Sunday

17th Dec 2017

Magazine

History of the agencies (re)shuffle

  • Nine EU agencies and institutes were originally divided among member states at an EU summit in December 1993. (Photo: European Commission)

The scramble among member states to host EU agencies is a feature of European integration that dates back to the founding of the first decentralised bodies.

A dive into the archives shows that time and again, political deal-making, not logic or objective criteria, is the decisive factor for determining the seat of an EU agency.

Thank you for reading EUobserver!

Subscribe now for a 30 day free trial.

  1. €150 per year
  2. or €15 per month
  3. Cancel anytime

EUobserver is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that publishes daily news reports, analysis, and investigations from Brussels and the EU member states. We are an indispensable news source for anyone who wants to know what is going on in the EU.

We are mainly funded by advertising and subscription revenues. As advertising revenues are falling fast, we depend on subscription revenues to support our journalism.

For group, corporate or student subscriptions, please contact us. See also our full Terms of Use.

If you already have an account click here to login.

  • West Berlin, geographically isolated in the 1970s because of the Cold War, was awarded the seat of the Cedefop agency. (Photo: Barbara Ann Spengler)

The notion that agencies should be equally divided among member states was already applied early on, when the first agency of the European Communities was set up - the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop). It was established in 1975, when the European Communities had nine members.

Months before the decision was made, Dutch regional newspaper Limburgsch Dagblad actively campaigned for Cedefop to be based in Limburg, the south-eastern province of the Netherlands, after quoting civil servants from the region who said that the Dutch government had not made any attempt to attract a European institution. In an editorial, the newspaper argued that hosting Cedefop may help tackle the province's economic situation - since at that time, it was facing the closure of its coal mines.

Despite the Dutch government's bid, West Berlin - which at the time was geographically isolated because of the Cold War - was awarded the agency seat.

"Beautiful opportunity lost because of [Dutch] government's attitude", the disappointed newspaper Limburgsch Dagblad headlined. A few months later, the Netherlands missed out on hosting another agency, the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, which ended up in Dublin.

Behind closed doors

The next agency to be established was the European Environment Agency (EEA), in May 1990. The European Commission had left the decision on the EEA's location to the Council of the EU, where member states meet, something MEPs criticised a month later.

British Labour MEP Ken Collins said the Commission should have proposed a seat, instead of "leaving it all to the Council to make a deal … on the basis of the kind of deals the Council of Ministers get up to behind closed doors when they have had their second cognac."

His compatriot MEP Caroline Jackson, a Conservative, said the agency should be in Brussels. "Would the United States suddenly decide to put the United States Environmental Protection Agency in Nebraska and the Food and Drugs Agency in San Francisco? Of course they would not, they are both in Washington."

MEPs adopted a text that called for the seat of the EEA to be decided "without delay", but they had to urge the member states twice more in strongly worded texts to hurry up, with centre-left Danish MEP Kirsten Jensen in 1992 blaming the "ludicrous" situation, in part, on "French blackmail".

France was among the countries blocking a decision because it wanted the Strasbourg seat of the European Parliament to be solidified first, which was not confirmed until December 1992.

It would not be until December 1993 that government leaders were able to agree on the location of the EEA, partly due to the fact that, in the meantime, additional agencies had been proposed or set up. With nine agencies and institutes to distribute, the task became somewhat easier.

But not all offices were held in equally high regard. The European Monetary Institute, the predecessor of the European Central Bank, was seen as the top prize. It went to Frankfurt.

Spanish prime minister Felipe Gonzalez, seen here in 1989 with German chancellor Helmut Kohl, did not want to accept hosting only the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market, and managed to also secure the seat of the Agency for Health and Safety. (Photo: European Commission)

The then Spanish prime minister, Felipe Gonzalez, was reportedly not satisfied with only hosting the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, which deals with trademarks, so also clinched the seat of the Agency for Health and Safety at Work.

The EEA eventually went to Copenhagen.

Political games and deceit

The mega deal also involved the relocation of the Cedefop from Berlin to Thessaloniki, in Greece, something that was criticised by the agency's director, Ernst Piehl. "We have not been informed beforehand. … To the contrary: we have even been deceived," the Berliner Zeitung newspaper quoted him as saying in its 15 November 1993 edition. Piehl would leave the agency within a year.

It was also a sensitive trade, so soon after the reunification of West and East Germany. Alexander Longolius, centre-left member of the state parliament of Berlin, said the desire to place the European Central Bank in the western part of Germany led to a "sacrifice of the anchoring of the European idea in eastern Germany".

