Leaked papers 'compromise' Wilders' right to fair trial
By Peter Teffer
The second trial against Dutch anti-immigration politician Geert Wilders commenced on Friday (18 March) in Amsterdam with a dramatic call for an investigation into leaked documents.
Dutch newspaper AD had announced on Thursday night it would publish excerpts of documents from Wilders' legal team that contained their legal strategy.
Dear EUobserver reader
Subscribe now for unrestricted access to EUobserver.
Sign up for 30 days' free trial, no obligation. Full subscription only 15 € / month or 150 € / year.
- Unlimited access on desktop and mobile
- All premium articles, analysis, commentary and investigations
- EUobserver archives
EUobserver is the only independent news media covering EU affairs in Brussels and all 28 member states.
♡ We value your support.
If you already have an account click here to login.
“Apparently someone has gained access to these documents,” said Wilders' lawyer Geert-Jan Knoops. He called the leak an “attack on this trial” and said it was a “breach of the right to a fair trial”. He said his legal team was now unsure if their lawyer-client communication can be conducted confidentially.
He asked the court to investigate the leak before the next session, which is scheduled for 26 May 2016. He also began his defence against the charges.
While Friday's session was, in formalterms, just a preparatory meeting to determine witnesses and other due process, Knoops gave an extensive plea that lasted almost five hours.
The question the Dutch court will investigate over the coming months is: Where does freedom of speech for politicians end and where does their responsibility not to insult groups or to incite hatred begin?
In March 2014, Wilders spoke twice about the extent to which his supporters want to have “fewer Moroccans” in the Netherlands.
The public prosecutor said on Friday that freedom of speech is important, but that it is “not absolute”.
He said it entails “obligations and responsibilities”, including the responsibility not to pit incite parts of the population against each other.
The prosecutor said that, according to one witness, Wilders’ first comment on his voters wanting “if at all possible, fewer Moroccans” was a slip of the tongue. But the second time he brought it up, one week later, it was premeditated.
According to another prosecution witness, a Wilders foot soldier on the second occasion prepared the crowd by telling them what Wilders would talk about and when they should chant “fewer, fewer, fewer”.
Out of context
Wilders' lawyer Knoops said the public prosecutor had taken the comments out of context.
Knoops said that Wilders had also asked the crowd if they wanted “less Europe” and “less Labour party” in their city. The lawyer invited the court to bring in what he called “scientific” experts to evaluate Wilders’ “fewer Moroccans” comment in the context of his whole career.
Knoops said the Netherlands lacks a “consistent theory” on the limitations of free speech.
He also said the fact that the Dutch deputy prime minister had publicly criticised Wilders’ “fewer Moroccans” comment meant that ordinary Dutch people see him as being guilty before the trial even began.
Knoops said procedural issues further harm the integrity of the trial.
He said some of the Moroccan witnesses, especially older ones, had filled out police forms that they did not understand and that some forms were filled out for them by other people.
The public prosecutor noted that 6,475 people had filed complaints, but that their quantity was not a factor in his decision on whether to open the case.
The trial was held at a heavily guarded complex near the country's main airport, Schiphol in Amsterdam.
It takes place two years after Wilders made the comments about Moroccans and at a time when his party is riding high in polls.
Wilders himself was also in the room, but would only speak at the end of the hearing.
At 4PM, the court suspended the sitting for at least one hour to give the public prosecutor the time to prepare a response to the Knoops’ plea, which had been surprisingly long.
It is the second time that Wilders is in court on suspicion of insulting a group and inciting hatred. He was cleared of all charges in the former case in 2011.