Tuesday

15th Jun 2021

Opinion

Nordic states urge U-turn on EU digital tax plans

  • In March 2018 the EU Commission made two proposals for directives introducing special tax rules for the digital economy. (Photo: Rami Al-zayat)

Digitalisation has led to discussions in the EU and on a global level on how the existing tax rules work in relation to new business models.

For us, it is important to ensure that everyone pays their taxes, digital companies as well as all others.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • The EU directives would shift taxing rights to the country of the consumer. (Photo: George Hodan)

The Nordic countries are generally at the forefront of the global fight against tax avoidance, and have actively participated in the work done within the EU and in the OECD to combat base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). And we remain ready to do more on this issue.

We note that the recent US tax reform with its Global Intangible Low Tax Income (GILTI) provision should precisely address issues of tax avoidance by US digital companies, by ensuring a minimum taxation of 13 percent on profits from foreign sales, which previously could often go untaxed for a long time.

This is an important contribution to securing a level playing field between US and European companies.

Taxing the digital economy

In March 2018 the European Commission made two proposals for directives introducing special tax rules for the digital economy.

We welcome and support the active EU engagement in the discussion on counteracting base erosion and profit shifting in light of digitalisation, but note that the two proposals are mainly about changing the current rules for allocating taxable income between countries, for the digital economy, rather than fighting tax avoidance.

The proposals partly shift taxing rights to the country of the consumer or the digital user, based on the premise that these contribute to value creation in the digital economy.

This deviates from internationally established principles.

Traditionally, exporting firms do not pay taxes in their export destination simply because they have consumers there.

The proposal for a digital services tax means that basically all value creation is deemed to take place at the location of the consumer.

Furthermore, a digital services tax deviates from fundamental principles of income taxation by applying the tax on gross income, i.e. without regard to whether the taxpayer is making a profit or not.

Such substantial changes to the current international principles need to be discussed and agreed internationally.

Complicating international cooperation

If we in the EU unilaterally apply a digital services tax on gross income, including to non-EU firms, the tax will be difficult to enforce and there is a substantial risk that it will complicate international cooperation in the tax area.

Furthermore, it seems unlikely that third countries would quietly accept isolated EU actions in this area without introducing corresponding measures for taxing companies of EU member states.

In the end, we would risk moving to a general destination-based allocation of taxing rights, which is not in the interest of the EU.

We believe there are no reasons to deviate from internationally established principles regarding the allocation of taxing rights for the digital economy.

The digital economy as well as the traditional economy should be taxed where value is created.

Therefore, there should be a thorough analysis whether and to what extent, users in some specific digital business models contribute by creating value for the business and whether this should be somehow reflected in taxation.

This analysis needs to reach a certain international consensus to be effective, and so a substantial part of it must again be done in the OECD.

The Nordic countries will continue to participate actively and constructively in such work, and we would support an acceleration of the OECD discussions on this topic, so that we can find a consensus-based solution rapidly.

Favourable climate for business

In these discussions, we must also keep in mind the crucial part innovation and research and development play in creating value for businesses and growth and welfare in general.

A system based on where the users are located must not reduce the incentives for states to provide a favourable climate for business.

Digitalisation is changing the world swiftly and in the future it is bound to affect also the businesses we now see as traditional ones.

Our aim is to guarantee that all businesses - new and old, more or less digital, national and international - are taxed in a similar efficient and fair matter, based on where value is created, so that the Nordic countries and the rest of the EU remain competitive in an increasingly interconnected and digital word.

The OECD BEPS project has in the recent years delivered significant results in the fight against tax avoidance, showing that global cooperation on tax matters is not only desirable, but also possible.

Crucial BEPS initiatives are now being implemented in both EU and the US helping to counter tax avoidance by for instance the digital giants.

We are convinced that global cooperation needs to be given a real chance to succeed also when it comes to digital taxation.

Magdalena Andersson is Sweden's finance minister, Kristian Jensen is minister for finance in Denmark and Petteri Orpo is FInland's minister of finance.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU leaders set for 'stormy debate' on digital tax at summit

A proposal by the European Commission will be discussed on Thursday night at the EU summit, with member states divided over the principle of taxing tech companies - amidst ongoing concerns of a trade war with the US.

The great EU corporate tax lie

Attempts by the European Commission to 'sell' the new Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base as a measure against tax avoidance are disingenuous at best, say three MEPs from smaller member states.

News in Brief

  1. BBC and others boycott Belarus press circus
  2. Report: EU and US to unveil aircraft subsidy truce
  3. Putin refuses to guarantee Navalny will survive jail
  4. Erdoğan agrees to pull out mercenaries from Libya
  5. EU starts sale of first bonds for Covid-19 recovery fund
  6. Germans told not to 'storm pharmacies' for Covid pass
  7. Indonesia warns Covid-19 wave may not peak until July
  8. WTO chief: 'drop trade barriers on Covid-19 treatments'

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNineteen demands by Nordic young people to save biodiversity
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersSustainable public procurement is an effective way to achieve global goals
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council enters into formal relations with European Parliament
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersWomen more active in violent extremist circles than first assumed
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersDigitalisation can help us pick up the green pace
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCOVID19 is a wake-up call in the fight against antibiotic resistance

Latest News

  1. China officially joins Russia as a danger to Nato
  2. German Greens face reality check amid CDU gains
  3. EU Parliament wants Europe to take lead on sea-rescues
  4. MEPs urged to end gas-funding, fix cross-border projects rules
  5. Biden in Brussels - what's in the 'in-tray'?
  6. Yemen foreign minister to EU: to stop the war, talk to Iran
  7. Brexit grumbles overshadow UK summit
  8. Former French PM to work for Russian oil firm

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us