Problems continued to arise when a seat for a new agency was needed.

According to Merijn Chamon of the Ghent European Law Institute, it was common in the 1990s that the decision on an agency's location was only dealt with after the agency had been established. He wrote in his book - EU Agencies: Legal and Political Limits to the Transformation of the EU Administration - that sometimes "the agency was provisionally located in Brussels, which hampered its functioning since it could not provide certainty to its (potential) functionaries on their actual place of work."

For example, when the European Commission proposed a Community Plant Variety Office (CVPO) in August 1990, the seat of the office was left open. The Council established the office in July 1994, but it wasn't until more than two years later that foreign affairs ministers decided the seat should be in Angers, France.

The CVPO had already started its work in Brussels, and the relocation to Angers "was not done in a day", its annual report published in 1997 said. The report noted that one of the challenges was "keeping the staff and their families informed and motivated to make the move".

The Finns don't know what prosciutto is

The most colourful account of how an agency seat was decided came after an EU summit in Laeken in December 2001. Reuters news agency quoted from a verbatim record, and saw then Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi clash with Belgian colleague Guy Verhofstadt, who was chairing the meeting, over the location of the European Food Safety Authority (Efsa). At that time, the Finnish capital of Helsinki was proposed.

Italian PM Berlusconi (c) shaking hands with Belgian foreign minister Michel, managed to convince his Belgian colleague Verhofstadt (r) and other EU leaders that the EU's food safety agency should be hosted in Parma, a city "synonymous with good cuisine". (Photo: European Commission)

"Parma is synonymous with good cuisine. The Finns don't even know what prosciutto is. I cannot accept this," Berlusconi reportedly said in reaction. "The gastronomic attraction of a region is no argument for the allocation of an EU agency," replied Verhofstadt. German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder added: "I love Parma, but you'll never get it if you argue like that."

But Berlusconi proved Schroeder wrong.

Two years later, at a summit in Brussels - chaired this time by the Italian media mogul himself - the fifteen government leaders decided that Efsa should be based in Parma. Helsinki got the seat of the European Chemicals Agency, and another seven already-established or proposed agencies were distributed.

Priority for new member states

The distribution of agencies among existing EU members was concluded some months before ten Central and Eastern European countries would join the EU, but the government leaders wrote in a declaration that for future hosting decisions of agencies, "priority" should be given to new member states.

That worked for several years, with new agencies being located in Poland, Hungary, Malta, the Baltic states, and Slovenia.

In July 2008, EU leaders confirmed their commitment in another declaration, saying: "Seats of future offices or agencies should be primarily located in the member states that acceded to the Union in or after 2004, while appropriate priority should be given to the member states that do not already host an EU office or agency."

But just three years later, that promise was broken. As part of the EU's attempt to prevent future banking crises, three financial agencies were set up, including the European Banking Authority (EBA). The three were divided amongst the big three EU member states: Germany, France, and the UK. The EBA was to succeed the already existing London-based Committee of European Banking Supervisors.

Initially, the EU parliament wanted the EBA to be located in Germany, near the Frankfurt-based European Central Bank. But then UK finance minister George Osborne managed to convince his peers and achieved, in the words of the UK newspaper, the Telegraph, an "EU victory" by keeping the EBA in London.

But five years later, in 2016, British citizens voted to leave the EU, leaving the EBA up for grabs again.

This story was originally published in EUobserver's 2017 Regions & Cities Magazine.

Click here to access EUobserver's entire magazine collection.

EU states enter bidding contest for new energy body

Sweden is set to inherit the thorny problem of where to place a number of newly-born European agencies when it takes over the EU presidency on 1 July. Earlier this week, three EU states indicated their interest in hosting the new energy body, proof that the dossier is gaining in political influence.

Magazine

The EU Agencies Race

In this edition of EUobserver's Regions & Cities magazine, we take a closer look at some of the EU agencies, exploring how their location matters and the benefits for cities and regions to host them.

Stakeholder

Cities united by love of good food

Cooperation between cities can build healthier communities and help kick-start the local economy. The URBACT programme enables EU cities to develop solutions through networking, capacity-building and knowledge-transfer activities.

Magazine

The EU Agencies Race

In this edition of EUobserver's Regions & Cities magazine, we take a closer look at some of the EU agencies, exploring how their location matters and the benefits for cities and regions to host them.

