Sunday

25th Sep 2022

Brexit Briefing

Repeal Bill enters land of unknown

  • The planned 'Great Repeal Bill' is now called 'European Union (Withdrawal) bill'. (Photo: House of Commons)

It is a step into the constitutional unknown. The UK took its first major step towards putting Brexit into law on Thursday (13 July). This will be a marathon, not a sprint, and enjoyed only by parliament’s barrack-room lawyers.

In another sign that the Theresa May government’s pre-election confidence has vanished, the planned “Great Repeal Bill”, the bill consolidating over 40 years of EU law into UK law, has been reduced to the less grandly-titled "European Union (Withdrawal) bill".

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The government’s Brexit department also published three very slim position papers on the Euratom treaty, which is likely to be one of the first issues that ministers compromise on; administrative issues and cases before the European Court of Justice.

Ministers have decided to pick a fresh fight over the status of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The bill includes a clause stating that: “The charter of fundamental rights is not part of domestic law on or after exit day.”

Labour and the Liberal Democrats have already signalled that they will oppose scrapping the Charter. There is a slight irony here.

Back in 2007, Tony Blair’s government sought a UK opt-out when the Charter was included as part of the Lisbon Treaty, before eventually settling for a protocol stating that the Charter did “not extend” the ability of the European Court of Justice to overrule judgements by UK courts. Ten years, however, is plenty of time for a U-turn.

Because of its lack of majority, May’s government is as vulnerable to political opportunism as it is to substantive issues such as workers’ rights and environmental protections.

'Naked power grab'

The Scottish and Welsh governments have already vowed to refuse to give legislative consent to the bill.

A joint statement by Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and her Welsh counterpart, Carwyn Jones, termed the bill a “naked power grab” which “does not return powers from the EU to the devolved administrations, as promised. It returns them solely to the UK government and parliament, and imposes new restrictions on the Scottish parliament and national assembly for Wales.”

The bill must be substantially re-drafted, say Sturgeon and Jones. Ministers could still proceed and call their bluff: the devolved governments cannot veto the Repeal bill, but that would risk a constitutional crisis.

Liberal Democrat leader, Tim Farron, says that the May government is “facing a parliamentary version of guerrilla warfare that resembles the days of the Maastricht treaty” in the early 1990s. Yet piloting the Repeal Bill through parliament will surely be tougher than passing Maastricht, which permanently split the Conservative party over Europe.

Great for lawyers

For one thing, the volume of legal acts involved is unprecedented. The bill covers more than 12,000 EU regulations, and over 6,000 directives, along with a mere 7,900 pieces of UK secondary which have implemented EU legislation. Great news if you’re a constitutional lawyer, or a parliamentary clerk.

The government has also promised that a further 800 and 1,000 pieces of secondary law will have to be tabled by executive order – itself a controversial procedure – alongside the bill.

For another, John Major’s Conservative government had an absolute majority to pass Maastricht. May is relying on the support of the Democratic Unionists, and cannot afford a handful of her Conservative MPs to rebel.

While ministers were taking to the airwaves to defend their handiwork, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, as well as Sturgeon and Jones were in Brussels to meet with Michel Barnier. Had May secured the majority she expected, it is unlikely that the opposition leaders would have been given an audience.

Now, however, they are plausible alternative government who could yet end up negotiating with Barnier before the end of the Article 50 process in March 2019.

On Wednesday MPs elected chairpersons for its parliamentary committees, with prominent Conservative ‘Remainers’ Nicky Morgan and Tom Tugendhat taking the influential Treasury and Foreign Affairs committees - a further sign that the balance of power has shifted.

No hurry

This vulnerability goes some way to explaining why the government is in no hurry to proceed with the bill.

While the bill was formally presented to MPs on Thursday (13 July), there is currently no date for Second Reading, when MPs will get their first chance to debate and vote on it. Nothing will happen until autumn.

The head of the UK’s national audit office, Amyas Morse, suggested on Thursday that the government’s approach to Brexit could fall apart “like a chocolate orange”. For his part, the former Vote Leave director, Dominic Cummings, says he expects Brexit talks to be “botched”.

This pessimism reflects the struggles facing a government with an ill-defined position on Brexit, and which lacks the votes to force through its will. At home and abroad, Theresa May’s ministers face lengthy battles on all fronts.

Benjamin Fox, a former reporter for EUobserver, is a freelance writer.

UK to depart EU court and Euratom

UK position papers call for departure from EU court and nuclear treaty as officials prepare for second round of Brexit talks.

Barnier urges UK to come up with Brexit positions

The EU's negotiator calls on the UK government to come up with its positions on key Brexit issues ahead of the next round of talks on Monday. London is expected to do that by the end of the week.

Brexit Briefing

May's call to compromise helps mask party disunity

In a speech on Tuesday, the UK prime minister is expected to urge Labour and other opposition parties to “come forward with your own views and ideas” on what post-Brexit Britain should look like.

Brexit Briefing

Taking back control at home, not from EU

A year after British voters chose to leave the EU, "taking back control" from the bloc is firmly on the back-burner, as May government’s main ambition is its immediate survival.

Opinion

How to apply the Nuremberg model for Russian war crimes

A Special Tribunal on Russian war crimes in Ukraine must be convened, because no permanent or existing international judicial institution is endowed with jurisdiction over Russian high-ranking officials, writes the head of the Ukraine delegation to the Council of Europe.

Opinion

Losing on the Ukrainian battlefield will not unseat Putin

Notwithstanding the remarkable Ukrainian advances, a Russian defeat would not necessarily translate into regime change in Moscow. It is likely Putin will try to spin his military setbacks as evidence of the existential threat facing Russia.

News in Brief

  1. More Russians now crossing Finnish land border
  2. Report: EU to propose €584bn energy grid upgrade plan
  3. Morocco snubs Left MEPs probing asylum-seeker deaths
  4. EU urges calm after Putin's nuclear threat
  5. Council of Europe rejects Ukraine 'at gunpoint' referendums
  6. Lithuania raises army alert level after Russia's military call-up
  7. Finland 'closely monitoring' new Russian mobilisation
  8. Flights out of Moscow sell out after Putin mobilisation order

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”
  3. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  5. European Centre for Press and Media FreedomEuropean Anti-SLAPP Conference 2022
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling

Latest News

  1. Ireland joins EU hawks on Russia, as outrage spreads
  2. Editor's weekly digest: Plea for support edition
  3. Investors in renewables face uncertainty due to EU profits cap
  4. How to apply the Nuremberg model for Russian war crimes
  5. 'No big fish left' for further EU sanctions on Russians
  6. Meloni's likely win will not necessarily strengthen Orbán
  7. France latest EU member to step up government spending in 2023
  8. Big Tech now edges out Big Energy in EU lobbying

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us