30th Mar 2023


Expansion of data-collection is eroding EU values and rights

  • In October, Wiewiórowski's staff carried out an audit of Frontex's processing of personal data of migrants (Photo: Frontex)
Listen to article

Wojciech Wiewiórowski is a 51-year old Polish national whose job as the EU's data protection supervisor (EDPS) is to ensure that European institutions and bodies respect peoples' right to privacy and data-protection. Yet those rights are regularly denied to thousands of people seeking asylum in the EU, he warns.

Wiewiórowski, who heads the independent, Brussels-based, EDPS, says the EU has "two extreme approaches," when it comes to the collection of and processing of people's data crossing a border of the European Union.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • EU data protection supervisor Wojciech Wiewiórowski: 'We are forgetting for which reasons we were collecting the data' (Photo: European Council)

The first is value-based and one where everyone is treated fairly regardless of origin. The second is security focussed and one where people have to give up all their data, irrespective of privacy rights. "The second approach is not convincing for us," he says.

Wiewiórowski warns that people who arrive at the borders seeking international protection are forced into divulging all their personal data in order to gain access to the EU. That data is fed into large EU databases, some of which were set up to crack down on criminals.

"We are forgetting for which reasons we were collecting the data," he says. This poses a slew of data-protection problems, spanning concepts like "purpose limitation" and "data minimisation." Both are spelled out in the EU's general data protection regulation (GDPR), as well as its directive on law enforcement.

It means authorities are only supposed to collect data for specific purposes. But Wiewiórowski says there is a push to collect everything possible. This is fed into a maze of EU and national security databases that then 'talk' to one another. "I feel a little bit puzzled," he acknowledges.

The European system is based on humane values, he says. But at the same time people are being denied their rights. Wiewiórowski says he partly understands the approach by EU states, the border authorities, and Frontex when it comes to migration. But he is also bound by rights enshrined in the EU treaties.

Earlier this year he ordered Europol to erase data on people with no established link to a criminal activity. The Hague-based agency had hoovered up four petabytes of sensitive data, including from asylum seekers with no criminal records.

And in October, his staff carried out an audit of Frontex's processing of personal data of migrants at their headquarters in Warsaw. The probe is looking at how Frontex and Europol are sharing data through the Processing of Personal Data for Risk Analysis, known as PeDRA.

Fabrice Leggeri, when he was still executive director at Frontex, had proposed expanding PeDRA to allow boarder guards to collect sensitive data on asylum seekers, including their sexual orientation.

Wiewiórowski's task and that of national data-protection authorities is only likely to get more difficult as tech-based solutions to security issues push privacy rights on the back burner. Over the years, the EU has dramatically increased its security budgets to shore up its external borders.

The EU's Internal Security Fund shot up by 90 percent to €1.9bn, when compared to the EU's previous seven-year budget cycle. The fund is intended to reinforce police powers, including the exchange of data. It helped finance to the tune of some €15m the expansion of Greece's automated border surveillance system, which aims to track down migrants attempting to enter through Turkey. It is operated by the Hellenic Police.

Greek authorities describe it as an all-seeing system that can provide real-time and accurate information. Now Athens is testing EU-funded drones with artificial intelligence to track people seeking refuge.

Another big budget boost went to the EU's Integrated Border Management Fund, which increased to €7.3bn. One of its goals is to detect irregular migration crossings, including by setting up large scale IT systems for border management.

Behind those figures lies a wider malaise over migration, coupled with EU-wide policy initiatives tying asylum to geo-political tensions. None of the money, for example, will go towards helping search and rescues in the Mediterranean Sea.

Instead, the clampdown on the borders in places like Greece, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland and elsewhere is most visibly manifested by walls and fences aimed at keeping people out. Border guards, for instance in Latvia, used force to push people back into Belarus last year, according to Amnesty International.

The focus may be on these physical barriers. But while tech surveillance systems, artificial intelligence technologies, and security databases used by EU and national authorities to gauge a person's intent, background, and origin may be less visible, they are very much part and parcel of 'Fortress Europe'.

"Fundamental rights are definitely right now under stress," Wiewiórowski warns.

This article first appeared in EUobserver's magazine, Digital EU: the Good, the Bad — and the Ugly, which you can now read in full online.


Racist algorithms and AI can't determine EU migration policy

Artificial Intelligence in migration is increasingly used to make predictions, assessments, and evaluations based on racist assumptions it is programmed with. But with upcoming AI Act, the EU has a chance to draw red lines on the most harmful technologies.


The secrecy behind the EU's plans to 'externalise' migration

It is evident that the EU is putting substantial diplomatic and political effort into its 'externalisation' of migration plans: Niger, for example, received visits in 2022 from Ursula von der Leyen and EU commissioenrs Ylva Johannson and Jutta Urpilainen.

Digital EU: the Good, the Bad — and the Ugly

The European Union has impressive digital ambitions and an equally-impressive array of initiatives, proposals, directives and regulations, all designed to make the bloc 'fit for the digital age'. But what do they all mean — and will they all work?

Vestager: 'Technology must not steal our time'

Given the rapid pace of digitalisation, the EU has rushed to set and regulate digital standards. Many new initiatives are led by Margrethe Vestager, EU commissioner for competition, who says the focus must be on making technology work for people.

Latest News

  1. The overlooked 'crimes against children' ICC arrest warrant
  2. EU approves 2035 phaseout of polluting cars and vans
  3. New measures to shield the EU against money laundering
  4. What does China really want? Perhaps we could try asking
  5. Dear EU, the science is clear: burning wood for energy is bad
  6. Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity
  7. Finnish elections and Hungary's Nato vote in focus This WEEK
  8. EU's new critical raw materials act could be a recipe for conflict

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. InformaConnecting Expert Industry-Leaders, Top Suppliers, and Inquiring Buyers all in one space - visit Battery Show Europe.
  2. EFBWWEFBWW and FIEC do not agree to any exemptions to mandatory prior notifications in construction
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Azerbaijan Embassy9th Southern Gas Corridor Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting and 1st Green Energy Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting
  2. EFBWWEU Social Dialogue review – publication of the European Commission package and joint statement of ETUFs
  3. Oxfam InternationalPan Africa Program Progress Report 2022 - Post Covid and Beyond
  4. WWFWWF Living Planet Report
  5. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us