Monday

23rd May 2022

Opinion

Let's revisit why the EU only has three 'work' languages

  • If the EU is truly supposed to be promoting and respecting "linguistic diversity" then why are three official languages held in higher regard than the other 21? (Photo: EUobserver)
Listen to article

According to Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union, one of the EU's aims is to promote "linguistic diversity". Article 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights similarly states that the EU shall respect "linguistic diversity".

Yet, although the EU has 24 official languages, the European Commission conducts the majority of its business in English, French, or German.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Some EU institutions are even more restrictive. For instance, the European Central Bank works mainly in English, while the Court of Auditors and the Court of Justice work mainly in French.

If the EU is truly supposed to be promoting and respecting "linguistic diversity" then why are three official languages held in higher regard than the other 21?

One likely answer is simply because it's cheaper. Truly supporting all 24 languages equally would cost astronomically more than what the EU already spends on language support - which is a lot.

However, if costs are a concern, perhaps the EU should be using even fewer languages. In 2005, François Grin, a Swiss economist, estimated that the EU could save €25bn a year by adopting a single working language.

Perhaps this proposal seems contrary to the EU's alleged dedication to language pluralism, but the fact remains that among 24 official languages (plus many other European languages that don't have official status), only three are commonly used within EU institutions. This suggests that all of the talk of "linguistic diversity" is somewhat hollow.

Now that the UK has left the EU, France has made a push to promote the French language in the name of "multiculturalism." But for someone with no proficiency in either French or English, how is French any more multicultural than English?

Although this might be hard for some to hear, the reality is: French is never going to be the pre-eminent lingua franca. For the time being it is English, and it will probably remain as such, until someday perhaps Chinese becomes more widespread.

Brexit bonus?

The fact that there are now fewer native English speakers in the EU thanks to Brexit, actually strengthens the case for English, as its use within the EU requires that for most, it must be learned as a second language, which puts nearly everyone on the same linguistic playing field.

France clinging onto its own perceived exceptionalism within the EU will not stop the linguistic trends that are already taking place. Promoting French above the other working languages only truly serves to provide a bonus to those competent in French at the expense of all others. It also sets a bizarre precedent for changing the EU's de facto preferred working language every six months with the rotating of the presidency of the Council of the European Union.

The EU's language practices already aren't fair. But having multiple working languages that become more and less important depending upon who's in charge is unnecessarily expensive and no more 'diverse' for anyone whose first language isn't English, French, or German.

Instead of only fighting US tech companies with litigation, why not create and support local alternatives for local languages?

Why, for instance, isn't there a home-grown Finnish Facebook or a Gaelic Google? The same applies to the streaming wars: instead of just requiring that Netflix, Disney+, and others offer a minimum amount of European content, why not actively promote the creation of such content?

Invest in Spanish cinema, produce more Polish period pieces and Danish dramas. Britbox, which streams in the US, is owned, in part, by the BBC, the national broadcaster of the UK. Why isn't there an EU-supported Britbox-esque service that exclusively streams European content in European languages?

If, for the sake of stability and predictability, all EU institutions adopted a single working language, the substantial amount of money saved on translation services could be put to good use: such a protecting and preserving the many endangered languages of Europe. Then the EU truly would be promoting and respecting "linguistic diversity".

Author bio

Joshua Holzer is an assistant professor of political science at Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri. He is a former US Army analyst and studied Chinese at the Defense Language Institute.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Mayor breaks language divide in mixed Romanian city

The Romanian city of Sfântu Gheoghe plans to bridge the language gap between Hungarian and Romanian speakers by pioneering a programme to incentivise learning each other's languages.

English at risk as official EU language

Under current rules, English must be dropped when UK leaves a senior MEP said. Ireland or Malta could add it back in if EU law is changed.

Are Orban's Covid powers now the 'new normal' in Hungary?

As the world continues to seek productive ways to provide assistance to the beleaguered citizens of Ukraine, the Hungarian government is now using the humanitarian crisis to further its own authoritarian ambitions.

What Europe still needs to do to save its bees

On World Bee Day, it is essential to pay homage to a variety of pollinating insects crucial for our food security. A number of EU projects contribute to their sustained survival.

Will 'Putin's Nato' follow Warsaw Pact into obscurity?

Valdimir Putin's equivalent to Nato — the Collective Security Treaty Organization of Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Armenia, Tajikistan, and Belarus — is convening in Moscow next week to give cover that Russia is not alone in its war against Ukraine.

The EU Parliament Covid inquiry: the questions MEPs must ask

A basic lack of transparency around the EU's vaccines procurement negotiations has prevented effective public and parliamentary scrutiny. It has also made it impossible to answer some of the key questions we put forward here.

News in Brief

  1. Germany would back Russia oil embargo without Hungary
  2. UK to send 'hundreds' of migrants to Rwanda each year
  3. Norwegian knife attacks were domestic dispute
  4. Sweden hits back at Turkey's 'disinformation' in Nato bid
  5. Germany's Schröder gives up one of two Russia jobs
  6. G7 countries pledge €18bn in financial aid for Ukraine
  7. Italian unions strike in protest over military aid for Ukraine
  8. Russia cuts gas supply to Finland

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic delegation visits Nordic Bridges in Canada
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersClear to proceed - green shipping corridors in the Nordic Region
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers agree on international climate commitments
  4. UNESDA - SOFT DRINKS EUROPEEfficient waste collection schemes, closed-loop recycling and access to recycled content are crucial to transition to a circular economy in Europe
  5. UiPathNo digital future for the EU without Intelligent Automation? Online briefing Link

Latest News

  1. Are Orban's Covid powers now the 'new normal' in Hungary?
  2. Missing guns amid rising far-right hate in EU
  3. MEPs boycott trip after Israeli snub
  4. What Europe still needs to do to save its bees
  5. Remembering Falcone: How Italy almost became a narco-state
  6. Economic worries and Hungary on the spot Next WEEK
  7. MEPs urge sanctioning the likes of ex-chancellor Schröder
  8. MEPs call for a more forceful EU response to Kremlin gas cut

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us