Tuesday

26th Oct 2021

Opinion

The trans-Atlantic scramble for free trade deals

  • The Europeanists would also like the US-EU deal to balance Washington’s pivot to Asia. (Photo: European People's Party)

A recent paper by the European Council for Foreign Relations (ECFR) urges European policy makers to conclude Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) talks quickly by dropping the more contentious issues such as the investor-state dispute settlement.

Opposition to this clause – which allows companies to take legal action against governments if their decisions risk undermining their investments- is strongest in Germany but also rising in France and the UK.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • As opposition against the US-EU deal is building in Europe, President Obama needs a legacy deal. (Photo: White House)

US President Barack Obama in his State of the Union speech used tough words to press for the completion of the US-led Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement without China – and if necessary, by currency friction.

What’s the common denominator between the accelerated efforts to have the TTIP accepted in Brussels, the opposition to the deal, and President Obama’s hurry?

Well, as opposition against the US-EU deal is building in Europe, Brussels is growing anxious while President Obama needs a legacy deal.

Headwinds against US-EU TTIP

President Obama initiated the TTIP talks in early 2013. Brussels politicians at the time seized on the opportunity.

And yet the US-EU talks began only two years after President Obama’s key visit to Asia and talks for the trans-Pacific deal.

In addition, today’s new EU leaders are less certain and more divided about their objectives, while the Democratic White House is constrained by the Republican-controlled Congress.

As the US-EU talks have dragged out longer than anticipated, transatlantic goals are facing head winds across Europe as governments struggle with critics to further free trade, which is opposed by radical left and right, eurosceptics and part of the mainstream consensus.

The advocates of the proposed US-EU agreement argue that the economic gains of the partnership exceed the political headaches of the process.

The European Commission says that the TTIP would boost the EU's economy by €120 billion, the US by €90 billion and the rest of the world by €100 billion.

Brussels is pushing for a quick deal because it does not want to be left out in the cold as larger regional trade blocs are emerging. Europeanists in Brussels believe a US-EU deal is needed to balance Washington’s turn towards Asia.

Friction over US-Asia TPP

Historically, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) originates from a 2005 free trade agreement among Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore.

Since 2010, Washington has led to talks for a significantly expanded FTA, which is to be a “high-standard, broad-based regional pact” and which reflects US alliances in Asia and Latin America – but excludes China.

It leaves a strong sense of déjà vu.

In the early 1990s, the proposed Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) failed to open South America to free trade, but effectively split the region. Today, the TPP, in its current form, has the potential to polarise Asia into two blocs.

In the mid-1990s, APEC leaders opted for free trade and investment. In 2006, C. Fred Bergsten, then chief of an influential US think-tank, made a forceful statement in favour of the Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific (FTAAP), arguing it would represent the largest single liberalisation in history.

The Obama Administration then set the FTAAP aside and has been focused on the trans-Pacific deal for which Michael Froman, the US Trade Representative, is seeking congressional support.

China’s view, on the other hand, is that the FTAAP, which includes both the US and China, would better serve as a foundation for other regional talks.

Behind the facade, Washington and Beijing are also exploring possible compromises.

Negative scenarios

Initially, the TTIP’s objective was to unleash the full potential of the transatlantic economy. Even more compelling than the benefits of achieving an agreement are the potentially devastating consequences of failure.

Failure, say Europeanists in Brussels, could alienate the US engagement from the continent while if a trans-Pacific deal moves ahead instead, the global balance will tip in Asia’s favour.

The argument sounds compelling, but it is predicated on a win-lose world: If Asia wins, Europe loses.

The cause of Europe’s decline is not linked to success in Asia, but failure to implement timely structural reforms in the Old Continent.

Europe’s economic role in the world economy is in decline. This trend will be exacerbated if Brussels fails to deepen economic ties with the US – or if European companies fail to expand their presence in China and emerging Asia.

The White House has its own nightmare scenarios. If the Obama administration fails to complete the trade talks with Brussels, that would reinforce the perception that transatlantic cooperation is a relic of the past.

If the US administration fails to complete the trade talks in Asia Pacific, America would again be on the sidelines as trade and investment take off in Asia Pacific.

President Obama’s legacy would be threatened, and the 2016 presidential election would delay new talks.

The worst outcome for the White House would be if it failed in both sets of trade talks.

In that case, the White House would have to reach for diluted deals.

In the final analysis, the transatlantic scramble for free-trade deals may be less about free trade and more about evolving trade in the multipolar world economy.

Dr Dan Steinbock is research director of international business at the India, China and America Institute (USA) and a visiting fellow at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and EU-Centre (Singapore).

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU-US trade talks in 'troubled waters'

EU-US trade talks are “in troubled waters” and need a “fresh start for parliament to approve an agreement”, its trade committee chairman has said.

Magazine

TTIP's teflon coat wears thin

The prospect of an EU-US trade agreement was one of relatively few sources of comfort for EU lawmakers about the bloc's struggling economy in 2013.

How to break the political deadlock on migration

We propose a mandatory solidarity mechanism that allows for flexible options. Every member state will have to contribute in one way or another - through either relocation, return sponsorship or capacity-building measures, writes EPP rapporteur Tomas Tobé MEP.

Lessons for the EU in Sahel, from Afghanistan

Former UK ambassador to Mali and Niger, who also served in Kabul, reflects on the implications of the Taliban's victory in Afghanistan for EU policy in the Sahel.

Europe can't ignore Chinese encroachment in Ukraine

China's growing economic footprint in Ukraine may already be producing geopolitical consequences that put the country at odds with core European priorities. Volodymyr Zelensky decided earlier this year to withdraw Ukraine's condemnation of Chinese government crimes against the Uighurs.

MEPs poised to vote blank cheque for Europol using AI tools

Fair Trials, EDRi and other civil society organisations are calling on MEPs to hold true to protect our fundamental rights. We urge MEPs to vote against the revision of Europol's mandate, which distinctly lacks meaningful accountability and safeguards.

Column

Nothing as destructive as radical change

With Poland throwing the legal order of Europe in disarray, Russia rationing Europe's gas supply and the UK reneging on its Brexit commitments, perhaps the moment has come again to read a few essays by French philosopher Michel de Montaigne.

EU Green Deal is too dependent on private finance

What we call for is another approach to the financing of the European Grean Deal. While a lot of attention is being paid to decarbonisation, the other two aspects - de-financialisation and democratisation - are largely ignored.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNew report reveals bad environmental habits
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersImproving the integration of young refugees
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNATO Secretary General guest at the Session of the Nordic Council
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCan you love whoever you want in care homes?
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNineteen demands by Nordic young people to save biodiversity
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersSustainable public procurement is an effective way to achieve global goals

Latest News

  1. How to break the political deadlock on migration
  2. Hedegaard on the hazards of stalling climate action
  3. Belarus exiles in EU fear regime-linked murderers
  4. No place for Polish 'war' rhetoric, Commission says
  5. Nine countries oppose EU gas market reform
  6. EU-UK impasse on top court in post-Brexit customs talks
  7. Erdoğan orders out US and EU ambassadors
  8. EU banks play 'major role' in deforestation, report finds

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us