Tuesday

31st Jan 2023

MEPs redouble attack on bailout 'troikas'

  • MEPs cannot do away with the troika, but ask for it to be reformed (Photo: Luc Mercelis)

MEPs investigating the troika of international lenders in bailout countries have said it was marred by conflicts of interest and lacked democratic accountability.

The economic affairs committee on Monday (24 February) adopted the non-binding report, which is to be voted on by the entire European Parliament in April.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Set up on an "ad-hoc basis" as the eurozone was battling the sovereign debt crisis - the troika (containing representatives from the EU commission, European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund, or IMF) - is on shaky legal grounds and should be replaced with a European version of the Washington-based IMF anchored in EU law, MEPs say.

The report "acknowledges that this might lead to the necessity of a treaty change," a process that takes several years to negotiate and ratify in all EU countries.

Eurozone finance ministers in the Eurogroup also bear "political responsibility" for the accompanying austerity measures that had to be implemented in Portugal, Greece, Cyprus, and Ireland in return for the EU-IMF loans, MEPs said.

They also question the dual role of the EU commission as guardian of the EU treaties but also acting on behalf of member states within the troika.

"There is a potential conflict of interest ... especially in policy areas such as competition and state aid policy, social cohesion, and with regard to member states wage and social policy on which the commission has no competence," the report notes.

The European Central Bank also has conflicting interests as "technical advisor" within the troika and creditor of the bailed-out countries, MEPs said.

Another issue is the "generally weak democratic accountability" of the troika in the bailed-out countries' parliaments.

After trips to the four countries, MEPs found that "when consulted, national parliaments were faced with the choice between eventually defaulting on their debt or accepting memoranda of understanding negotiated between the troika and national authorities."

The contracting of consultancy firms without public tender and for "very high fees" to accompany the work of the troika, as well as potential conflicts of interest held by these companies in the respective countries should be object of a "transparent assessment," the report says.

Back in December, EUobserver reported on the multi-million consultancy business accompanying the troika, often beyond scrutiny.

The report lists a number of recommendations, both in the short and long term, aiming at clarifying the roles and the tasks of each participant of the troika.

The Eurogroup, the Council of Ministers and the European Council of EU leaders are called to assume full responsibility for the troika's operations.

The EU commission is asked to provide a comprehensive assessment of its involvement in the troika programmes, including on fundamental rights. According to a German legal expert who spoke to EUobserver last month, the austerity programmes approved by the troika are in breach of the EU Charter of Fundamental rights.

"Every member state has got clear rules on how to deal for instance with ailing municipalities, which face insolvency. The EU too, needs clear rules on how to deal with states in crisis. The troika was a necessary interim solution. But in the long run we need rules on the basis of EU law," Austrian centre-right MEP Othmar Karas said after the vote.

Green Belgian MEP Philippe Lamberts said the report is a "clear and detailed rebuke" to the troika and has uncovered "unacceptable complacency, with assistance programmes based on overoptimistic and half-baked forecasts."

On conflicts of interest, Lamberts noted that they "undermined the democratic accountability of the policies" and weakened the balance of powers between EU institutions.

"We hope a strong majority of MEPs will support the crucial findings of this report, when it is voted by the parliament as a whole, and that its recommendations will be swiftly acted on," he said.

Polish backpedal on windfarms put EU funds at risk

Draft legislation in Poland aimed at relaxing some of Europe's strictest laws surrounding onshore wind-turbines has been derailed by a surprise last minute amendment, which could put Poland back on a collision course with the EU.

Opinion

More money, more problems in EU answer to US green subsidies

Industrial energy-intense sectors, outside Germany and France, will not move to the US. They will go bust, as they cannot compete in a fragmented single market. So to save industry in two member states, we will kill the rest?

Latest News

  1. Democracy — is it in crisis or renaissance?
  2. EU lobby register still riddled with errors
  3. Polish backpedal on windfarms put EU funds at risk
  4. More money, more problems in EU answer to US green subsidies
  5. Study: EU electricity transition sped into high gear in 2022
  6. Russia and China weaponised pandemic to sow distrust, MEPs hear
  7. Frontex to spend €100m on returning migrants this year
  8. EU aims to simplify tax credits to counteract US green subsidies

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Party of the European LeftJOB ALERT - Seeking a Communications Manager (FT) for our Brussels office!
  2. European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual & Reproductive Rights (EPF)Launch of the EPF Contraception Policy Atlas Europe 2023. 8th February. Register now.
  3. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains
  4. Forum EuropeConnecting the World from the Skies calls for global cooperation in NTN rollout
  5. EFBWWCouncil issues disappointing position ignoring the threats posed by asbestos
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersLarge Nordic youth delegation at COP15 biodiversity summit in Montreal

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP27: Food systems transformation for climate action
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region and the African Union urge the COP27 to talk about gender equality
  3. Friedrich Naumann Foundation European DialogueGender x Geopolitics: Shaping an Inclusive Foreign Security Policy for Europe
  4. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe
  5. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  6. European Committee of the RegionsRe-Watch EURegions Week 2022

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us