Thursday

7th Jul 2022

Austria: EU talks on Syria have failed

Austria raised the stakes in EU talks on Syria late on Monday (27 May), saying the UK and France have destroyed a potential compromise on arms shipments to rebels.

Foreign ministers broke off negotiations for dinner at 8.30pm local time in Brussels and planned to restart at 10pm in what one diplomat predicted will be "a long night."

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

But Austria's Michael Spindelegger used the break to tell press the talks have failed.

He said the best potential compromise was to renew an EU arms embargo on Syria for another year, while giving EU countries the option to suspend it in August if they all agree there is "a real tremendous change in the situation."

He said the UK and France instead asked for a free hand to ship weapons when they deem fit, while making a political promise not to do it just yet.

"It did not happen," he said on efforts to get all 27 EU states to agree.

"I can't imagine there will be a change after so many hours of talks," he added.

With the old EU sanctions to legally expire on 1 June, Spindelegger noted that EU nations will now have to create 27 separate sets of restrictions on arms transfers or visa bans and asset freezes on Syrian VIPs.

"Afterwards, everybody is entitled to deliver weapons to the [Syrian] regime or to the opposition. What we can do from the Austrian side is … to create sanctions at national level. So we will not be open to any officials of [Syrian leader] Assad coming to Austria with a visa," he noted.

Other ministers were less pessimistic, however.

Breaking for the dinner, Germany's Guido Westerwelle told media the talks have been "difficult" but "constructive."

British foreign minister William Hague said little on his way out, but promised to return.

An EU diplomat noted that "serious work will continue" and that the ministers would not be coming back at 10pm if the talks had really collapsed.

Britain and France believe the arms move is needed to force the Syrian government to negotiate and to help protect civilians from its jets and tanks.

But Austria is against it on two grounds.

It is worried about reprisals against Austrian peacekeepers in a UN contingent on the Israeli-Syrian border.

It also says the EU is a "peace organisation" which should not make a "fundamental" change in its foreign policy by intervening on one side in a civil war.

Other arms sceptics, such as the Czech republic, worry that modern surface-to-air or anti-tank missiles shipped to "moderate" rebels, such as the Free Syrian Army, will end up in the hands of Islamist radicals.

For their part, Turkey and the US back the Anglo-French idea.

But some US experts think they could be in for a nasty surprise.

Robert Baer, a former CIA officer in the Middle East who now writes on security issues for Time magazine, told EUobserver: "Once those arms cross the border, there's no control over them."

He said that as in the civil war in Lebanon in the 1980s, the fiercest fighters in Syria are religious extremists.

"What you're doing is creating a Salafi nation if they win in Syria … If they take down Assad, they won't thank the West. Their only objective will be to export jihad to Lebanon and Jordan," he said, referring to the extremist Salafi movement in Sunni Islam and the Islamic concept of holy war.

"They're going to fire that stuff [British and French weapons] at Israel because they want to meet their maker," he added.

Opinion

What is the Free Syrian Army? An inside look

As EU foreign ministers meet in Dublin to discuss arming the Free Syrian Army, Koert Debeuf, an EU parliament official, tells EUobserver who the rebels really are.

EU arms to Syria: what, how and if

Britain and France are since Saturday free to ship arms to Syrian rebels. But many analysts think the idea is "a bluff."

Opinion

Nato's Madrid summit — key takeaways

For the most part Nato and its 30 leaders rose to the occasion — but it wasn't without room for improvement. The lesson remains that Nato still doesn't know how or want to hold allies accountable for disruptive behaviour.

Column

One rubicon after another

We realise that we are living in one of those key moments in history, with events unfolding exactly the way Swiss art historian Jacob Burckhardt describes them: a sudden crisis, rushing everything into overdrive.

News in Brief

  1. France to nationalise nuclear operator amid energy crisis
  2. Instant legal challenge after ok for 'green' gas and nuclear
  3. Alleged Copenhagen shooter tried calling helpline
  4. Socialist leader urges Czech PM to ratify Istanbul convention
  5. Scottish law chief casts doubt on referendum
  6. British PM faces mounting rebellion
  7. Russian military base near Finnish border emptied
  8. Euro slides to lowest level in two decades

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  4. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers for culture: Protect Ukraine’s cultural heritage!
  6. Reuters InstituteDigital News Report 2022

Latest News

  1. Legal action looms after MEPs back 'green' nuclear and gas
  2. EU readies for 'complete Russian gas cut-off', von der Leyen says
  3. Rising prices expose lack of coherent EU response
  4. Keeping gas as 'green' in taxonomy vote only helps Russia
  5. 'War on Women' needs forceful response, not glib statements
  6. Greece defends disputed media and migration track record
  7. MEPs adopt new digital 'rule book', amid surveillance doubts
  8. 'World is watching', as MEPs vote on green finance rules

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us