Wednesday

25th May 2022

Opinion

Battle with Brussels is risky for Croatia PM

  • Croatia became the 28th member of the European Union on 1 July (Photo: European Parliament)

As the European Commission announced on Wednesday (17 September) the activation of sanctions against the newest EU member state, Croatian Prime Minister Zoran Milanovic found himself politically isolated in the confrontation with Brussels.

In the quest to defend a law limiting the implementation of the European Arrest Warrant, he ended up in a confrontation with a formidable front of old and new opponents which can cost him his political life.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Milanovic has never had public support for passing a law three days before Croatia’s EU accession, which effectively prevented the arrest of Josip Perkovic, former head of the Communist secret police (UDBA), and around 20 other former UDBA agents sought by the German judiciary for the assassination of a Croatian emigrant on German soil.

The centre-right opposition left the Croatian Parliament when the law, popularly known as “lex Perkovic," was voted on June 28.

Aware of the growing discontent of Brussels, as well as Berlin and other European capitals, the liberal junior partner in the ruling coalition, foreign minister Vesna Pusic, also began distancing herself and her party from the Prime Minister’s intransigent position.

Finally, Croatian President Ivo Josipovic, who signed the lex Perković in June and who tried to avoid the public debate during the summer, decided to change course and recently called on the government to return the law to conformity with EU acquis without delay.

For Milanovic, it was also painful to learn that his own choice for commissioner and his former deputy prime minister, Neven Mimica, did not oppose the commission proposal, which was tabled by commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, justice commissioner Viviane Reding and neighbourhood commissioner Stefan Fuele.

The proposal is to activate the safeguard clause provided by article 39 of Croatia’s accession treaty and to launch sanctions, which could include the suspension of a fund to help Croatia enter the EU's passport-free Schengen zone, as well as the establishment of an enhanced EU monitoring.

Not even Milanovic's fellow socialists in the European Parliament raised the case in defence of the lex Perkovic, but rather limited themselves to calling for dialogue and a quick solution in order to avoid sanctions.

Sanctions are in nobody’s interest.

Croatia was supposed to be vivid proof of a sustainable and credible EU enlargement policy, a successful point of reference for neighbouring countries in the Western Balkans and a reassurance to old EU members that mistakes committed in previous enlargements will not be repeated.

But all this has been jeopardized by the irresponsible policy of the current prime minister.

In fact, he committed three consecutive and crucial mistakes.

He betrayed those in Europe who most supported Croatia’s accession, ignored their appeals and, three days before EU accession, passed the lex Perkovic, effectively impeding the arrest and extradition of former Yugoslav secret police agents.

He also underestimated the seriousness of Reding, as well as her readiness to take all necessary measures to restore the compliance of Croatian law with EU acquis.

Finally, he insisted in portraying the whole case as a partisan battle in the context of the next European elections, thus offering Croatia as a topic for political quarrelling instead of protecting its image in Europe.

In order to restore Croatia’s European standing, Milanovic will have to undo what he has done since June 28, when the law was passed.

The time limitations to the European Arrest Warrant should be removed, allowing the arrest and eventual extradition of those involved in state terrorism during the Communist regime.

He also needs to restore a channel of normal communication with the commission and other EU institutions.

If good old diplomacy could bring Moscow and Washington closer on the Syria crisis, it should not be so hard for Milanovic to find a more civilised and productive way to communicate with Brussels.

Finally, it is imperative that Croatia does not become an issue upon which political groups score points in the run up to the European elections.

Instead of attacking Barroso and Reding for their partisan affiliation, it would be wiser for Milanovic to focus on complying with the EU acquis and then reaching out to different political groups in Europe.

By undoing his mistakes, Milanovic could stop the implementation of sanctions, restore Croatia’s EU reputation and avoid his own political demise.

Any other moves are mere illusions that will only elevate the cost of his mistakes. Now is the time for Milanovic to remedy the damage he has done, or to let someone else lead Croatia.

The writer is an MEP from the centre-right EPP group, the political opponents of Milanovic's centre-left S&D faction

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Croatia becomes 28th EU member state

Croatia became the 28th member of the EU at midnight on Sunday, less than 20 years after gaining independence from Yugoslavia.

Letter

Right of Reply: Hungarian government

The government in Budapest responds to EUobserver opinion piece "Are Orban's Covid powers now the 'new normal' in Hungary?"

When Reagan met Gorbachev — a history lesson for Putin

Neither Reagan nor Gorbachev achieved their goal at the famous Reykjavik summit of 1986. Despite that fact there are lessons that current leaders — particularly Vladimir Putin — could adopt from these two iconic leaders.

Column

The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is back

Ukraine is finally understood — and hopefully Belarus will be soon too — as a self-standing society and state with close links to its EU neighbours, rather being relegated to Russia's backyard.

Brexit hostility to Good Friday Agreement is damaging UK in US

Democratic Unionist MPs could affirm unequivocally they support the Good Friday Agreement, with no return of a border with physical controls on movement of people, goods or agricultural produce within the island of Ireland — but they won't.

News in Brief

  1. Dutch journalists sue EU over banned Russia TV channels
  2. EU holding €23bn of Russian bank reserves
  3. Russia speeds up passport process in occupied Ukraine
  4. Palestinian civil society denounce Metsola's Israel visit
  5. Johnson refuses to resign after Downing Street parties report
  6. EU border police has over 2,000 agents deployed
  7. Dutch tax authorities to admit to institutional racism
  8. Rutte calls for EU pension and labour reforms

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic delegation visits Nordic Bridges in Canada
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersClear to proceed - green shipping corridors in the Nordic Region
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers agree on international climate commitments
  4. UNESDA - SOFT DRINKS EUROPEEfficient waste collection schemes, closed-loop recycling and access to recycled content are crucial to transition to a circular economy in Europe
  5. UiPathNo digital future for the EU without Intelligent Automation? Online briefing Link

Latest News

  1. EU summit will be 'unwavering' on arms for Ukraine
  2. Orbán's new state of emergency under fire
  3. EU parliament prevaricates on barring Russian lobbyists
  4. Ukraine lawyer enlists EU watchdog against Russian oil
  5. Right of Reply: Hungarian government
  6. When Reagan met Gorbachev — a history lesson for Putin
  7. Orbán oil veto to deface EU summit on Ukraine
  8. France aims for EU minimum-tax deal in June

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us