Friday

21st Jul 2017

EU to become world's worst place for tax cheats

  • Semeta: 'Luxembourg and Austria have to stick to the instructions of the heads of state' (Photo: Alan Cleaver)

The European Commission has said the EU is building "the most comprehensive information exchange system in the world" to combat tax dodging.

Algirdas Semeta - the Lithuanian commissioner behind a series of new tax laws - made the claim in Brussels on Wednesday (12 June).

Thank you for reading EUobserver!

Subscribe now and get 40% off for an annual subscription. Sale ends soon.

  1. €90 per year. Use discount code EUOBS40%
  2. or €15 per month
  3. Cancel anytime

EUobserver is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that publishes daily news reports, analysis, and investigations from Brussels and the EU member states. We are an indispensable news source for anyone who wants to know what is going on in the EU.

We are mainly funded by advertising and subscription revenues. As advertising revenues are falling fast, we depend on subscription revenues to support our journalism.

For group, corporate or student subscriptions, please contact us. See also our full Terms of Use.

If you already have an account click here to login.

He told press his regime goes further than recent US legislation, the Fatca law, which says foreign banks can lose their US licence if they do not share information on US account holders.

"The EU system will become even broader than the US system," he noted.

Semeta spoke after tabling a new bill, an amended version of the EU's existing Administrative Co-operation Directive (ACD).

The old ACD forces EU countries to share information on non-residents' employment income, director's fees, life insurance products, pensions and real estate assets.

But it contains a loophole, saying data can be withheld if it is not easily "available."

The updated ACD says the availability clause should be reviewed in 2017.

It also calls for information sharing on "dividends, capital gains, other financial income and [on] account balances" from 2015 whether the data is easily available or not.

Semeta is at the same time herding EU countries to adopt his amended Savings Tax Directive.

Under the old savings law, EU countries tell each other how much interest non-residents earn on bank deposits.

But they do not share data on interest arising from investment funds, pensions, innovative financial instruments, trusts or foundations.

Meanwhile, two EU banking centres - Austria and Luxembourg - are exempt.

Semeta said the updated savings law closes the loopholes and will be adopted by the end of the year in line with a promise by EU leaders in May.

"Luxembourg and Austria have to stick to the instructions of the heads of state," he noted.

He added there is "new momentum" in EU capitals to adopt a third proposal, the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), as well.

Corporate tax avoidance - creating structures which are legal, but which are designed to avoid paying levies in high-tax countries - costs EU treasuries €150 billion a year.

Semeta said "if we implement the CCCTB at EU level, then the problem of transfer pricing, where companies shift profits from one country to another, would simply disappear from the Union."

Independent experts welcome the updated savings tax bill.

Mark Morris, a tax specialist at the Baker & McKenzie law firm, said it is unique because it "pierces" the secrecy of "untaxed entities and legal arrangements."

Entities such as trusts and foundations hide the real owner of the money to avoid tax.

But Semeta's law says if the owner cannot be identified, then the tax disclosure burden falls on whoever is entitled to income from the entity, whoever contributed money to set it up, or whoever manages it on the owner's behalf.

It also obliges entities to declare money held in exotic jurisdictions, such as the British Virgin Islands (BVI).

"No previous tax law in the world since the time of the Crusaders [Medieval times] has been able to pierce these structures because the beneficial owner is always hidden," Morris noted.

John Christensen - the British chief of the Tax Justice Network (TJN), an NGO - called the amended savings law "a major step forward in the battle against tax evasion."

He noted the EU information exchange model is "multilateral" in nature, but America's Fatca is "unilateral" and has less scope for adoption by the G8 or G20 clubs of leading nations.

"We would like to see the EU approach become the basis for a global standard," he said.

Baker & McKenzie's Morris and another TJN analyst, Markus Meinzer, voiced reservations on the new ACD, however.

Morris said it will be "toothless" if it does not contain the same provisions on trusts and foundations as the savings tax bill.

Meinzer said it leaves several questions unanswered: "Who would be responsible for collecting all the information? How do you treat dividends paid by a trust, for instance? How do you treat capital gains paid by a trust to a company based in a place like the BVI?"

He added: "If these kinds of issues aren't addressed, then this proposal is doomed to be easily circumvented."

Ireland on the defensive in Apple tax row

Ireland has come under fire for its low-tax regime amid US revelations that Apple and other large corporations are using EU-based subsidiaries to avoid paying taxes.

Opinion

Tax wars: EU playing catch-up with US

The EU has promised to create the world's leading tax transparency regime. But it is playing catch-up with Fatca, the equivalent US legislation.

Greece to seize tax dodgers' assets

Greek tax authorities will seize the assets of businesses and individuals who do not settle their tax debts, the government has said.

Opinion

Greece needs a new plan

Two years into its third bailout, Greece needs to combine the necessary fiscal targets with a new vision. This can be done in the context of the ongoing industrial revolution.

Opinion

Ceta and pesticides: A citizens' rights issue

The trade agreement with Canada will begin to apply on 21 September. But there is still a potential conflict on the right to data protection vs. the right to access information.

News in Brief

  1. Polish parliament adopts controversial justice reform
  2. GMO opt-out plan unlikely to go anywhere in 2017
  3. Slovak PM threatens to boycott inferior food
  4. France takes Google's 'right to be forgotten' to EU court
  5. Turkey accuses German companies of supporting terror
  6. Israel's Netanyahu caught calling EU 'crazy'
  7. UK does not collect enough data to expel EU nationals
  8. Polish president threatens to veto justice reform

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Jewish CongressJean-Marie Le Pen Faces Trial for Oven Comments About Jewish Singer
  2. ACCAAnnounces Belt & Road Research at Shanghai Conference
  3. ECPAFood waste in the field can double without crop protection. #WithOrWithout #pesticides
  4. EU2017EEEstonia Allocates €1 Million to Alleviate Migratory Pressure From Libya in Italy
  5. Dialogue PlatformFethullah Gulen's Message on the Anniversary of the Coup Attempt in Turkey
  6. Martens CentreWeeding out Fake News: An Approach to Social Media Regulation
  7. European Jewish CongressEJC Concerned by Normalisation of Antisemitic Tropes in Hungary
  8. Counter BalanceOut for Summer Episode 1: How the EIB Sweeps a Development Fiasco Under the Rug
  9. CESICESI to Participate in Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee on Postal Services
  10. ILGA-EuropeMalta Keeps on Rocking: Marriage Equality on Its Way
  11. European Friends of ArmeniaEuFoA Director and MEPs Comment on the Recent Conflict Escalation in Nagorno-Karabakh
  12. EU2017EEEstonian Presidency Kicks off Youth Programme With Coding Summer School

Latest News

  1. Dutch coalition talks lengthiest in 40 years
  2. Polish parliament steps up showdown with EU
  3. EU urges UK to clarify its Brexit positions
  4. Law expert: direct EU powers have become too complicated
  5. Winter is here for Spitzenkandidat, but he'll survive
  6. Mafia money pollutes the EU economy
  7. Central Europe should be wary of Brexit stopping
  8. Poland's 'July coup' and what it means for the judiciary