6th Jun 2023

New EU rules to make companies liable for their AI failures

  • The scope of the new rules include everything from software updates, cybersecurity gaps, drones, medical health apps, and self-driving cars (Photo: Pixabay)
Listen to article

The EU Commission on Wednesday (28 September) proposed rules to make it easier for both consumers and companies to sue makers or operators of drones and robots using artificial intelligence (AI) for compensation for any damages.

As more-and-more AI-operated tools surround us — think of package-delivery drones, self-driving lorries, cleaning robots — the EU executive set out a bill to alleviate the burden of proof for customers.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The draft AI Liability Directive is complementary to the AI Act, an upcoming legislation on artificial intelligence as it becomes a bigger part of society's life.

The draft rules, which still needs to be approved by EU governments and the European Parliament, make it explicit that injured people can claim compensation if software or AI systems cause damage, whether to life, property, health or privacy.

"We want the same level of protection for victims of damage caused by AI as for victims of old technologies," justice commissioner Didier Reynders told reporters in Brussels.

While victims will still need to prove that somebody's fault caused the harm, the commission proposed two ways to make it easier for consumers to do that.

The new rules would require companies to disclose information about high-risk AI systems so that the victims could identify the liable person and the actual fault that caused the damage.

"This is to avoid victims being confronted with a black box of AI," Reynders added.

Another tool is a "presumption of causality", which means that victims only need to show that the manufacturer or user failed to comply with certain requirements and obligations which caused the harm.

If companies fail to provide that information then a presumption is made that they had not done what they were supposed to do under these requirements and obligations.

Products under the draft rules include anything from software updates — that for instance render victims' smart-home products unsafe or when manufacturers fail to fix cybersecurity issues — to medical health apps, and self-driving cars.

The new draft rules do not yet allow compensation for breaches of fundamental rights — for instance, if someone failed a job interview because of discriminatory AI recruitment software. That will be dealt with under the AI Act currently under negotiations.

Reynders dismissed concerns that the liability rules would hamper innovation of AI tools.

He said AI tools needed to be safe and trusted by consumers to really catch on.

"New technologies, such as drones, delivery services based on AI, can function, only when consumers feel safe and protected when using them," he said.

"If we want to make the most of large potential of AI, we have to cater for its risks," Reynders added.

Those with unsafe products originating from non-EU countries will be able to sue the manufacturer's EU representative for compensation.

Predicting migration: the opaque science behind AI technologies

European states and international organisations have developed technologies to detect migration patterns and predict the number of people from third countries seeking asylum in the EU. But doubts have been raised about the effectiveness and desirability of using predictive technologies.


EU lobbying clean-up — what happened to that?

Six months after Qatargate, as institutional inertia and parliamentary privileges weigh in, the sense of gravity and collective resolve have all but disappeared. MEPs show little enthusiasm for reform of the rules that today allow them significant outside paid activities.

Latest News

  1. Final steps for EU's due diligence on supply chains law
  2. Top EU court rules Poland's court reforms 'infringe law'
  3. Sweden's far-right is most anti-Green Deal party in EU
  4. Strengthening recovery, resilience and democracy in regions, cities and villages
  5. Why Hungary cannot be permitted to hold EU presidency
  6. Subcontracting rules allow firms to bypass EU labour rights
  7. Asylum and SLAPP positions in focus This WEEK
  8. Spanish PM to delay EU presidency speech due to snap election

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Sustainable Finance CentreJoin CEE Sustainable Finance Summit, 15 – 19 May 2023, high-level event for finance & business
  2. ICLEISeven actionable measures to make food procurement in Europe more sustainable
  3. World BankWorld Bank Report Highlights Role of Human Development for a Successful Green Transition in Europe
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic summit to step up the fight against food loss and waste
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersThink-tank: Strengthen co-operation around tech giants’ influence in the Nordics
  6. EFBWWEFBWW calls for the EC to stop exploitation in subcontracting chains

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us