Wednesday

7th Dec 2022

MEPs demand to exit 'ecocide treaty' after reforms 'fail'

  • The European Commission said in 2020 that a joint withdrawal would be considered if the reform failed to deliver EU core objectives, including the alignment with the Paris Agreement (Photo: Counter Balance)
Listen to article

MEPs on Thursday (23 June) called on the European Commission and national capitals to ditch the controversial trade deal that could lock Europe into decades of fossil fuel use — echoing earlier demands made by the Spanish government and the Dutch parliament this week.

This little-known international agreement, officially the Energy Charter Treaty, protects investments in the energy industry — and it was signed by 50 countries, including all EU member states, back in 1994.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Now all EU states are signatories of the treaty except for Italy which withdrew in 2016. But Italy is still involved in an arbitration case over banning oil and gas project exploration in the Adriatic Sea since the treaty protects investments for decades despite countries' withdrawal.

The highly-controversial treaty has been used by investors on many occasions to challenge EU national climate policies, prompting green experts and campaigners to dub it the "ecocide treaty" or "the world's most dangerous investment agreement."

Even the latest IPCC report refers to it as an obstacle to climate action.

Negotiations to modernise the treaty started early in 2020, in a bid to make it compatible with the 2015 Paris Agreement.

The European Commission since then has been trying to convince EU member states that treaty reform is the best way forward.

But some countries — like Spain, France and Poland — previously argued in favour of simply withdrawing.

The Energy Charter Secretariat and signatories are expected to meet this Friday (24 June) to announce an agreement over the modernisation of the treaty.

But the current proposal, which can still be subject to changes, has been slammed by MEPs, experts and campaigners for still being at odds with EU climate policies and EU law.

"The reform ambition for the controversial Energy Charter Treaty is not good enough…fossil fuels should no longer be protected," Green MEP Anna Cavazzini, lead MEP on the report, told EUobserver.

In her report on the future of EU international investments, EU lawmakers demanded an end to the ECT's most controversial mechanism — the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS).

But attempts to reform the ISDS during modernisation negotiations have been blocked by Japan.

This remains problematic for the EU since the European Court of Justice previously stated that international treaties providing for ISDS must meet certain standards that are not foreseen in the ECT.

Decades of fossil-fuel protection

While new fossil-fuel investments would no longer be protected, they are expected to agree that existing fossil-fuel investments will be protected until 2033, and gas investments until 2040.

But this timeframe should be "significantly shortened" in order not to undermine the EU's climate objectives, according to MEPs.

In addition, they said that the commission should ensure that the reform should prohibit investors from suing EU countries for their policies aimed at phasing out fossil fuels, in line with their commitments under the Paris Agreement.

This refers to the situation in many countries where the government faces arbitration for putting forward climate policies.

The Netherlands, for example, has been sued by the German companies RWE and Uniper over its coal phase-out law. The case is still ongoing.

Experts argued that green transition money will need to be used to compensate investors under the ECT, arguing that the EU will face an increased risk of litigation because new technologies such as hydrogen and biomass are expected to be also listed as protected investments under the modernised ECT.

On Friday, signatories are also expected to agree to lift Russia's observer ECT status as a response to its invasion of Ukraine.

But Yamina Saheb, who works at Paris-based think-tank OpenExp and knows the treaty well since she formerly worked at the body overseeing it, said this announcement will be used "to hide the failure of the modernisation process and uselessness of the ECT as a geopolitical tool".

"The war in Ukraine provides additional evidence that this treaty is not useful for our energy security, it is only useful for foreign investors to sue countries [over their climate policies]," she told EUobserver.

Court exempts intra-EU disputes from energy treaty

EU energy companies cannot use the controversial Energy Charter Treaty to sue member states and claim compensation for the impact of policy measures, the European Court of Justice ruled, casting doubts over a number of ongoing cases.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersLarge Nordic youth delegation at COP15 biodiversity summit in Montreal
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP27: Food systems transformation for climate action
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region and the African Union urge the COP27 to talk about gender equality
  4. International Sustainable Finance CentreJoin CEE Sustainable Finance Summit, 15 – 19 May 2023, high-level event for finance & business
  5. Friedrich Naumann Foundation European DialogueGender x Geopolitics: Shaping an Inclusive Foreign Security Policy for Europe
  6. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe

Latest News

  1. EU takes legal action against China over Lithuania
  2. EU Commission shoring up children's rights of same-sex parents
  3. The military-industrial complex cashing-in on the Ukraine war
  4. EU delays Hungary funds decision, as Budapest vetoes Ukraine aid
  5. Borrell gets pension from MEP fund set for taxpayer bailout
  6. Autocrats make us all less secure
  7. Big Agri's lies: green EU farming not to blame for food insecurity
  8. German top court declares €800bn EU recovery fund 'legal'

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  2. European Committee of the RegionsRe-Watch EURegions Week 2022
  3. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”
  5. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us