News in Brief

  1. EU adopts 'track-and-trace' tobacco system
  2. Luxembourg appeals Amazon tax decision
  3. EU leaders agree to open phase 2 of Brexit talks
  4. Juncker: May made 'big efforts' on Brexit
  5. Merkel took 'tough' line on Russia at EU summit
  6. EU leaders added line supporting 'two-state' solution
  7. EU leaders agree to 20 European Universities by 2024
  8. Belgian courts end legal proceedings against Puigdemont

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Dialogue PlatformThe Gülen Community: Who to Believe - Politicians or Actions?" by Thomas Michel
  2. Plastics Recyclers Europe65% plastics recycling rate attainable by 2025 new study shows
  3. European Heart NetworkCommissioner Andriukaitis' Address to EHN on the Occasion of Its 25th Anniversary
  4. ACCACFOs Risk Losing Relevance If They Do Not Embrace Technology
  5. UNICEFMake the Digital World Safer for Children & Increase Access for the Most Disadvantaged
  6. European Jewish CongressWelcomes Recognition of Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel and Calls on EU States to Follow Suit
  7. Mission of China to the EUChina and EU Boost Innovation Cooperation Under Horizon 2020
  8. European Gaming & Betting AssociationJuncker’s "Political" Commission Leaves Gambling Reforms to the Court
  9. AJC Transatlantic InstituteAJC Applauds U.S. Recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital City
  10. EU2017EEEU Telecom Ministers Reached an Agreement on the 5G Roadmap
  11. European Friends of ArmeniaEU-Armenia Relations in the CEPA Era: What's Next?
  12. Mission of China to the EU16+1 Cooperation Injects New Vigour Into China-EU Ties

Latest News

  1. Catalonia, Brexit, and Uber on EU agenda This WEEK
  2. Macron and Merkel take tough line on Poland
  3. Eurozone future needs structural reforms, EU leaders told
  4. Showdown EU vote on asylum looking likely for next June
  5. EU stresses unity as it launches next phase of Brexit talks
  6. Polish PM ready for EU sanctions scrap
  7. Dutchman to lead powerful euro working group
  8. EU mulls post-Brexit balance of euro and non-eurozone states

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EPSUEU Blacklist of Tax Havens Is a Sham
  2. EU2017EERole of Culture in Building Cohesive Societies in Europe
  3. ILGA EuropeCongratulations to Austria - Court Overturns Barriers to Equal Marriage
  4. Centre Maurits CoppietersCelebrating Diversity, Citizenship and the European Project With Fundació Josep Irla
  5. European Healthy Lifestyle AllianceUnderstanding the Social Consequences of Obesity
  6. Union for the MediterraneanMediterranean Countries Commit to Strengthening Women's Role in Region
  7. Bio-Based IndustriesRegistration for BBI JU Stakeholder Forum about to close. Last chance to register!
  8. European Heart NetworkThe Time Is Ripe for Simplified Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labelling
  9. Counter BalanceNew EU External Investment Plan Risks Sidelining Development Objectives
  10. EU2017EEEAS Calls for Eastern Partnership Countries to Enter EU Market Through Estonia
  11. Dialogue PlatformThe Turkey I No Longer Know
  12. World Vision7 Million Children at Risk in the DRC: Donor Meeting to Focus on Saving More Lives

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EPSU-Eurelectric-IndustriAllElectricity European Social Partners Stand up for Just Energy Transition
  2. European Friends of ArmeniaSignature of CEPA Marks a Fresh Start for EU-Armenia Relations
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Energy Ministers Pledge to Work More Closely at Nordic and EU Level
  4. European Friends of ArmeniaPresident Sargsyan Joined EuFoA Honorary Council Inaugural Meeting
  5. International Partnership for Human RightsEU Leaders Should Press Azerbaijan President to End the Detention of Critics
  6. CECEKey Stakeholders to Jointly Tackle the Skills Issue in the Construction Sector
  7. European Friends of ArmeniaLaunch of Honorary Council on the Occasion of the Eastern Partnership Summit and CEPA
  8. EPSUStudy Finds TUNED and Employers in Central Governments Most Representative
  9. Mission of China to the EUAmbassador Zhang Ming Received by Tusk; Bright Future for EU-China Relations
  10. EU2017EEEstonia, With the ECHAlliance, Introduces the Digital Health Society Declaration
  11. European Jewish CongressEJC to French President Macron: We Oppose All Contact With Far-Right & Far-Left
  12. ACCASmall and Medium Sized Practices Must 'Offer the Whole Package'