Monday

4th Dec 2023

Opinion

It's time to open up the European Court of Justice

  • The ECJ seems to regard the transparency of judiciary as a costly, time-consuming and resource-intensive administrative burden — rather than an issue of open justice (Photo: Unsplash)
Listen to article

A lot of attention has been paid in recent years to how the European Union regulates different sectors, from renewable energy to digital markets and artificial intelligence. Much less has been given to a crucial tenet of democratic accountability — how the EU institutions regulate themselves.

The most recent example is the European Court of Justice/Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ). In stark contrast to several other regional courts, the EU court does not allow for public access to many of its key documents, including those about ongoing proceedings. This lack of transparency hinders accountability and undermines trust in EU institutions.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

A debate is currently ongoing about the wider reform of the statute of the EU court — presenting a unique opportunity to change that.

At present, the court considers documents about ongoing proceedings to be confidential and only makes them available once the proceedings have concluded and a decision has been pronounced. Arguments submitted by parties are never published — preventing the public from ever having a full picture on what has led the court to take a decision on a certain case.

Journalists blindsided

This has a huge impact on public watchdogs: journalists, for example, cannot report on the state of a given case while it is ongoing, leading to the lack of oversight of the court's workings.

This approach differs significantly from that of other courts.

For instance, the European Court of Human Rights follows a general and simple rule: every document that is deposited in its registrar is accessible to the public (any exceptions are dealt with by case by case basis, and are rare). In Canada, transparency of the judiciary is so fundamental it is enshrined in the constitution. In countries like the US, Finland and Slovenia, specific laws allow everyone to access documents held by the courts.

On the whole, the EU court seems to regard the transparency of judiciary as a costly, time-consuming and resource-intensive administrative burden — rather than an issue of open justice. The principle, rooted in the international human rights law, is a fundamental pillar of a well-functioning democracy.

ARTICLE 19, together with 18 European civil society organisations have called on the European Parliament to make this right.

Last month, the European Parliament's committee for legal affairs (JURI) unanimously voted to allow everyone to request access to documents held by the court. This position is now subject to quadrilogies, which continue at the start of November.

With public access to the court''s documents, everyone would be able to access the full range of documents about judicial proceedings, including case files, as well as data such as statistics on cases filed, resolved and pending, or the court's agenda.

This matters, in particular, as the role of the EU Court has greatly changed over the last few years: it is increasingly ruling on matters related to human rights, such as migration, privacy, health or the environment.

This expanded remit calls for greater external scrutiny. Journalists, researchers and civil society organisations should have a better sense of how the court comes to its decisions, be able to scrutinise them and report on proceedings as they are happening. Lawyers should also be able to look into the practices before the court so they can better prepare arguments and strategies by reviewing previous cases — benefiting everyone who turns to the ECJ to sort out disputes.

Maintaining the status quo fails to consider how it is in the court's own interest to allow EU citizens to better understand how it works.

Openness leads to more trust in institutions: EU taxpayers, whose money supports the structures of the court, should be able to ask how and what it is used for. Increased transparency would also incentivise court's judges to act as fairly, consistently, and impartially as possible. The motto 'judging the judge' is a crucial part of democratic checks and balances.

As negotiations continue in the coming weeks, the EU institutions should follow the important steps taken by the JURI committee and ensure that transparency remains a crucial aspect of the European Court of Justice's reform.

Access to documents might seem like an administrative and bureaucratic issue. In reality, it is about core democratic values and how the EU lives up to them.

Author bio

Ilaria Fevola is a lawyer, and legal officer at the London-based NGO ARTICLE 19 which campaigns for transparency and freedom of speech.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Why EU's €18m for Israel undermines peace

The optics of a nine-fold increase of annual funding for Israel, in the middle of its devastating military campaign in Gaza, stands in contrast with the attempted suspension, delaying and constraining of EU development aid for the Palestinians.

Why EU's €18m for Israel undermines peace

The optics of a nine-fold increase of annual funding for Israel, in the middle of its devastating military campaign in Gaza, stands in contrast with the attempted suspension, delaying and constraining of EU development aid for the Palestinians.

Dubai's COP28 — a view from the ground

Discussion of the biggest existential threat humanity has ever faced is barely mentioned on billboards or signage in Dubai — yet visitors are made aware quite quickly that t world rugby sevens tournament is imminent.

Latest News

  1. Afghanistan is a 'forever emergency,' says UN head
  2. EU public procurement reform 'ineffective', find auditors
  3. COP28 warned over-relying on carbon capture costs €27 trillion
  4. Optimising Alzheimer's disease health care pathways across Europe
  5. Georgian far-right leader laughs off potential EU sanctions
  6. The EU's U-turn on caged farm animals — explained
  7. EU-China summit and migration files in focus This WEEK
  8. COP28 debates climate finance amid inflated accounting 'mess'

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  3. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  4. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?
  5. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsThis autumn Europalia arts festival is all about GEORGIA!
  6. UNOPSFostering health system resilience in fragile and conflict-affected countries

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Citizen's InitiativeThe European Commission launches the ‘ImagineEU’ competition for secondary school students in the EU.
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region is stepping up its efforts to reduce food waste
  3. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  4. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersGlobal interest in the new Nordic Nutrition Recommendations – here are the speakers for the launch
  6. Nordic Council of Ministers20 June: Launch of the new Nordic Nutrition Recommendations

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us