it can become law.

The parliament has its own qualms with the comitology process, in particular with a legal activity called the 'implementing act'. These are adopted without any role for MEPs.

Six parliament committees will give an opinion about the proposal before amendments are proposed to the lead committee of legal affairs.

So far, one opinion has been adopted, last week, by the economic and monetary affairs committee.

The committee took the opportunity to introduce amendments to the text to increase the role of the EU Parliament, asking for more transparency and "full access" to the comitology register.

More of such amendments can be expected, which will make it difficult for the commission to keep the scope of the proposal "targeted and limited".

Glyphosate

In its proposal, the commission said that the change of voting rules in the appeal committee was needed because the outcome was often the same as in the original committee.

But the glyphosate case this week was evidence to the contrary.

The appeals committee adopted the commission's proposal to renew the substance's licence for a period of five years, with only Portugal abstaining.

In a previous vote, four states, including Germany, abstained. This time however, in a twist which is now reverberating in German politics, the EU's largest state voted in favour of renewal. Ignoring abstentions was not required to break the deadlock.

Brussels wants EU states to share flak for GMO approvals

European Commission proposes changes to the little-known but often used comitology procedure, which results in deadlocks whenever controversial issues like genetically modified organisms are on the table.

GMO opt-out plan remains in waiting room

The commission wants to give the power to member states to reject EU-approved genetically modified organisms, but the Maltese presidency is unlikely to approach the issue any time soon.

Magazine

The changing of the guards in the EU in 2019

The four most powerful EU institutions - Commission, Parliament, Council and Central Bank will all have new leaders in the coming ten months. Here is an overview.

Magazine

Explained: What is the European Parliament?

While domestic political parties often use the European Parliament as a dumping ground for unwanted politicians - and a majority of citizens don't bother to vote - the parliament, over the years, has become a dominant force in the EU.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  2. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  3. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  4. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  5. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  9. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  10. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  12. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan

Latest News

  1. Romania drafts EU code on NGO migrant rescues
  2. Bulgaria, Hungary, and Malta shamed on press unfreedom
  3. EU drafts $20bn US sanctions list in aviation dispute
  4. Brunei defends stoning to death of gay men in EU letter
  5. US Democrats side with Ireland on Brexit
  6. Wifi or 5G to connect EU cars? MEPs weigh in
  7. How Brexit may harm the new EU parliament
  8. EU parliament backs whistleblower law

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic talks on parental leave at the UN
  3. International Partnership for Human RightsTrial of Chechen prisoner of conscience and human rights activist Oyub Titiev continues.
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic food policy inspires India to be a sustainable superpower
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID
  6. Counter BalanceEU bank urged to free itself from fossil fuels and take climate leadership
  7. Intercultural Dialogue PlatformRoundtable: Muslim Heresy and the Politics of Human Rights, Dr. Matthew J. Nelson
  8. Platform for Peace and JusticeTurkey suffering from the lack of the rule of law
  9. UNESDASoft Drinks Europe welcomes Tim Brett as its new president
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers take the lead in combatting climate change
  11. Counter BalanceEuropean Parliament takes incoherent steps on climate in future EU investments
  12. International Partnership For Human RightsKyrgyz authorities have to immediately release human rights defender Azimjon Askarov

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us