Tuesday

19th Nov 2019

Opinion

The revolving Brexit door

  • The first key point is that the status of the referendum is not clear. (Photo: Reuters)

It is understandable that the rest of Europe is angry with the UK.

Yet again the UK has vandalised the European project – this time in a spectacularly destructive manner, triggering unnecessary political and financial instability affecting everyone.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 year's of archives. 30-day free trial.

... or join as a group

As a UK national, I am sorry that our inept political establishment has caused this mess.

As an EU citizen I accept that ‘in is in’ and ‘out is out’ and the fundamentals of the membership rules cannot be changed.

But I would like our European friends to understand that many Britons do not think that the referendum outcome is sufficient for us to give up our European identity without a fight.

The UK remain camp will seek to delay and reverse the referendum outcome using all democratically legitimate means.

What concerns me now is that the EU27 and the European Parliament are behaving – at least publicly – as though the referendum means that Brexit is a fait accompli and appear to be hastily pushing the UK towards the exit door.

They want the UK to pull the formal leave trigger, Article 50 TEU, “as soon as possible”.

In the words of Macbeth, “If it were done - when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done quickly”.

While it may be in the EU27’s interest, it is neither in the interest of the UK remain camp nor the UK national interest to quickly trigger Article 50.

This may still be true in one, two or five years. As always, we need to find ways of uniting diverse interests.

The referendum is not clear

In asking for a quick pull of the Article 50 trigger, the EU27 ignore the UK’s constitutional arrangements. This is a mistake.

Article 50 stipulates “Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements”.

The first key point is that the status of the referendum is not clear.

Unlike the UK referendum of 2011, the legislation for the in-out EU referendum does not contain any information on the implementation of the result.

OK, it is obvious that, politically, it would be very hard to claim that it was merely consultative, but it does not automatically follow that it is legally binding.

The second key point is that the UK Parliament has a crucial role in deciding questions on withdrawal. This role is doubly important given the uncertain status of the referendum and the need to clarify if and how it is implemented.

Constitutional requirements

On the wider constitutional question, it should not be taken that just because the UK does not have a written constitution there are no constitutional requirements. There are, but they are opaque, complex and hard to navigate.

The most important fact to grasp is that the UK government cannot simply send a letter to the Council triggering the withdrawal process.

Because parliament is sovereign, the UK government requires parliamentary approval before triggering Article 50. This will involve both houses of Parliament and may involve devolved assemblies in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

It is also important to remember that only 158 out of 650 UK members of parliament publicly backed leaving the EU, while 475 others were for remain.

Even though the main political parties are in disarray, it should not be assumed that 170 MPs will compound the folly of the referendum outcome, ignore their convictions and meekly submit to the parliamentary minority.

If a law is required to implement the referendum result, it could be a substantial piece of legislation including clauses detailing the government’s negotiating mandate and allowing for a referendum on approving or rejecting the UK’s exit terms.

Failure to comply with the legal aspects of the Article 50 process now and in the future could lead to challenges in the UK and European Courts.

Status not changed...yet

Even if Article 50 is activated, until it formally leaves, the UK remains a full EU member, legally bound by EU law. Put simply its status has not changed.

Therefore, unless the UK does anything to materially breach its treaty obligations – frustrating as it would be for the other 27 – the UK can at any point in the 2-year exit negotiation process decide not to leave and retain its EU membership status.

Politics is about what is possible and as we go forward, anything is possible.

Between now and the UK’s exit, many other events could halt Brexit – one or more general elections, a groundswell of UK public opinion against exiting triggering a second referendum, no agreement on the withdrawal arrangements or a rejection by the UK Parliament or a referendum on the exit terms.

The Macbeth soliloquy mentioned above occurs in Act 1 scene 7 – but the play has 8 scenes in the fifth act.

Put simply, it is not over yet.

Paul O'Grady is Executive Director of Article21, co-founder of Democracy Reporting International and consults on elections and democracy for the OSCE and European Union.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Column / Brexit Briefing

Brexit plans missing in action

The Brexit referendum has created an almighty political and economic mess, with little sign of a British or EU plan to clean things up.

Leaders rule out treaty change to reform EU

EU leaders have discussed how to reform the union in the wake of Brexit, but the main faultlines will only be exposed in Bratislava in September. Treaty change remains taboo, for now.

EU leaders to seek clarity on Brexit date


EU leaders meeting in Brussels will discuss when the legal process for the UK exit from the EU could start, amid growing questions of whether it will happen at all.

Analysis

The week of the Tory long knives

Since last week’s fateful Brexit vote, Westminster has turned into Game of Thrones meets House of Cards.

News in Brief

  1. Hungary, Poland block EU conclusions on rule of law
  2. France: wide EU backing for enlargement change
  3. EU Council calls for policy action to protect marine life
  4. ECJ: Poland's judicial independence in doubt
  5. Suspected 'middleman' in Caruana Galizia case arrested
  6. European populists more favourable to Russia
  7. Hungary's new commissioner approved by MEPs
  8. Balkan coal power plants fail to meet emissions targets

'A game of roulette' - life as a journalist now in Turkey

Turkey has more journalists behind bars than any other country in the world. The authorities seem to equate journalism with terrorism: everyone has the right to express themselves, but, in their eyes, legitimate journalism is a threat to security.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Climate Action Weeks in December
  3. UNESDAUNESDA welcomes Nicholas Hodac as new Director General
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersBrussels welcomes Nordic culture
  5. UNESDAUNESDA appoints Nicholas Hodac as Director General
  6. UNESDASoft drinks industry co-signs Circular Plastics Alliance Declaration
  7. FEANIEngineers Europe Advisory Group: Building the engineers of the future
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNew programme studies infectious diseases and antibiotic resistance
  9. UNESDAUNESDA reduces added sugars 11.9% between 2015-2017
  10. International Partnership for Human RightsEU-Uzbekistan Human Rights Dialogue: EU to raise key fundamental rights issues
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNo evidence that social media are harmful to young people
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersCanada to host the joint Nordic cultural initiative 2021

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  3. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  4. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  5. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  6. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  11. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  12. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us