29th Oct 2020


Belarus: Inside Lukashenko’s crackdown on independent voices

  • Belarus president Alexander Lukashenko has been in power continuously since 1994, ruling with a rod of iron. He faces fresh elections in August (Photo:

June 10, 2020, 18:43. Two men approach a car parked in a narrow street near Hrodna city centre, in western Belarus. Behind them, eight young men follow.

The men surround the car shouting "Police!", as they take the hands of both men and pack them into a grey unmarked van that has just pulled over.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • Dzmitry Mitskevich. 'We were arrested minutes after filming the collection of pro-Lukashenko signatures. Fortunately, we didn't turn off the equipment and our colleagues in Minsk and Warsaw were able to witness our arrest live on their screens'

In a couple of seconds, the bus is driving fast along the streets of the Hrodna - once a favourite city of Stefan Batory, the famed 16th century Polish-Lithuanian king.

This looks like a kidnapping scene from a movie about Mexican drug cartels. But it isn't.

One of the two people shoved into the grey Russian Gazel bus is myself, Dzmitry Mitskevich, a journalist of Belsat TV - which is banned by the regime of Alexander Lukashenko. The other man is my cameraman.

Minutes before our detention on 10 June, we had finished filming from the centre of Hrodna where state organisations had been collecting signatures for Lukashenko. He is running for his sixth presidential term in the upcoming election on August 9.

Fortunately, we didn't turn off the equipment and our colleagues in Minsk and Warsaw were able to witness our arrest live on their screens.

We were detained by the special police forces - OMON, as they call themselves, according to Soviet tradition. The police in Belarus are still called "militia", as in the former USSR.

The Soviet militia was initially a non-professional organisation for law enforcement. The term "militia" sounds appropriate for Belarusian strongmen in civilian clothes who are attacking people in the streets.

Minutes later on June 10, the van arrives at Hrodna Leninski district police station where we hear that we're charged with breaking Article 22.9 of the Belarusian Administrative Code.

The article prohibits producing content for media not registered and accredited in Belarus. As the Belarusian foreign ministry has refused to issue a single accreditation to Belsat reporters, we are always facing the risk of breaking the law.

At the police station, we are forced to hand over all of our possessions, including phones, watches and jewellery. Everything is listed on the "detention protocol".

The police officers treated us quite politely and even proposed to take my temperature to check for Covid-19. But this is not their usual behaviour. I have heard reports from my colleagues who were subjected to beatings and intimidation at police stations.

On June 20, for instance, the police in Hantsavichy, Brest region, brutally detained journalists of the Hancavicki čas newspaper, beating and accusing them of "insubordination to the police officer".

Three hours later, when we are finally released, our things are handed back to us, except the video equipment and phones – these things will be taken "for experts" to check whether we used them to break the law. This is a new practice by the authorities – they did not usually confiscate equipment before.

The detention protocol is written by the OMON and local police officers. Often, one of their main tasks dealing with either independent media or political opposition.

Fines are not fine

On June 18, we were given a fine of around $850 [€750]. According to the court, all the equipment except our private mobile phones had to be confiscated, because they were "tools for committing offence".

This is, however, against the law, since the administrative code does not provide for the confiscation of equipment as a punishment. Meanwhile, Article 22.9 itself is a direct violation of the constitutional right to free speech.

Protocols in such cases are usually fabricated by the police, who receive orders from higher authorities once a broadcast is aired on TV or online.

Laws limiting media freedom are also often used by local authorities against journalists who expose inefficiency and corruption in the provinces or villages of Belarus.

Belsat employees who are based in the regions suffer the most, with local authorities eager to use fines as a way of silencing independent media.

Nor do courts ever side with journalists – only 0.2 percent of all cases result in acquittal.

Repression set to increase

Belsat is not the only media outlet to experience pressure from the authorities. Belarusian blogger and journalist Uladzimir Chudziantsou, for example, was arrested and accused of "drug trafficking" while crossing the Belarusian–Polish border on 21 November, 2019.

