Wednesday

29th Mar 2023

Arms to Ukraine debate divides Western allies, experts

  • Nato satellite images showing Russian armour in Ukraine last year (Photo: nato.int)

Estonia has called on the West to arm Ukraine, but the question remains divisive both inside Europe and in the US.

Estonian president Toomas Hendrik Ilves told media on Tuesday (3 February) that Ukraine will cease to be unless its new allies intervene in the conflict.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

“If we take into account the fact that Ukraine is defending itself with 20 to 30-year old weapons, it's clear that Ukraine will be the one that loses the war,” he said.

“I agree with the recently-published conclusions of the think tank Brookings, according to which the United States and Nato must provide military assistance to Ukraine or else Ukraine will be destroyed”.

He was referring to a paper by eight former US diplomats and defence chiefs.

The group said the US should give Ukraine $1 billion a year in military aid over the next three years, including modern anti-tank missiles.

It also said former Communist countries, such as Poland and the Baltic states, should furnish weapons because their arsenals contain former Soviet systems which are more compatible with Ukraine’s capabilities.

The debate will intensify this week when US secretary of state John Kerry visits Kiev and vice-president Joe Biden comes to Brussels.

It will also come up when Nato defence ministers meet in Brussels on Thursday and when US and European policymakers meet in Germany for the annual Munich Security Conference this weekend.

Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko in an interview with German daily Die Welt, out on Thursday, said: “We still need a lot of military, technical, and specialist help to improve the fighting strength of the Ukrainian army in its resistance of Russian aggression.”

But for its part, the US state department said no decision has been made.

“Obviously, there are a range of views and opinions within the [US] administration. That’s why we have internal discussions … But our policy [on giving non-lethal assistance only] hasn’t changed and a decision hasn’t been made to do that [send arms]”, state department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told press in Washington on Wednesday.

Merkel says No

Inside Europe, France, Germany, and Finland in recent days ruled out bilateral assistance.

“Germany will not send Ukraine any deadly, lethal weapons ... we are focusing on a diplomatic solution”, chancellor Angela Merkel said on Tuesday.

“We have no intention of delivering weapons at this stage to Ukraine," French defence minister Jean-Yves Le Drian told media on Wednesday.

EU diplomats are instead in talks on expanding their Russia blacklist over the recent escalation in fighting, which, according to the UN, has claimed 224 civilian lives in the past three weeks alone.

Diplomatic sources indicate the new list will contain around 15 names and five entities, including Russian decision-makers as well as their agents in Ukraine.

EU leaders, at their next summits in February and March, will also debate further economic sanctions, amid opposition to the idea from several EU states, notably Hungary and Greece.

Meanwhile, the arms to Ukraine question has divided the expert community as well as Western chancelleries.

Experts divided

Wolfgang Ischinger, a former German diplomat who chairs the Munich security meeting, wrote in an op-ed in the Financial Times that unless the West intervenes the “violence will go on”.

But Jeremy Shapiro, a former US official who also works for Brookings, said it would lead to Russian escalation and would give the Kremlin a propaganda victory.

“The Russian regime has defined the struggle in Ukraine as part of an existential battle against American imperialism ... American provision of arms would lend credence to that view and increase the Russian government’s freedom of action at home”.

Samuel Greene, a Russia analyst at King’s College London, noted: “the price of arming Ukraine is likely to be a rupture in trans-Atlantic solidarity, and therefore the loss of the greatest asset the West has had in this fight to date”.

Spearhead force

For their part, the Nato defence chiefs will on Thursday in any case adopt decisions likely to prompt Russian criticism.

They are expected to seek troop commitments for a new “spearhead” force to deter Russian aggression in the Baltic region.

They are also set to establish new command-and-control facilities in the Baltic states and in Poland, Romania, and Bulgaria, involving extra US military personnel on Russia’s borders.

EU to blacklist five Russians

EU diplomats have agreed to list a Russian deputy defence minister, two officials and two MPs over the recent escalation in Ukraine.

UK reserves right to arm Ukraine military

The UK has followed the US in saying that if diplomacy doesn’t stop Russian aggression in Ukraine then it might start arming the Ukrainian military.

Column

What does China really want? Perhaps we could try asking

Perhaps even more surprising to the West was the fact that the Iran-Saudi Arabia deal was not brokered by the United States, or the European Union, but by the People's Republic of China. Since when was China mediating peace agreements?

Opinion

Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity

From the perspective of international relations, the EU is a rare bird indeed. Theoretically speaking it cannot even exist. The charter of the United Nations, which underlies the current system of global governance, distinguishes between states and organisations of states.

Latest News

  1. EU approves 2035 phaseout of polluting cars and vans
  2. New measures to shield the EU against money laundering
  3. What does China really want? Perhaps we could try asking
  4. Dear EU, the science is clear: burning wood for energy is bad
  5. Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity
  6. Finnish elections and Hungary's Nato vote in focus This WEEK
  7. EU's new critical raw materials act could be a recipe for conflict
  8. Okay, alright, AI might be useful after all

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWWEFBWW and FIEC do not agree to any exemptions to mandatory prior notifications in construction
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality
  6. Promote UkraineInvitation to the National Demonstration in solidarity with Ukraine on 25.02.2023

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Azerbaijan Embassy9th Southern Gas Corridor Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting and 1st Green Energy Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting
  2. EFBWWEU Social Dialogue review – publication of the European Commission package and joint statement of ETUFs
  3. Oxfam InternationalPan Africa Program Progress Report 2022 - Post Covid and Beyond
  4. WWFWWF Living Planet Report
  5. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us