Tuesday

30th May 2017

Opinion

Gaza: ‘Burning the consciousness’

  • Yehuda Shaul: Israel picks defensive names for its international audience (Photo: Quique Kierszenbaum)

In November 2012, Israel launched a military operation in the Gaza Strip called "Amud Anan", the literal English translation of which is, "Pillar of Clouds". Though, the official name in English was deemed, “Pillar of Defence”.

A few days ago we launched another operation named, "Mighty Cliff”, which is officially called, "Protective Edge".

Dear EUobserver reader

Subscribe now for unrestricted access to EUobserver.

Sign up for 30 days' free trial, no obligation. Full subscription only 15 € / month or 150 € / year.

  1. Unlimited access on desktop and mobile
  2. All premium articles, analysis, commentary and investigations
  3. EUobserver archives

EUobserver is the only independent news media covering EU affairs in Brussels and all 28 member states.

♡ We value your support.

If you already have an account click here to login.

Both chosen titles are highly defensive in their essence.

When I hear the names given to military operations in Gaza - especially the versions chosen for an international audience - I am reminded of my military service as a combatant in the Israeli army, whose full name (both in Hebrew and English) is: the “Israel Defence Forces” (IDF).

These days, I am reminded of the gap I discovered during my military service between the ethos represented by the name of the IDF, and the actual military operations that we carried out in the West Bank.

Officially, the task before us was defensive. We performed "preventative" operations, such as prevention of terrorism. But my friends and I learned that “prevention” was nothing but a code name for a bunch of actions, many of which were offensive operations in any case. Bogui Ya'alon, then chief of staff and today the defence minister, called on us to "burn the Palestinian consciousness".

In the spirit of this call, we were sent to intimidate and punish an entire civilian community systematically. This was grounded in the assumption that its members would refrain from revolting if they were hurt, oppressed and scared enough. Frightened consciousness is, in other words, "burned consciousness”.

In order to "thwart", my friends and I learned to look at every Palestinian as an enemy and, as such, a legitimate target for attack. When we went on operations in order to “demonstrate our presence”, our objective was to frighten and confuse the civilian population in order to make them understand that they are always under our control.

We achieved this objective through patrols on city streets and through entering homes randomly, at all hours of the day and night. No actual intelligence information guided us during these operations.

Other times, we “prevented” terror through the collective punishment of innocent Palestinians. Such was the operation to which we were sent after a Palestinian murdered a little girl from the Adora settlement.

A few hours after the murder, we laid siege to the village of Tufach near the settlement of Adora. For an entire day we entered, one after the other, every single house in the village. We raided the houses and sent all the men in the village for questioning at the local school, which became our interrogation facility.

We did not find anything, but looking back, that was not the objective. Through mass arrests and invasion of the houses, we sowed fear and "punished” the community of Adora. The logic that guided us was that if we punish everyone now, they will be afraid to do something in the future.

The rocket fire from Gaza on Israeli civilians inside Israel is a terrible deed, which has no justification and should not be justified. It threatens the lives of men, women, and children in the entire country, and has even injured several citizens.

But the shooting of rockets does not turn all of the residents of Gaza into legitimate targets for mass destruction, just as the murder of the child should not have turned all of the residents of Tufach into legitimate targets for arrest and indiscriminate searches.

Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed thus far as a result of the Israeli attacks, most of them civilians. The UN reports that at least 342 houses have been destroyed.

On the first day of the operation, the attack on the Kwara family’s home (one of whose sons is a Hamas activist) killed eight family members who were in the house - six of whom were children.

In the name of defence, these days we are even attacking the civilian population under Israeli control throughout the year.

Even after the disengagement in 2005, we still control the airspace and territorial waters of Gaza, buffer zones inside the Gaza strip, and the movement of people and goods to and from Gaza - almost completely. Gaza's population registry is controlled by Israel, and in order to obtain an ID card at the age of 16, Israel’s approval is required.

This is just the tip of the iceberg, of course.

One of the characteristics of such control is seen in periodic military operations, causing terrible damage not only to the para-military infrastructure, but also to civilians, men, women and children that live in Gaza.

