Wednesday

20th Nov 2019

Letter

MH17: Punishment without crime?

  • A memorial to the 298 victims of the July 2014 MH17 attack, in Donetsk, Ukraine (Photo: Jeroen Akkermans)

Last week a number of politicians and diplomats used the fifth anniversary of the MH17 flight tragedy as a pretext to renew attacks against Russia.

The level of absurd in these statements varied, but their aim was the same: try to cement in the minds of people the idea of Russia's guilt in this catastrophe notwithstanding any logic and law.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 year's of archives. 30-day free trial.

... or join as a group

It came as no surprise that the leaders in this shameful competition were representatives of the so-called "new Ukrainian political elite" (though in fact many of those people had been in high positions in Ukrainian politics years before the coup d'état in Kiev in 2014).

An extensive article by the Ukrainian ambassador Mykola Tochytskyi, published on EUobserver, is a typical example.

This official constantly assures that Ukraine and other Joint Investigation Team (JIT) members are committed to find out the truth, and addresses pathetic calls on Russia to unconditionally admit "its guilt" and cooperate with the JIT.

He also pragmatically uses this possibility to refresh some other well-known talking points of 'pro-Western' (though not always pro-Ukrainian) Kiev politicians.

Some of these mantras have been successfully tested by many of their 'Big Colleagues' in Europe and overseas, namely the thesis regarding "great and terrible Kremlin propaganda", the bulk of which has nothing in common with either disinformation or official Russian position.

But for some reason Tochytskyi forgot to note that it was Ukraine, not Russia, that refused to cooperate with the investigators and transfer its radar data in particular.

Moreover, as a UN Security Council member, Russia supported UN SC Resolution 2166, as it has always sought and will seek to facilitate constructive international efforts to clear up the circumstances of the tragedy.

The problem is that JIT members essentially refuse to take into consideration any facts that undermine the strategy determined on the very day of the crash, i.e. to blame Russians for everything.

At the same time, after almost five years of a "profound and comprehensive investigation" there are still many more questions than answers in the case. And one does not need to be an expert to raise them.

More questions

Why are the main JIT conclusions based on such doubtful sources as "independent" bloggers, social media, suspiciously low quality pictures and video, catchy digital imitations and indecipherable telephone interceptions records, provided by an obviously interested party?

Why was the Ukrainian affiliation of the missile presented by the JIT itself not taken into consideration?

Why are other numerous data, witnesses, experts conclusions, results of natural experiments, which are a priori impossible to falsify, declined with sometimes sincerely outspoken motivation that all this information contradicts the general line?

What is the essence of the mutual agreement between the JIT members not to publish any information unless it is approved by all of them, including Ukraine, whose interest in accusing Russia and Donbass republics is unambiguous?

Does such an approach contribute to transparency and independence of the investigation?

And among others, why was Malaysia, being the JIT member, the country of origin of the plane, the crew and many passengers, reluctant to hastily join 'the democratic world' in its blind crusader attack against Russia, noting numerous flaws of the investigators' work?

In the long run, is it normal being a JIT member to declare, that absence of evidence does not prove the lack of guilt, in fact mocking the cornerstone principles of the modern democratic society, which the Ukrainian ambassador praises with the same extent of diligence and insincerity?

What about respecting the famous presumption of innocence, numerous international documents, such as the European Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and others?

Finally, is it moral to make use of the MH17 victims' kin and beloveds' grief for political gaming?

All these and many other reasonable questions do not seem to bother Tochytskyi and, unfortunately, many Europeans.

Pretending willingness to establish the truth, they are only obsessed with the question "when will Russia be punished?".

Let me remind a simple and logical principle, illustrated more than a century ago by the brilliant Russian writer, Fyodor Dostoevsky: punishment is inevitable, when it is consequence of a committed and proven crime.

But the main question: who is behind the death of 298 people on board MH17 as well as other numerous crimes in Ukraine, especially against Russian-speaking peaceful Ukrainians in Kiev, Odessa, Donetsk and Lugansk right after the 2014 coup, cynically called "revolution of dignity", still remains unanswered.

And the only way to find the truth is through painstaking, professional and depoliticised investigation, answering many tough questions. That should be obvious to any really impartial Ukrainian, Russian or EU observer.

Author bio

Sergey Kovalevskiy is press attache of the Russian Mission to the EU.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU investment bank 'wide open to abuse by fraudsters'

Fundamental reforms are needed if the EIB is to become more accountable, democratic and transparent. Establishing a firm grasp on corruption to ensure that public money no longer feeds corrupt systems is a vital first step.

European beekeeping in crisis

Europe's bee population is dying. The number of pollinator species threatened by extinction is increasing each year, and human activity is the main cause.

Corruption in the Balkans: the elephant in the room

Over the years, both real and perceived levels of corruption in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia have remained high. The necessary reforms in those countries, to put it mildly, are not yet effectively carried out.

News in Brief

  1. Hungary, Poland block EU conclusions on rule of law
  2. France: wide EU backing for enlargement change
  3. EU Council calls for policy action to protect marine life
  4. ECJ: Poland's judicial independence in doubt
  5. Suspected 'middleman' in Caruana Galizia case arrested
  6. European populists more favourable to Russia
  7. Hungary's new commissioner approved by MEPs
  8. Balkan coal power plants fail to meet emissions targets

'A game of roulette' - life as a journalist now in Turkey

Turkey has more journalists behind bars than any other country in the world. The authorities seem to equate journalism with terrorism: everyone has the right to express themselves, but, in their eyes, legitimate journalism is a threat to security.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Climate Action Weeks in December
  3. UNESDAUNESDA welcomes Nicholas Hodac as new Director General
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersBrussels welcomes Nordic culture
  5. UNESDAUNESDA appoints Nicholas Hodac as Director General
  6. UNESDASoft drinks industry co-signs Circular Plastics Alliance Declaration
  7. FEANIEngineers Europe Advisory Group: Building the engineers of the future
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNew programme studies infectious diseases and antibiotic resistance
  9. UNESDAUNESDA reduces added sugars 11.9% between 2015-2017
  10. International Partnership for Human RightsEU-Uzbekistan Human Rights Dialogue: EU to raise key fundamental rights issues
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNo evidence that social media are harmful to young people
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersCanada to host the joint Nordic cultural initiative 2021

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  3. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  4. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  5. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  6. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  11. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  12. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us