He was one of the authors of the film Lukashenko - Criminal Records, which details the Belarusian ruler's rise to power in 1994, and his strongman grip on it ever since.

The film became extremely popular, getting more than 2.5 million views on YouTube alone. According to information from different sources, Lukashenko, who is extremely sensitive to criticism, took it as a personal insult.

Another instance of chilling pressure on the media happened in 2018. On 7 August that year, the police broke into the offices of the country's two most popular online news outlets, and

After searching the offices, the police officers seized equipment and detained journalists of both outlets, which are considered independent but not radically opposed to Lukashenko's regime.

The journalists of and were accused of illegally accessing information of the BelTA state-run news agency, resulting in big fines and arrests.

Finally, on 26 March 2020, the editor-in-chief of, Siarhei Satsuk, was arrested for allegedly accepting a bribe to publish an investigative article.

Satsuk is famous for his investigations exposing corruption among Belarusian officials. He was released on 4 April 2020, after the criminal case against him was re-qualified as "fraud". The case is still ongoing.

At the moment, the Belarusian authorities are in their traditional pre-election hysteria, doing everything they can to prevent people from organising and participating in mass protests.

As a result, repressions against independent media will continue and become even tougher. Arrests of more journalists will likely follow.

Author bio

Dzmitry Mitskevich is a journalist at Belsat TV, analyst with Belarus Security Blog, and editor-in-chief of Varta – an annual Belarusian magazine on national security. His field of interests include information warfare, propaganda, international politics and fighting terrorism. This article appeared first on Lithuanian public broadcaster LRT.


Time to pay attention to Belarus

Belarus may be hosting the European Games, but Vladimir Putin is not playing games when it comes to Belarus' independence. The West needs to get serious as well.

Belarus leader's power creeps as opposition swells

Belarus president Alexander Lukashenko is feeling the heat of an opposition backed by public support ahead of the presidential election on 9 August. His bungling of the pandemic and the high profiles of rivals have led to widespread repression.

EU wary of violence in Belarus election

EU states have voiced fear of violence during Belarus elections on Sunday, as president Aleksander Lukashenko seeks to maintain his third decade in power.


The awakening of Belarus

Women, factory workers, lawyers, doctors, artists, intellectuals, and businessmen - they all want change in Belarus and Lukashenko has no good moves left to make.

News in Brief

  1. Kaczyński attacks feminism in apocalyptic terms
  2. US official berates new EU farm policy
  3. Corona death-toll in Europe up 40 percent
  4. Turkey's France boycott goes against EU trade deals
  5. Study identifies four problems in political social media
  6. Court: Belgium violated human rights with Sudan deportations
  7. Frontex launches inquiry into alleged pushbacks
  8. Italy: Police uses teargas against anti-lockdown protests


A 'geopolitical' EU Commission. Great idea - but when?

Safeguarding Europe's position starts with recognising the unpleasant reality that Europe's power is waning. Behind the facade of European cooperation, national self-interest still predominates and that has never been any different.

Rightwing MEPs bend to Saudi will after Khashoggi death

Saudi dissident and journalist Jamal Khashoggi was killed two years ago on 2 October. Since then, mainly centre-right, conservative and far-right MEPs have voted down any moves to restrict, limit or ban the sales of weapons to the Saudi regime.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking healthier diets the easy choice
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersUN Secretary General to meet with Nordic Council on COVID-19
  3. UNESDAWell-designed Deposit Return Schemes can help reach Single-Use Plastics Directive targets
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council meets Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tichanovskaja
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region to invest DKK 250 million in green digitalised business sector
  6. UNESDAReducing packaging waste – a huge opportunity for circularity

Latest News

  1. Belarus: Where's the EU when you need it?
  2. MEPs hear clash over occupied Hungarian drama school
  3. EU Commission sticks to €20bn AI target, despite Covid
  4. Confusion over Frontex's Greek pushback investigation
  5. MEPs push for limited 'right-to-repair' on consumer devices
  6. What American decline means for Europe
  7. Post-Covid is a different world - EU needs to secure a role
  8. Post-Brexit UK vs EU on Ukraine's future

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us