Wednesday

14th Apr 2021

Opinion

Albania references mark new low in Brexit debate

The way the EU referendum campaign has been unfolding, leaving apart the wisdom of holding such a referendum at all, reveals trouble in the state of British politics.

The political elite is handling the question of Britain’s place in Europe with nonchalance and recklessness.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Instead of substance and pragmatism, we are getting hyperbole and empty slogans. Instead of focusing attention on the real issues and options, we get digressions and diversions and a healthy dose of xenophobia – especially towards Albania.

The strange appropriation of Albania, both by the Leave and Remain campaigns, exemplifies the sorry state of the debate.

It came to the fore when Leave campaigner Michael Gove spoke about Britain’s trade options after quitting the EU. He envisaged a free-trade zone that would include Balkan countries such as Albania.

In response, the Remain Campaign wasted no time in jumping on Albania to ridicule Gove’s plans.

It ran a mobile billboard depicting the Albanian flag flying from Buckingham Palace, with the sneering caption: “The Leave campaign want us to quit the Single Market and be like ‘Albania’. Seriously.”

For days it became the headline and hallmark of the Remain campaign’s presence on the social media.

It is fairly obvious that the message this slogan conveys is not meant for people who would have moral concerns about doing business with Albania. Quite the opposite. It targets those who would not like to be associated with Albania at all.

Hence, voting to leave Europe would not be just bad economics but also an affront to the British self-image and identity.

The irony is that Gove has also discovered the potential of using Albania as identity blackmail. He is telling people to get out of Europe precisely because one day Albania might become a member.

Reductionist approach

Beyond such gratuitous exploitation of xenophobia to stir up the mob and nudge it in two opposing directions, the derogatory portrayal of Albania demonstrates the poverty of the debate and a failure of both camps to make their case on merit or substance.

The disarray and hollowness of the Leave Campaign could hardly be any greater. Its capacity to come up with an alternative to Europe has not amounted to more than a list of countries ranked in no particular order, including Norway and Switzerland, Albania and Mexico or Canada, whose example Britain could follow and flourish outside Europe. They leave it to people’s imagination to figure out the details.

The Remain Campaign has not fared much better. Rather than offering a holistic and positive vision about the value of remaining in Europe, it has expended a great deal of energy reacting to flimsy proposals from the Leave Campaign or concentrating on the dire economic consequences of leaving Europe.

Its reductionist approach is a hallmark of poor imagination in capturing the manifold greatness of the European project as well as in addressing the multiple reasons of why some people fear and want to abandon it.

Most importantly, by having both sides rely on similar arguments and tactics, they deprive the voter of real alternatives. This defeats the purpose of having two “camps” in the debate in the first place.

This is not the sober, rational debate we should be having on whether Britain should stay in or leave Europe.

In such a momentous vote for both Britain and Europe, we need Britain to show us how a mature democracy can deliberate and decide.

Above all, we need to see the Britain of Magna Carta and of parliamentary sovereignty, and not of the mob, roused by vacuous or xenophobic slogans. Britain can do better than this; it owes it to itself and the world.

Gjovalin Macaj is a tutor and researcher in International Relations at St Antony’s College, University of Oxford.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Column / Brexit Briefing

Stereotypes abound in divided Britain

Remain or leave? As the EU question splits the British population down age, political leanings and education, neither side understands the motivation of the other.

Column / Brexit Briefing

How Cameron's EU referendum silenced left-wing Britain

Most of the passion in an increasingly bitter campaign ahead of the 23 June vote comes from the Conservatives. Mobilisation on the left and by nationalists remains marginal.

Interview

EU outshines Russia in Western Balkans

Russia cannot compete with the EU for attractiveness in the Western Balkans, but can play an 'obstructive' role, Albania's foreign minister said.

Column / Brexit Briefing

War, trade and project fear

While prime minister Cameron is scaring voters by saying Brexit could threaten peace in Europe, leaders of the campaign to leave the EU propose a dangerous leap into the unknown.

Industry lobby to 'co-decide' on nearly €10bn EU public money

Several industry EU lobby groups are about to be entrusted again with the privilege of co-deciding how €9.6bn of public EU research funding should be used - in research areas as essential as healthcare, transportation, energy and IT infrastructures.

News in Brief

  1. US officials call for J&J vaccine pause over blood clots
  2. Putin refuses to talk about military build-up, Ukraine says
  3. EU bank to help Greece manage corona-recovery funds
  4. Johnson & Johnson vaccine deliveries to EU begin
  5. EU sanctions commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guard
  6. UK opens investigation into ex-PM Cameron lobbying
  7. 'Significant differences' in EU-UK talks on Northern Ireland
  8. Bulgarian PM reveals price rise in new EU-BioNTech deal

Column

Why Germans understand the EU best

In Germany, there is commotion about a new book in which two journalists describe meetings held during the corona crisis between federal chancellor Angela Merkel, and the 16 prime ministers of its federal constituent states.

Why Iceland isn't the gender paradise you think

Iceland's international reputation masks two blunt realities that face the country's women - the disproportionate levels of gender-based violence that they experience, and a justice system that is frequently suspicious and hostile towards victims of this violence.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersDigitalisation can help us pick up the green pace
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCOVID19 is a wake-up call in the fight against antibiotic resistance
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region can and should play a leading role in Europe’s digital development
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council to host EU webinars on energy, digitalisation and antibiotic resistance
  5. UNESDAEU Code of Conduct can showcase PPPs delivering healthier more sustainable society
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersWomen benefit in the digitalised labour market

Latest News

  1. How the pandemic became an EU goldmine for crime
  2. China responds to 'low-efficacy' vaccine fears
  3. Merkel party chiefs support Laschet's chancellor bid
  4. EU refuses to bail out Montenegro's China loan
  5. Industry lobby to 'co-decide' on nearly €10bn EU public money
  6. Why Ursula von der Leyen won't go
  7. Incorporating gender in trade policy to benefit all
  8. Does Italian regionalism actually work?

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us