Tuesday

28th Mar 2023

Opinion

EU election observers play vital role

  • The opposition leader, Raila Odinga, decided to go to the courts (Photo: EUobserver)

International election observation has taken a beating in the past few days.

The Kenyan Supreme Court's decision on 8 August to nullify the presidential elections and call for a re-run has caused many in the media and beyond to question the usefulness of international election observation.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • Reports that observers rubber-stamped the election are untrue (Photo: Commonwealth Secretariat)

Critics have noted that all election observer missions on the ground, including the EU mission, provided relatively positive initial post-election statements on the process, released prior to the completion of the tabulation process.

The perception of many critics after the Supreme Court decision is that the EU and other missions were supporting the incumbent through their statements, and ignoring the election's flaws.

The murder of a key election official in charge of the electronic tabulation system, just prior to the election, only reinforced this viewpoint.

At a moment of high emotion, it is important however to consider the facts, rather than be carried away by perception.

The court decision should not mean a wholesale dismissal of the findings of EU and other election observers, and call into question more broadly the basis for international election observation.

Facts

Let us carefully examine the facts.

The court did not question the results.

Although we cannot be certain without the final detailed ruling, the Supreme Court does not appear to cast doubt on the outcome itself, but rather on problems with the electronic results transmission system.

As the official results showed the incumbent Uhuru Kenyatta 1.4 million votes ahead of Raila Odinga (a wide, 10 percent margin of victory), it is rather unlikely that the outcome would be affected by any flaws in the transmission process, especially as the results announced were based on the tabulation of paper forms at the constituency tallying centres.

Typically courts nullify elections only if there is evidence that the outcome would have been materially affected by identified irregularities.

Observers did not rubber-stamp the elections. While the EU's observer mission, as well as others, gave a cautiously positive assessment of election day in its preliminary statement released 48 hours after elections, it also provided plenty of criticism on various aspects of the overall election process to date.

At that stage, the EU mission deliberately refrained from commenting on the tallying process, as it was only just beginning, and noted this in its press conference.

The EU mission's concern regarding the lack of transparency in the results transmission - necessary for checking the veracity of totals - was demonstrated later in its statement on 16 August urging the Independent Election and Boundary Commission (IEBC) to publish all result forms.

This is essential for checking the results and to enable all stakeholders, not just parties, to file petitions. The mission's final report will also undoubtedly critique the electronic tabulation system.

Reports that observers rubber-stamped the election are simply untrue.

Threat of violence

Prevention of electoral violence was a priority.

Of course, following the post-election violence that followed the 2007 election process, international and national actors alike have been concerned not to see a repeat of the violence and have taken steps to mitigate this risk.

The joint statement on 9 August, of all international election observer missions present, showed their united commitment to the constitutional route, urging Odinga to seek redress through the courts rather than going to the streets.

The African Union election observation mission played a key role in this regard, bringing together all international observer missions.

Indeed, the fact that this case was brought to the Supreme Court at all is at least partially due to the successful efforts of international election observers.

The electronic tabulation process was always a concern. Although the court's detailed ruling has not yet been released, the preliminary ruling appears to cast doubt on the electronic results transmission system.

The electronic results transmission system was identified by many as a risk in the election process.

The international observer community has long cautioned that new technologies should only be adopted where there is political consensus on their introduction and then should be gradually implemented through pilot testing, which was unfortunately not the case in Kenya.

Observers have consistently called for more transparency in the process, and for accountability of external private vendors.

Paper trail

The paper trail is what counts.

In case electronic systems fail, it is the paper back-up system that provides a reliable tally of results. In Kenya, the back-up system for tabulation consists of the result forms that are sent physically from the polling station to the constituency tallying centres.

These paper forms were used as the basis for announcing official results totals.

Once concerns arose about the electronic results transmission, observation missions called for the release of scans of all result forms so that everyone could confirm the results, independent of the electronic transmission.

In addition to the aggregation of the result forms by the IEBC, Kenya's leading domestic observers, the Election Observer Group (ELOG), conducted a parallel vote tabulation - a statistical projection of results based on actual result forms - confirming the officially announced results within a percentage point.

This gave further backing to the officially announced results.

No election is perfect, and it is the delicate job of an observer mission to consider every election against international and regional standards, but also in its specific context.

An election observer mission may identify flaws in an election and still assess it to be credible and democratic. It is a formidable challenge to collect information from around the country and throughout the process and reflect it in a concisely written statement in a short time-frame.

Some commentators have said that releasing statements 48 hours after election day, when the tabulation process was not yet complete, was not responsible.

However, the EU and other observer missions emphasised that their statements were preliminary in nature and that their teams were continuing to watch the process unfold.

Time pressure

It is already difficult for international observers to wait 48 hours to announce their findings - as is common practice - as national and international media, as well as the public, are waiting impatiently for their assessments.

International media in particular tend to move on quickly after an election.

Diplomats and capitals also wait for the pronouncements of election observers before commenting on the process.

Election observer missions continue their work, however, with teams closely following post-election developments throughout the country, whose findings are reflected both in interim reports - providing periodic updates and final reports issued two months later.

All election observer missions present in Kenya urged competitors to use the official legal remedies to lodge any complaints.

That Odinga decided to go to the courts and that the court gave his complaint due consideration is a positive indicator of Kenya's democracy.

It is not, however, a reason to condemn the practice of international election observation.

Holly Ruthrauff is an independent Brussels-based election expert who sometimes takes part in EU observation missions and who advises EU institutions.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU alarmed at post-election violence in Kenya

The European Union has cast doubt over Kenya's presidential election results and urged local leaders to prevent violence and uphold the country's status as a "model of democracy in an already fragile region."

Macron wants asylum claims to start in Africa

The French president hosted a mini-summit with leaders from Chad, Libya and Niger, along with Germany, Italy and Spain. Among the proposals is a plan to set up safe zones in Niger and Chad to initiate asylum claims.

Dear EU, the science is clear: burning wood for energy is bad

The EU and the bioenergy industry claim trees cut for energy will regrow, eventually removing extra CO2 from the atmosphere. But regrowth is not certain, and takes time, decades or longer. In the meantime, burning wood makes climate change worse.

Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity

From the perspective of international relations, the EU is a rare bird indeed. Theoretically speaking it cannot even exist. The charter of the United Nations, which underlies the current system of global governance, distinguishes between states and organisations of states.

Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity

From the perspective of international relations, the EU is a rare bird indeed. Theoretically speaking it cannot even exist. The charter of the United Nations, which underlies the current system of global governance, distinguishes between states and organisations of states.

How much can we trust Russian opinion polls on the war?

The lack of Russian opposition to the Russo-Ukrainian War is puzzling. The war is going nowhere, Russian casualties are staggering, the economy is in trouble, and living standards are declining, and yet polls indicate that most Russians support the war.

Latest News

  1. Dear EU, the science is clear: burning wood for energy is bad
  2. Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity
  3. Finnish elections and Hungary's Nato vote in focus This WEEK
  4. EU's new critical raw materials act could be a recipe for conflict
  5. Okay, alright, AI might be useful after all
  6. Von der Leyen pledges to help return Ukrainian children
  7. EU leaders agree 1m artillery shells for Ukraine
  8. Polish abortion rights activist vows to appeal case

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality
  5. Promote UkraineInvitation to the National Demonstration in solidarity with Ukraine on 25.02.2023
  6. Azerbaijan Embassy9th Southern Gas Corridor Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting and 1st Green Energy Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us