Friday

14th Aug 2020

Opinion

The EU: reform or self destruct?

If the Irish were wondering whether they made the right decision by voting against the Lisbon Treaty, the reaction of the European political class confirms that they made the right call.

The Brussels response is simply to pretend that it never happened. Like people who have been brainwashed, they all say exactly the same thing.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • If we carry on like this the madmen in charge are going to blow the EU to bits. (Photo: IWRCampaign)

The French Europe Minister says "I don't think you can say the treaty of Lisbon is dead even if the ratification process will be delayed."

The German Foreign Minister says "we are sticking with our goal for it to come into force. The ratification process must continue.""

People who thought the treaty was dead, just because people had said no to it, were mistaken. The Irish no vote means nothing to the euro elite.

A full circle

The irony is that when the Irish voted against the Lisbon treaty last Thursday (12 June), a very long argument finally came full circle.

This whole business started when the Irish voted against the Nice treaty in 2001. In response the leaders of the European Union promised they would start to make the EU more democratic, more transparent, and start handing powers back to the member states.

But things quickly went off course. Although the leaders of the EU had signed up to these fine principles, and had even written them down in a grand document called the "Laeken Declaration", the great majority did not actually believe in them in the slightest.

Instead, EU leaders appointed the federalist Valery Giscard d'Estaing to draw up an EU Constitution, which gave even more powers to the EU. Under the Constitution, everything from immigration to your electricity bill would become a subject for Brussels to decide on, by majority vote.

When the Constitution was torpedoed by the French and Dutch, EU leaders simply dredged it up, gave it a fresh coat of paint, and had another go. I am not surprised the Treaty has been sunk again.

The surprise is that EU leaders have still learned nothing the second time around. Eventually rats in a maze will find their way out. But the leaders of Europe want to go round the same circle yet again, like a gormless coach driver with a broken sat-nav who can't admit to himself that he is coming up to the same dreary roundabout yet again.

Two ways out

There are two ways this mad process can end. One is to press on regardless and risk a crisis of legitimacy.

The news this week that only 29% of UK voters now support full EU membership should warn EU leaders that they are on very thin ice. Their reaction to the no vote so far plays perfectly into the hands of those who want to leave the EU.

The better way out would be to accept the no vote for what it was – a rational rejection of deeper EU integration – and to carry out the reforms that were promised in the Laeken Declaration.

But in Brussels that is clearly regarded as a crazy idea. Totally off the wall.

Instead the EU has launched a spin operation to smear the Irish as ungrateful bigots voting against abortion or for some other obscure reason. This spin has been so widespread and so successful, that it's worth repeating here the real reasons why the Irish voted no.

According to a poll for the Irish Times, the reasons people said no were to keep Ireland's power and identity, to safeguard Ireland's neutrality, and the fact that they didn't like being pressured to vote yes.

Crash or gentle reform

Europe's elite are clearly not going to listen, so it looks like the EU is heading for a crash rather than gentle reform. Sooner or later some way will be found to implement the Lisbon Treaty by stealth. Maybe the Irish will not be allowed another referendum.

Perhaps the contents of the Constitution will be repackaged again, this time in the Croatian accession treaty. It hardly matters which route is taken to overturn the verdict of the people.

Why are they so determined to continue. Politicians love the EU as it is today because they can dump their political problems onto it and evade responsibility.

That's why, despite the no vote, this week the French proposed the beginnings of an EU naval force and a single asylum policy.

Over the coming years more and more controversial issues are going to be loaded onto the EU, while at the same time its slender support in public opinion withers further.

Sooner or later this structure is going to buckle under the ever-heavier load. I can't tell you what will bring it down.

I can tell you that sooner or later it will come. The current model of responsibility without accountability, power without democracy, can only bear so much. If we carry on like this the madmen in charge are going to blow the EU to bits.

The author is director of the UK-based Open Europe thinktank.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Column

Drums of war again, in Europe

Just a few weeks ago, as Europeans in several countries put their furious debates about masks and corona appsinto higher gear, Turkey and Greece almost came to blows in the Aegean Sea.

Schrems privacy ruling risks EU's ties to digital world

With more and more trade moving to the digital realm, Europe can ill-afford to cut itself off. Meanwhile, China continues to advance a vision for an internet that is fractured along national boundaries and controlled by governments.

Worrying rows over future EU chemicals policy

It is of utmost concern to the environmental health community that forces within the EU Commission are actively trying to push back against a European Green Deal that is supposed to put people's health at its core.

Letter

An open letter to the EPP on end of Hungary's press freedom

I hate to break it to you, but excuses have run out. You have to look at the images of sobbing journalists in Index's newsroom, and shoulder part of the blame. Your silence, your continued procrastination led to this.

Why EU beats US on green pandemic recovery

The United States recovery focused on a number of important issues, including unemployment benefits and funding for health care providers, but lacked any programs directed towards addressing pollution, renewable energy industries, and clean technology improvements.

Why hydrogen is no magic solution for EU Green Deal

Why is the EU Commission promoting a lose-lose (pay more, get less) strategy rather than the straightforward use of green electricity, where it will deliver bigger CO2-reductions and for less money?

News in Brief

  1. Most EU states oppose US sanctions on Russia pipeline
  2. UK imposes quarantine on France, Netherlands, Malta
  3. At least 3.5m EU nationals to stay in UK
  4. UK urged to 'calm down' on migrants
  5. Pompeo starts EU tour with anti-Chinese 5G deal
  6. Dutch lawsuit seeks billions from tech firms
  7. Amazon people urge EU banks to stop funding pollution
  8. Russia vaccine could be "dangerous", Germany says

Revealed: fossil-fuel lobbying behind EU hydrogen strategy

As with the German government – which presented its own hydrogen strategy last month – the European Commission and other EU institutions appear to be similarly intoxicated by the false promises of the gas industry.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDANext generation Europe should be green and circular
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNEW REPORT: Eight in ten people are concerned about climate change
  3. UNESDAHow reducing sugar and calories in soft drinks makes the healthier choice the easy choice
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersGreen energy to power Nordic start after Covid-19
  5. European Sustainable Energy WeekThis year’s EU Sustainable Energy Week (EUSEW) will be held digitally!
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic states are fighting to protect gender equality during corona crisis

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us