Thursday

2nd Feb 2023

Court ruling is 'test' of Yanukovych's EU intentions

Tuesday's (30 April) ruling by the human rights court in Strasbourg will test whether President Viktor Yanukovych really wants EU integration, the Ukrainian opposition says.

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) said in its verdict that judge Rodion Kireyev's decision to put former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko in pre-trial detention back in 2011 was "arbitrary and unlawful."

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • Tymoshenko waves from police van outside court back in 2011 (Photo: byut.org)

It noted that he did not do it because she might abscond, but for "other reasons."

Three of the judges added in an annex that his "ulterior motives" were related "to the applicant's identity and influence as a leading opposition politician in Ukraine" in the run-up to parliamentary elections.

The ECHR is still pondering a second case on whether Kireyev's subsequent jailing of Tymoshenko for seven years on charges of abuse of office was also political.

But the fact the same judge is involved already undermines the seven year sentence.

Yanukovych now has four choices.

He can appeal.

He can do nothing for three months until the preliminary judgement becomes final under ECHR procedure.

He can point to the fact Tymoshenko also faces charges of murder and of embezzlement in two other ongoing trials in Ukraine as a pretext for doing nothing until the trials end further down the line.

Or he can implement the ECHR verdict.

A court spokeswoman said it is up to Ukraine to decide what implementation would mean and that its reaction will be evaluated by a special ECHR committee.

For its part, the EU diplomatic service stopped short of saying Yanukovych should free Tymoshenko.

It noted that he should "reconsider thoroughly [her] situation" and "take urgent steps to remedy the systemic procedural shortcomings identified" by the ECHR in his judicial system.

But several MEPs did call for Tymoshenko to get out.

"The ruling … confirms the trial against Tymoshenko was politically motivated. Tymoshenko must be freed immediately," Elmar Brok, the German centre-right deputy who chairs parliament's foreign affairs committee, said.

At stake is a major shift in post-Soviet politics in Europe.

If EU countries deem that Yanukovych is ignoring their demands for reform, they will refuse to sign an association and free trade pact with Ukraine at a summit in Vilnius in November.

The treaty would put Ukraine on a path to one day join the EU.

But without it, there is every chance it will instead join a Russia-led Customs Union, putting it back in Moscow's sphere of influence.

At the same time, if Yanukovych does free Tymoshenko, he risks seeing her topple him from power in next year's presidential elections - a recent poll noted that 37 percent of Ukrainians see her as the main opposition figure in the country.

"This is a test. If Yanukovych wants to sign the [EU] treaty then he has to act accordingly," Hryhoriy Nemyria, an MP from Tymoshenko's party, told EUobserver.

"If the government says that they will study this verdict and that they might appeal, it would be clear for me that he has failed the test," he added.

Yanukovych himself did not react immediately.

But Vladyslav Zabarskiy, the head of the legal service for Yanukovych's Party of the Regions quibbled about the meaning of the Strasbourg verdict.

He noted that only the annex, not the verdict, speaks of political motives. He also made a big deal out of the ECHR's agnosticism on Tymoshenko's claim she was physically mistreated.

"There is no single reason to say today that the ECHR decision can be the basis to change somehow the situation with Tymoshenko," Zabarskiy said.

Behind the scenes, some EU countries are worried that the ECHR and MEPs such as Brok are playing into Yanukovych's hands.

"There is a feeling that despite what he says, Yanukovych does not really want to sign the association agreement. But at the same time he wants the EU to take the blame for it," one EU diplomat said.

If the feeling is right, it creates a fifth and a sixth option for Yanukovych as well.

He could free her but not rehabilitate her, meaning that she could not run in the presidential vote and that EU countries would be unlikely to reward him for it.

Or he could free her but do it so near the November deadline that EU officials would not have time to prepare a common position on the treaty signature.

Either scenario would make it easy for Yanukovych to spin the death of the treaty as Brussels' fault, the EU diplomat said.

Opinion

Ukraine: the book scandal that never was

Ukraine's President is getting millions of euros for books he never wrote. But Ukrainians have stopped believing that any kind of scandal will bring change.

Opinion

Europe is giving more aid to Ukraine than you think

'Europeans need to pull their weight in Ukraine. They should pony up more funds.' Such has been the chorus since the start of the war. The problem is the argument isn't borne out by the facts, at least not anymore.

Column

Democracy — is it in crisis or renaissance?

Countries that were once democratising are now moving in the other direction — think of Turkey, Myanmar, Hungary or Tunisia. On the other hand, in autocracies mass mobilisation rarely succeeds in changing political institutions. Think of Belarus, Iran or Algeria.

Latest News

  1. MEPs launch anonymous drop-box for shady lobbying secrets
  2. Hawkish ECB rate-rise 'puts energy transition at risk'
  3. MEPs push for greater powers for workers' councils
  4. How Pavel won big as new Czech president — and why it matters
  5. French official to take on Islamophobia in EU
  6. EU green industry plan could spark 'dangerous subsidy race'
  7. Wolves should be defended, EU ministers urge
  8. EU Commission wants drones for Bulgaria on Turkey border

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Party of the European LeftJOB ALERT - Seeking a Communications Manager (FT) for our Brussels office!
  2. European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual & Reproductive Rights (EPF)Launch of the EPF Contraception Policy Atlas Europe 2023. 8th February. Register now.
  3. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains
  4. Forum EuropeConnecting the World from the Skies calls for global cooperation in NTN rollout
  5. EFBWWCouncil issues disappointing position ignoring the threats posed by asbestos
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersLarge Nordic youth delegation at COP15 biodiversity summit in Montreal

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP27: Food systems transformation for climate action
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region and the African Union urge the COP27 to talk about gender equality
  3. Friedrich Naumann Foundation European DialogueGender x Geopolitics: Shaping an Inclusive Foreign Security Policy for Europe
  4. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe
  5. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  6. European Committee of the RegionsRe-Watch EURegions Week 2022

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us