Monday

6th Apr 2020

MEPs: 'Mass surveillance' still possible under US privacy deal

  • Facebook, a signatory to the Privacy Shield, confirmed that 2.7m European citizens’ profiles were among those improperly used in the Cambridge Analytica scandal (Photo: Ann Wuyts)

A delegation of MEPs from the parliament's civil liberties committee (LIBE) have voiced their concerns over the remaining "deficiencies" of the EU-US 'privacy shield' framework, after examining the data agreement with American authorities last week.

In 2016, the EU and the US adopted an agreement to share personal data for commercial purposes, under certain conditions.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

However, this deal has repeatedly received criticism from civil society and MEPs, who believe European citizens' rights might be not fully protected.

"We have raised our concerns with US authorities regarding the remaining deficiencies with the EU-US privacy shield," said the chair of LIBE and head of the delegation, MEP Juan Fernando López Aguilar.

"More needs to be done to provide the adequate level of data protection for EU citizens," he warned.

Last October, the European Commission gave the greenlight to the agreement in its third annual review, while ensuring that it was necessary to have a mechanism in place to protect EU citizens when their data was transferred to the US.

However, the majority of MEPs who travelled to the US (23-28 February) to assess the state of play of deal remain sceptical.

"Every review that was undertaken by the commission since 2017 revealed serious deficiencies. Despite some improvements in certain areas the main questions have not been solved, for example how to protect EU citizens from mass surveillance," said socialist MEP Birgit Sippel.

"Any EU decision has to protect the essence of the right to the protection of personal data and privacy, but I have serious doubts that this is the case for the shield," she added.

Calls for suspension

In June 2018, the parliament called on the commission to suspend the EU-US data transfer pact - something that might happen due to the so-called "Schrems II" and "La Quadrature de Net" ongoing cases before the European Court of Justice.

According to German MEP Patrick Breyer (Greens/EFA), the EU-US privacy shield does not provide adequate protection for EU citizens because "it does not even attempt to prevent mass surveillance".

Similarly, the socialist MEP Marina Kaljurand believes that there are still "significant legal questions" about this agreement, including the risk of bulk data collection, the safety of onward transfers to third countries or the lack of having an effective "judicial remedy."

Kaljurand also said that there have been some positive steps since 2018, which include the appointment of the ombudsperson and an increase in random checks.

However, the European Data Protection Board does not consider the 'ombudsperson mechanism' to be equal to an effective judicial remedy, an open question to be answered by the Court of Justice of the European Union. (EUCJ)

"One part is crystal clear. We - the EU and the US - need an effective and efficient mechanism for the exchange of personal data based on international law and GDPR," Kaljurand told EUobserver.

Cambridge Analytica example

In 2018, it was reported how Facebook profiles were harvested by London-based elections consultancy Cambridge Analytica without users' consent and used for political advertising.

Facebook, a signatory to the privacy shield, confirmed that 2.7m European citizens' profiles were among those improperly used by Cambridge Analytica.

The same year, the parliament approved a resolution which stressed that the Cambridge Analytica scandal "highlights the need for proactive oversight and enforcement actions with systematic checks of the practical compliance of privacy policies with the privacy shield principles".

Following Facebook's non-compliance with the privacy shield, the delegation of MEPs who recently assessed the agreement regretted that the EU did not impose a fine on Facebook.

According to Estelle Massé from NGO Access Now, "by maintaining the privacy shield, the commission weakens Europe's data protection framework and risks undermining its global leadership role in advancing human rights".

Privacy Shield less relevant given GDPR, says data chief

Giovanni Buttarelli, the European data protection supervisor, says the EU-US data sharing pact known as Privacy Shield will play an increasingly minor role given the general data protection regulation.

Will US privacy-lite hollow out GDPR?

Some say GDPR is the most developed data protection law in the world, but the US has opted for a very different approach - a "voluntary tool" based on privacy risk management.

EU backtracks on plans to ban facial recognition

The European Commission came under fire on Wednesday for ruling out a moratorium on facial recognition. Instead, it proposed a public debate with stakeholders to determine when this technology might be used.

Zuckerberg lobbies Brussels ahead of new EU rules

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg met on Monday three European commissioners in charge of digital policies - Thierry Breton, Margrethe Vestager and Vera Jourová - to discuss upcoming EU rules and the responsibilities of platforms regarding disinformation.

Analysis

EU plan on AI: new rules, better taxes

The bloc wants to become a global leader in innovation in the data economy and AI. However, proportional legislation, better data-availability and huge invesment will be needed across the EU to compete with China and the US.

MEPs urge binding rules for common chargers by July

MEPs demanded the European Commission ensure immediate EU regulatory action on common chargers for all mobile devices by July, enabling users to easily re-use old devices and reducing e-waste.

Online platforms need regulating, Jourova warns

The EU commission vice-president pledged to tackle disinformation by regulating platforms and cleaning up online political advertising rules. She also pointed to Russia and China as wanting to undermine European democracy.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking Europe’s Economy Circular – the time is now
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersScottish parliament seeks closer collaboration with the Nordic Council
  3. UNESDAFrom Linear to Circular – check out UNESDA's new blog
  4. Nordic Council of Ministers40 years of experience have proven its point: Sustainable financing actually works
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ministers paving the way for 5G in the region
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms

Latest News

  1. Coronabonds clash continues This WEEK
  2. EU depicts Africa's health system as a threat
  3. Greenland watches ... and waits for virus
  4. Coronavirus exposes lack of common data approach
  5. Virus recovery talks should ditch old taboos: EU's Vestager
  6. EU's 'Irini' Libya mission: Europe's Operation Cassandra
  7. Slovak army deployed to quarantine Roma settlements
  8. Lockdown: EU officials lobbied via WhatsApp and Skype

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us