Friday

23rd Oct 2020

Opinion

Why Poland couldn't sign up to Green New Deal

In her stirring speech to the European Parliament last week the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, presented the European Green Deal. She confirmed the earlier announcements about substantial upscaling of the EU climate targets for 2030 and 2050.

In a later press conference, she justified it as the "man-on-the-moon moment".

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

She underlined that we don't know yet all the answers on how to do it.

This month EU leaders have reached an agreement on achieving climate-neutrality by 2050 but with Poland opting-out of the target. For one member state, it is necessary to take more time to implement this objective.

What does this mean for Poland and the EU?

First of all, the European Green Deal is envisaged to have a transformative impact on the whole European economy as well lifestyle, including consumption habits.

Having in mind the central and eastern European legacy in terms of economic structure and especially energy mix, it is easy to understand that exceptions on the European Union's path leading to climate-neutrality must occur.

Concordantly, there is a fundamental issue which should be addressed, which is: how to conduct a reliable and inclusive plan resulting in achieving climate-neutrality in 2050 without any damage for the cohesion policy funds?

This is a fair question not only with regard to the total budget, but also to each of priorities envisaged in the commission agenda.

Von der Leyen says that there are going to be €100bn available to tackle this issue.

As much as it seems a generous plan, it does not necessarily have to be.

For instance, the current European Fund for Strategic Investment created by the European Investment Bank Group and the European Commission is to mobilise €500bn by 2020, with an own fund of €35bn (€26bn guarantee from the EU budget, complemented by a €7.5bn allocation of the EIB's own capital).

By analogy, this could mean that €100bn offered for the just transition by the EIB is to be raised by around €7bn which is only half of what was postulated earlier - and a fifth of what Jerzy Buzek, a former prime minister of Poland and current MEP proposed.

Consequently, it must be emphasised that the Just Transition Fund should be prepared meticulously – we need to know how the money is going to be spent, not only the rough amount.

Which projects?

Poland will have another couple of months to negotiate the shape of the financial tools which will enable the country not only to agree on the climate neutrality in June 2020, but also to make it real by 2050.

In this context, it is worth to be mentioned that even if the amount is higher than €7bn, a more important question is what kind of projects it is going to finance.

In the paper issued this year by the Polish Economic Institute our authors argue, that the real just transition needs to focus on those who will be hit the hardest by the coal transition costs.

However, neither the old commission, nor the new one, came up with a convincing solution to that issue.

The thermal insulation together with sustainable heating, which are claimed to be the best way to solve energy poverty, cannot be used the same way as before.

The efficiency logic of spending these funds was oriented on energy savings which are the easiest to achieve in multi-family buildings and the best way to distribute them was through preferential credits and loans.

In Poland however, energy poverty is largely a matter of detached houses and households with low credit scores.

This leads to the third question, which needs re-asking. Who will benefit the most?

The companies profiting vastly from the cohesion funds on energy efficiency are most likely large producers of technologies and materials. Economically-speaking this makes no sense as it rewards the most technologically advanced and competitive companies, which are big corporations.

However, if we take into account solidarity as the backbone of Europe, the idea of spurring growth in local communities is at its most crucial.

We need to help those regions and communities confronted with a coal phase-out. We need new jobs and new business in places like Silesia, Poland.

Central and eastern Europe member states are often labelled as ones focused primarily on money. Indeed, because we are the poor kid in the elite club of the EU.

We need to take into account the different state of economic and social development of each country, not to mention their varying energy systems.

We cannot put a climate muzzle on economic growth. The CEE businesses need to be included more in value chains of green technologies which are to answer the needs of the least wealthy among us.

If the current growth model is to be replaced by the one proposed by the European Commission the issues mentioned here need to be answered and all of these sophisticated interlinkages transferred into policy.

Climate neutrality, likened by von der Leyen herself to the moon expedition, has to be realised reliably, thinking about people and not just about the numbers.

If the European Union wants to succeed in this area, it should take into account that decarbonisation has to be a common and solidarity commitment and there will be no one left behind. Only solidarity will bring us to the right place.

Author bio

Piotr Arak is the head of the Polish Economic Institute, a public think tank in Warsaw.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Methane emissions will be test of EU's Green Deal

Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, is one area where the EU has a major opportunity to apply its market power to drive down global emissions, both through methane legislation and diplomacy.

Poland's rule of law defiance is an escalating crisis for EU

The PiS government is popular with part of the electorate for understandable reasons. It has provided significant support to families and is collecting taxes more systematically. Its stubborn fight against the rule of law has tarnished such achievements.

Can the Green Deal – and Europe – succeed?

We have invested €200bn in research and innovation since 1984, but have we achieved any leadership in quantum, semiconductors, storage, artificial intelligence? The simple answer is no.

News in Brief

  1. UK scientists fear Brexit blow to joint EU research
  2. Greek migrant camp lockdown extended
  3. Lukashenko and 14 others in EU crosshairs
  4. EU imposes sanctions over 2015 Bundestag cyberattack
  5. Italy reignites Mont Blanc border dispute with France
  6. Commission to press Croatia on migrant 'abuse' at border
  7. Belarus opposition awarded 2020 Sakharov Prize
  8. Belgium's foreign minister in intensive care for Covid-19

Europe has forgotten the 'farm' in 'Farm to Fork'

US secretary of agriculture Sonny Perdue argues that the EU is taking an approach "more based on 'political science' than demonstrated agricultural science" in its new Farm to Fork strategy.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking healthier diets the easy choice
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersUN Secretary General to meet with Nordic Council on COVID-19
  3. UNESDAWell-designed Deposit Return Schemes can help reach Single-Use Plastics Directive targets
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council meets Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tichanovskaja
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to invest DKK 250 million in green digitalised business sector
  6. UNESDAReducing packaging waste – a huge opportunity for circularity

Latest News

  1. South Caucasus death toll much worse than feared
  2. Polish court effectively bans legal abortions
  3. MEPs urge EU to be ready to dump disputed energy treaty
  4. EU commission on defensive over 'revolving doors'
  5. Why German presidency is wrong on rule of law
  6. Nato and EU silent on Turkey, despite Armenia's appeal
  7. EU tells UK to decide on Brexit as deal 'within reach'
  8. EU farming deal attacked by Green groups

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us