Saturday

23rd Mar 2019

Opinion

German-British rapprochement would mean dark days for Europe

It is a fact long lamented by those two endangered species, British Germanophiles and German Anglophiles: apart from a few pockets of intense co-operation, such as in justice and home affairs, the potential of a German-British partnership has seldom been exploited in European policy. The political impetus to be generated by the German and UK heads of government moving together in elegant tandem has not been realised.

In the past decade, commentators have identified considerable potential for fruitful co-operation. Britain has become less reflexive in its euroscepticism, Germany less ideological in its pro-Europeanism. And yet efforts to hold regular bilateral summits or to improve co-operation across a fuller range of EU affairs have fallen flat.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

  • Germany's Angela Merkel: An ad hoc, blocking coalition could spell trouble (Photo: The Council of the European Union)

Against this depressing background, a change of government in either country usually appears as the dawn of a rapprochement. And it is invariably a false dawn.

In 1998, Gerhard Schroeder and Tony Blair, joined in progressive zeal, were set to realise a common European agenda. The initial euphoria did not last. A decade later, Gordon Brown and Angela Merkel were expected to deliver a well needed dose of pragmatism to the EU. Again, these expectations were short lived.

Although both countries will likely undergo a change of government within a space of nine months, for once there is no expectation of rapprochement. All analysts are agreed: with the spectre of a Conservative government hanging over the UK, there is no prospect of improvement in the relationship. Just the opposite in fact.

The British Conservatives have already upset Germany's governing Christian Democrats by their withdrawal from the European People's Party in the European Parliament. And Berlin is working itself into a lather about Conservative hostility to the Lisbon Treaty.

And yet, the failure of rapprochement over the past years suggests that Germany and Britain are not meant to be fair-weather friends. Perhaps there really is scope for improvement in adversity.

Any rapprochement would have to overcome the differences of style that have hampered co-operation in the good times. For these stylistic differences have proved intractable.

When eyeing up partners, Berlin namely demands a degree of ideological clarity and long-term thinking. Compare this to London's short-termist pragmatism. Meanwhile, Berlin likes to lock itself into highly institutionalised relationships. Contrast this with London's practice of promiscuous bilateralism, where it picks up and drops partners depending on the issue at hand.

Of course, these are not just matters of style, they are strategies for self-preservation. The problem with all co-operation is that one's chosen partner may secretly defect from a common agenda, leaving the other to unwittingly bear the costs for its realisation.

German embrace

The German reaction to this risk is to lock its chosen partners into an intense, formal embrace, cutting any scope for defection. The British reaction is precisely the reverse: to leave the door wide open for itself to bail out. This is not the stuff of a settled partnership.

How then could the scope for co-operation between unwieldy Germany and perfidious Britain be any better under a eurosceptic British government? The simple reason is that German-British co-operation need not be constructive. It can also perform more of a blocking role.

The next German government would never enter into a long-term, institutionalised blocking relationship with another EU state. This would be so at odds with its European vocation as to be ridiculous. With eurosceptic voices distinctly voluble in the new German government, however, Berlin might countenance a pragmatic, ad-hoc blocking relationship with another state.

A Conservative government, likely a recalcitrant presence across a whole range of the EU's more sensitive policy areas, would probably be open to this more British form of co-operation.

It's an abstract prospect, but one that is not entirely impossible. Perhaps we policy watchers can engage in our favourite activity after all - hailing the reinvigoration of bilateral relations. At the same time, the pro-Europeans among us would have to ready ourselves for a troubling time for the EU.

Roderick Parkes is head of the Brussels office of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs

Macron is confusing rigidity with strength

Jan Zahradil, EU Commission president Spitzenkandidat for the European Conservatives and Reformists Group, responds to Emmaneul Macron's European vision ahead of the May elections.

A compromise proposal for the Article 50 extension

At this week's summit, EU leaders should extend Article 50 until the May European elections. But they should postpone the effective date of the UK's withdrawal from EU rights, rules, and regulations for another year - to May 2020.

Catalan independence trial is widening Spain's divides

What is really needed is not the theatre of a rebellion trial, but a forensic examination of whether public funds were misused, and a process of dialogue and negotiation on how the Catalan peoples' right to self-determination can be satisfied.

My plan for defending rule of law in EU

EPP leader and prospective next EU Commission president Manfred Weber spells out his plan for dealing with recalcitrant EU member states - ahead of Wednesday's EPP meeting on the vexed issue of Hungary's Viktor Orban and Fidesz.

EU must get real on Russia

The EU must call the Ukraine conflict by its true name - Russia's illegal war on its peaceful neighbour - and take commensurate action to protect peace in Europe.

News in Brief

  1. EU leaders at summit demand more effort on disinformation
  2. Report: Corbyn to meet May on Monday for Brexit talks
  3. Petition against Brexit attracts 2.4m signatures
  4. Study: Brexit to cost EU citizens up to €40bn annually
  5. NGOs demand France halt Saudi arm sales
  6. Report: Germany against EU net-zero emissions target
  7. Former top EU official takes job at law firm
  8. Draft text of EU summit has Brexit extension until 22 May

Italy should capitalise on Brexit

Now that the UK is leaving, Italy can, and should, step up. It is the third largest country and economy in the EU. Spain and Poland follow, but they are significantly smaller economically and population-wise.

The Magnitsky Act - and its name

It is disappointing that so many MEPs in the Socialist and Green group caved in to Russian interests, in fear of challenging a plutocratic regime, by saying 'no' to naming the Magnitsky legislation by its rightful name: Magnitsky.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  4. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  5. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan
  8. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic talks on parental leave at the UN
  10. International Partnership for Human RightsTrial of Chechen prisoner of conscience and human rights activist Oyub Titiev continues.
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic food policy inspires India to be a sustainable superpower
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID

Latest News

  1. Italy takes China's new Silk Road to the heart of Europe
  2. What EU leaders agreed on climate - and what they mean
  3. Copyright and (another) new Brexit vote This WEEK
  4. EU avoids Brexit crash, sets new date for 12 April
  5. Campaigning commissioners blur the lines
  6. Slovakia puts squeeze on free press ahead of election
  7. EPP suspends Orban's Fidesz party
  8. Macron is confusing rigidity with strength

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Counter BalanceEU bank urged to free itself from fossil fuels and take climate leadership
  2. Intercultural Dialogue PlatformRoundtable: Muslim Heresy and the Politics of Human Rights, Dr. Matthew J. Nelson
  3. Platform for Peace and JusticeTurkey suffering from the lack of the rule of law
  4. UNESDASoft Drinks Europe welcomes Tim Brett as its new president
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers take the lead in combatting climate change
  6. Counter BalanceEuropean Parliament takes incoherent steps on climate in future EU investments
  7. International Partnership For Human RightsKyrgyz authorities have to immediately release human rights defender Azimjon Askarov
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersSeminar on disability and user involvement
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersInternational appetite for Nordic food policies
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Nordic Innovation House in Hong Kong
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region has chance to become world leader when it comes to start-ups
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersTheresa May: “We will not be turning our backs on the Nordic region”

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us