Friday

18th Jan 2019

Opinion

It's time to ditch EU anti-Uber business rules

  • Uber will be able to dodge those draconian occupational regulations beloved by the taxi industry if the ECJ rules that the company is a digital service (Photo: drpavloff)

It has been a challenging year for Uber in Europe. So far the company has seen its flagship services banned, offices raided and top executives heading to trial. Worse, Uber has also faced a number of bizarre regulatory proposals such as a mandatory five-minute wait, which, of course, is fundamentally antithetical to its modus operandi.

Is there a way out of this mess?

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

Enter the European Court of Justice. Referring a case on Uber to the EU’s highest court, a Barcelona judge has triggered the process that might potentially end Uber’s Europe woes. The ECJ will now have to decide whether Uber is a transport company ("mere transport activity") or a digital service ("an electronic intermediation or information society service").

While it may seem like a false dilemma (anyone vaguely familiar with Uber will know that it is both a transport company and a digital service), that distinction will spell the future of the Silicon Valley firm in Europe—if declared a transport company, Uber will be subject to the rigid national regulations on transport; if declared a digital service, on the other hand, favourable EU digital market rules will apply.

Will the ECJ ruling solve the regulatory ambiguity? One would hope so. But there is a frustrating challenge: in their legal interpretation of Uber, the court is confined to the current framework of regulations that does not quite capture the eclectic essence of innovation and therefore puts the sharing companies in an awkward position with the regulators.

"Outdated rules—such as return to garage regulations or minimum price and duration—are being used across the EU to squash competition, which would benefit consumers and help stimulate jobs," said Uber’s former top lobbyist Mark McGann. He is not alone in that view.

Describing the EU market as "insufficiently innovation-friendly", the European Commission considers "outdated regulations and procedures" as an obstacle to innovation in Europe. But it seems as if the commission shies away from hinting at any specific regulation standing in the way of innovation.

Perhaps the mother of all those outdated regulations, and the source of Uber’s greatest worries in Europe, is occupational licensing. Put simply, it is a form of government-mandated permission to work in a particular field. When a particular profession is licensed, aspiring workers need to jump over a number of entry barriers to earn the licence.

To understand how ridiculously outdated occupational licensing laws can be, just consider London’s licensing regulations for taxi drivers. If you want to become black-cab driver in London, you will have to spend some serious time training for the infamous Knowledge of London test which covers London’s 25,000 streets, 20,000 landmarks and 320 basic routes, not to mention the total application costs coming to ‎£900. Now compare this to Uber’s low-barrier recruitment method, which the taxi drivers accuse of imposing unfair competition in the sector.

In Europe, there are 5,500 professions that require a licence to practise (‘regulated professions’ in the eurojargon). While the effects of occupational licensing on the labour market have been well-studied in the United States, it is so remarkably neglected in Europe that a recent UK government-commissioned study found no substantial European research to cite in its literature review.

As the usual policy justification goes, the purpose of occupational licensing is about public safety and consumer protection. But the research suggests this is a suspect claim.

Only two of 12 reviewed studies in a White House paper on occupational licensing find a positive link between stricter licensing and better safety. Most research findings show that the net impact of those regulations is negative – nine out of 11 reviewed studies show that occupational licences drive up the consumer prices.

There is one particular reason why the industries insist on stricter enforcement of occupational licensing rules. As Paul J Larkin Jr argues in Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy: "The effect of licensing is to create a cartel that supplies its members with economic rents on an ongoing basis because entry restrictions operate like a 'hidden subsidy' to licensees."

Uber will be able to dodge those draconian occupational regulations beloved by the taxi industry if the ECJ rules that the company is a digital service. Given past experience, however, it would be naively optimistic to assume that European taxi drivers will bow to such a ruling. Competition from Uber is still a competition, regardless of Uber’s declared legal status.

That is exactly why focusing on the ECJ ruling and the legal distinction matters less than shifting our attention to the European public policy’s elephant in the room. If the European Commission is serious about targeting outdated regulations, then occupational licensing is the right target. It is not just the future of Uber at stake here, but the future of innovation and entrepreneurship in Europe.

Ekin Genç is affiliated with the Ankara-based Freedom Research Association and currently based in Washington, D.C. through a policy fellowship. His previous writings were published in Bloomberg Businessweek in Turkey.

Magazine

EU cities try their own 'Ubers'

As some places struggle to deal with the impact of firms like Uber and Airbnb, other cities are embracing the change and seeking to learn.

Focus

Uber: Goodbye Denmark, but not farewell

Ride-sharing service Uber has announced it will shut down activities in Denmark in protest over a new law introducing the same requirements for Uber as for other taxi services.

How to troll the European Parliament elections

The May 2019 European parliament elections will take place in a context which make a very promising ground for protest votes and extreme views, aided by bots and algorithms.

News in Brief

  1. EU trade commissioner asks for green light for US talks
  2. Slovakia's commissioner takes unpaid leave to run for presidency
  3. Minority elects Lofven as prime minister of Sweden
  4. Putin opposes EU prospects of Serbia and Kosovo
  5. Tsipras launches campaign to ratify Macedonia deal
  6. US-EU meeting in doubt after Trump cancels plane
  7. Germany and China to sign pact on finance cooperation
  8. Labour divided on second Brexit vote plan

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Partnership For Human RightsKyrgyz authorities have to immediately release human rights defender Azimjon Askarov
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersSeminar on disability and user involvement
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersInternational appetite for Nordic food policies
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Nordic Innovation House in Hong Kong
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Region has chance to become world leader when it comes to start-ups
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersTheresa May: “We will not be turning our backs on the Nordic region”
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsOpen letter to Emmanuel Macron ahead of Uzbek president's visit
  8. International Partnership for Human RightsRaising key human rights concerns during visit of Turkmenistan's foreign minister
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersState of the Nordic Region presented in Brussels
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersThe vital bioeconomy. New issue of “Sustainable Growth the Nordic Way” out now
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic gender effect goes international
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersPaula Lehtomaki from Finland elected as the Council's first female Secretary General

Latest News

  1. Germany led way on EU human rights protection
  2. How to troll the European Parliament elections
  3. MEPs in Strasbourg: everywhere but the plenary
  4. Brexit delay 'reasonable', as May tries cross-party talks
  5. MEPs allow Draghi's membership of secretive bank group
  6. EU parliament backs Morocco deal despite row
  7. Barnier open to 'future relations' talks if UK red lines shift
  8. German spies to monitor far-right AfD party

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic design sets the stage at COP24, running a competition for sustainable chairs
  2. Counter BalanceIn Kenya, a motorway funded by the European Investment Bank runs over roadside dwellers
  3. ACCACompany Law Package: Making the Best of Digital and Cross Border Mobility,
  4. International Partnership for Human RightsCivil Society Worried About Shortcomings in EU-Kyrgyzstan Human Rights Dialogue
  5. UNESDAThe European Soft Drinks Industry Supports over 1.7 Million Jobs
  6. Mission of China to the EUJointly Building Belt and Road Initiative Leads to a Better Future for All
  7. International Partnership for Human RightsCivil society asks PACE to appoint Rapporteur to probe issue of political prisoners in Azerbaijan
  8. ACCASocial Mobility – How Can We Increase Opportunities Through Training and Education?
  9. Nordic Council of MinistersEnergy Solutions for a Greener Tomorrow
  10. UNICEFWhat Kind of Europe Do Children Want? Unicef & Eurochild Launch Survey on the Europe Kids Want
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Countries Take a Stand for Climate-Smart Energy Solutions
  12. Mission of China to the EUChina: Work Together for a Better Globalisation

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us