This reality was not forced upon us. It is the product of choices made by our leadership every day, to maintain control over the Palestinian territories and the population that resides there. I know the consequences of this choice well, because as a soldier and commander I took part in its implementation.

I learned that the preservation of such control requires the constant exercise of force. I learned that is impossible to forcefully enforce a foreign government’s rule on a population of millions of people for decades, ethically.

Designating the repeated attacks on Gaza with defensive names will not change the nature of the operations.

Significant change will come only on the day the occupation ends. In truth, it is difficult to know whether the threat to southern Israeli towns and communities will cease if the occupation ends.

Though we do know that the occupation has not ceased thus far, and if nothing changes, we are all condemned to undergo another bloody operation, similar to the current one, in a year or two.

Semantics will not change this reality, in which Israel is not only defending itself but also attacking - not only during these difficult days, but every day.

Instead of trying to explain and justify it, we must act to change it. These are the days when we have to say: it's time to end the occupation.

The writer served as an infantry combat soldier and commander in the IDF, and is a founding member of Breaking the Silence, an Israeli NGO

Nato needs a European 2%

Europe needs to take care of its on security, but not on Trump's terms, with the 2 percent of GDP mantra flawed as a model.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Centre Maurits CoppietersWhat's Going on in Catalonia? Join the Debate on 8 June
  2. Swedish EnterprisesDo We Need a More Social Europe? A Lively Debate Awaits You on 7 June
  3. Centre Maurits CoppietersDiscover the Role of Feminism in the Peripheries of Europe on 9 June
  4. Malta EU 2017EU Group Launched to Focus on Priorities and Policies Concerning Children
  5. UNICEFChild Alert on Myanmar: Fruits of Rapid Development yet to Reach Remote Regions
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersBecome an Explorer - 'Traces of Nordic' Seeking Storytellers Around the World
  7. European Healthy Lifestyle AllianceHigh-Intensity Interval Training Is Therapeutic Option for Type 2 Diabetes
  8. Malta EU 2017Closer Cooperation and Reinforced Solidarity to Ensure Security of Gas Supply
  9. Dialogue Platform"The West Must Help Turkey Return to a Democratic Path" a Call by Fethullah Gulen
  10. ILGA-EuropeRainbow Europe 2017 Is Live - Which Countries Are Leading on LGBTI Equality?
  11. Centre Maurits CoppietersWhen You Invest in a Refugee Woman You Help the Whole Community
  12. Eurogroup for AnimalsECJ Ruling: Member States Given No Say on Wildlife Protection In Trade

Latest News

  1. Nouvelles suspicions sur le groupe de Le Pen au Parlement européen
  2. EU sets out demands on post-Brexit people's rights
  3. IT security system risks EU fundamental rights
  4. Macron and Putin hold uneasy first talks
  5. From Greece to Scotland, we stand by Europe
  6. Juncker keen to build EU 'bridge' to Trump
  7. Ministers water down post-Dieselgate reform
  8. Club de combat: des espions russes recherchent des recrues européennes

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Heart NetworkCall for Urgent Adoption of EU-Wide Nutrient Profiles for Nutrition & Health Claims
  2. Counter BalanceInvestment Plan for Europe More Climate Friendly but European Parliament Shows Little Ambition
  3. Mission of China to the EUPresident Xi: China's Belt and Road Initiative Benefits People Around the World
  4. Malta EU 2017EU Strengthens Control of the Acquisition and Possession of Firearms
  5. International Partnership for Human RightsThe Cost of Speaking Out: Human Rights Violations Committed in Belarus
  6. ACCABanishing Bias? Audit, Objectivity and the Value of Professional Scepticism
  7. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Oslo Climate Declaration Focuses on Rising Temperatures in the Arctic
  8. European Healthy Lifestyle AllianceAbdominal Obesity: A Causal Risk Factor for Cardiometabolic Diseases
  9. EU Green Week 2017Discuss EU Environmental Policies With Industry Experts and Thought Leaders
  10. GEN Summit 2017Join the World's Leading Media Summit for Thought-Provoking Talks and Experiences
  11. International Partnership for Human RightsTogether for Human Rights: A Year in Review
  12. Malta EU 2017EU All Set for Free Roaming Starting 15 June