Saturday

1st Oct 2022

Opinion

EU 'security and aid' mantra: Hollow words?

  • Cairo protester: The Court of Auditors has criticised EU aid spending in Egypt (Photo: gregg.carlstrom)

Numerous EU documents have said security must be coupled with development as a guiding principle for the Union's external action.

The 2003 European Security Strategy and the 2012 Agenda for Change - the EU's security and development bibles - promise to enhance coherence between development co-operation, humanitarian aid, and the common security and defence policies (CSDP and CFSP).

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

It is more than mere rhetoric.

In recent years, we have seen the EU roll out an impressive range of new funds, such as the Instrument for Stability or the African Peace Facility, as well as new institutions, not least the European External Action Service (EEAS), in this regard.

It holds great potential. But at the same time it runs a great risk of EU policies working at cross-purposes or delivering counterproductive results

In Egypt, the Court of Auditors' report of 18 June paints a bleak picture of EU confusion.

The court says the European Commission and the EEAS allocated a budget of approximately €1 billion in aid between 2007 and 2013, without tackling the country's endemic corruption and poor human rights record.

Criticism of the EU's dubious relations with the regime of former president Hosni Mubarak is not new.

But the report shows nothing was done to address the shortcomings after Mubarak's fall in early 2011, meaning that EU money, in effect, entrenched Egypt's problems.

The court makes clear that it is impossible to isolate development co-operation from political concerns.

The Egyptian army's later overthrow of former president Mohamed Morsi and the violence that continues to unfold on Egypt's streets also underline the need to evolve EU diplomacy in order for it to become an influential actor in neighbourhood crises.

Another instructive example is the EU's work on disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) of former combatants in post-conflict societies, such as the Democratic Republic of Congo or Libya.

The EU has booked good progress in the first two elements, but the reintegration aspect is considerably more difficult.

This risks creating a pool of disarmed, unemployed and frustrated ex-soldiers who could seriously undermine stability.

One simple problem, is that, for all its fine words on joint-up policies, the way the EU institutions crave up their turf, works against EU doctrine: the European Commission does the main EU-level work on development and humanitarian aid, while the EEAS and EU member states do intergovernmental work on security building.

As a result, we see improvisation, duplication, fragmentation and inter-institutional tension.

Looking back to 2005, the Council and the Commission even ended up before the Court of Justice in Luxembourg in a dispute on whether disarmament support to the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is a development or a CFSP measure.

Disputes like this make a mockery of the EU's big promises.

The Lisbon Treaty in 2010 created the possibility to move beyond the ad hoc approach by creating the EEAS and giving it some degree of competence over development as well as security policy.

But the intricacies of so-called inter-service agreements show that treaty change does not automatically yield results.

The EEAS "guides" and "steers" development "strategy," but the commission still decides which cheques to sign.

The Court of Auditor's Egypt report shows that the advent of the EEAS is no panacea.

For its part, the Council already in 2007 tasked the Commission and the Council Secretariat with drafting an action plan on "Security, Fragility and Development."

It is supposed to set out a strategic vision, co-ordination mechanisms and a detailed allocation of tasks.

It is more necessary than ever to have such a blueprint in the EEAS era.

Without it and without its implementation, the EU mantra that "all good things" - security and development - "should go together" risk being hollow words.

Hans Merket is a fellow at the University of Ghent, currently working at the Ethiopian Civil Service University in Addis Ababa

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

How US tech giants play EU states off against each other

Some have tried to justify Big Tech's meagre tax payments in EU states with heavier tax burdens by emphasising the fact that these companies create jobs and invest in next-generation technologies. However, their market dominance comes at a steep cost.

Can King Charles III reset the broken Brexit relationship?

The Queen's funeral was an impressive demonstration of solidarity from the EU towards a country that left the Union in 2020, and with whom the EU's relations have never recovered. Can the new King Charles III build bridges to Brussels?

Column

EU should admonish less, and listen more, to the Global South

Whether on Russia, or gas, or climate change, or food security, the EU's constant finger-wagging and moralising is becoming unbearably repetitive and self-defeating. Most countries in the Global South view it as eurocentric and neo-colonial.

News in Brief

  1. EU ministers adopt measures to tackle soaring energy bills
  2. EU takes Malta to court over golden passports
  3. EU to ban Russian products worth €7bn a year more
  4. Denmark: CIA did not warn of Nord Stream attack
  5. Drone sightings in the North Sea 'occurred over months'
  6. Gazprom threatens to cut gas deliveries to Europe via Ukraine
  7. New compromise over EU energy emergency measures
  8. 15 states push for EU-wide gas price cap

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. The European Association for Storage of EnergyRegister for the Energy Storage Global Conference, held in Brussels on 11-13 Oct.
  2. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  3. European Committee of the RegionsThe 20th edition of EURegionsWeek is ready to take off. Save your spot in Brussels.
  4. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”
  6. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries

Latest News

  1. Putin declares holy war on Western 'satanism'
  2. Two elections and 'Macron's club' in focus Next WEEK
  3. EU agrees windfall energy firm tax — but split on gas-price cap
  4. Ukrainian chess prodigy: 'We are not going to resign ... anywhere'
  5. Going Down Under — EU needs to finish trade deal with Australia
  6. MEPs worry Russian disinfo weakens support for Ukraine
  7. Everything you need to know about the EU gas price cap plan
  8. Why northeast Italy traded in League for Brothers of Italy

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us