Sunday

17th Oct 2021

Opinion

My plan for defending rule of law in EU

  • The framers of the European treaties focused on entry conditions for prospective member states - but they did not foresee a mechanism to ensure the respect and maintenance of the rules long-term (Photo: European Parliament)

For a long time it seemed a given that the fundamental liberal order and European integration went hand in hand.

Throughout Europe today, however, that principle is being questioned.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Two EU member states, Poland and Hungary, are the subject of a procedure meant to establish whether there is clear risk of serious breach of the values of the European Union.

In many other member states, violations of EU law, corruption and attempts to manipulate justice are on the rise.

Faced with these realities, it is clear the European Union is poorly equipped.

The framers of the European treaties focused on entry conditions for prospective member states; but they did not foresee a mechanism to ensure the respect and maintenance of the rules long-term: i.e. for states already members of the club.

There is of course the procedure provided under Article 7 of the Union treaty.

This option, though, turns out to be in fact inadequate and difficult, and to take too long to implement.

I am convinced that the only way for Europe to establish itself for the future as a community of law, to establish its authority and credibility, is to have effective instruments to ensure and protect the rule of law.

For me, only an independent body — protected from political pressure, transparent and effective, and above all having as its scope every member state, without exception — can fulfil this role.

New nine-judge panel

I propose the establishment of a committee of independent experts: composed of former judges, recognised figures from the highest national and European courts.

These experts, no more than nine, would be tasked with regularly reviewing the state of play of the independence of the judiciary and freedom of the press; they would also investigate potential political, judicial and administrative corruption — in every member state of the European Union.

The committee would have its own resources for investigation.

In its conclusions, it should propose concrete solutions to the problems identified — but should also outline sanctions in case these problems are not resolved.

For example, obtaining European funds by any member state would be conditional upon the conclusion of the report concerning it.

In case of corruption or infringement of the press, the structural funds intended for the state in question could be frozen or reduced.

Should the committee bring to light serious suspicions concerning the rule of law in a given member state, the European Commission should continue the investigation.

In the event of serious violations, an automatic referral to the European Court of Justice would ensue.

In case of conviction by the Court of Justice, the European Commission could propose to the European Parliament and the European Council that sanctions be imposed against the respective member state.

This decision to sanction could not be stopped but by majority vote (even by a qualified majority) in one of the two institutions.

Lacking such a majority, the proposed decision would take effect automatically following the verdict of the Court of Justice.

Such a control mechanism would allow a swift and effective defence against the erosion of structures guaranteeing the rule of law — in a depoliticised and irrefutable way.

I am convinced that with such an instrument, we would be able to meet the challenges we face today and effectively defend our basic principles and values.

A German-language version of this op-ed first appeared in Frankfurter Algemeneine Sontagszeitung.

Author bio

Manfred Weber is a Christian Social Union MEP from Bavaria, leader of the European People's Party group in the European Parliament, and lead candidate of the EPP for the EU Commission presidency.

Udo di Fabio is a former judge on the German Constitutional Court.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Orban says 'sorry', EPP says 'not enough'

As the European People's Party braces itself to decide next week whether to expel its Hungarian member, prime minister Viktor Orban says sorry for calling his critics "useful idiots".

Orban hosts Weber in Budapest for EPP showdown

The future of the Viktor Orban's Fidesz party inside the European Parliament's centre-right EPP political group hangs in the balance. On Tuesday, Orban and EPP chief Manfred Weber meet in Budapest in a final effort to iron out differences.

Manfred Weber and the art of passive resistance

Hungary's government dismantled rule of law institutions and democratic guarantees in broad daylight. This could have been perfectly addressed by Weber's European People's Party years ago - but it dithered.

EU countries push for new rule of law surveillance

Germany and Belgium have put forward a proposal for a "peer review" of EU countries' legal systems as member states and EU institutions struggle with disciplining member states that break EU rules.

Macron is confusing rigidity with strength

Jan Zahradil, EU Commission president Spitzenkandidat for the European Conservatives and Reformists Group, responds to Emmaneul Macron's European vision ahead of the May elections.

News in Brief

  1. Poland legalises refugee pushbacks
  2. Report: China's Xi to snub UK climate summit
  3. Norway killings 'appeared to be' Islamist 'terrorism'
  4. Le Pen vows to 'dismantle' wind-power plants
  5. Slovenia PM tweets antisemitic conspiracy theory
  6. Italy sentences ship captain for Libya pushback
  7. Polish PM and von der Leyen to clash in Brussels next week
  8. MEPs call for improved roaming rules

Time for EU to grow up as a democracy

Conference on the Future of Europe must address shortcomings in the EU model of 'dual democracy' and prevent backsliding in member states.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNew report reveals bad environmental habits
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersImproving the integration of young refugees
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNATO Secretary General guest at the Session of the Nordic Council
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCan you love whoever you want in care homes?
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNineteen demands by Nordic young people to save biodiversity
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersSustainable public procurement is an effective way to achieve global goals

Latest News

  1. MEPs urge Sassoli to sue EU Commission on rule of law
  2. MEPs seek EU law on bogus anti-media litigation
  3. Africa seeks EU help on global vaccine-waiver
  4. Giant of 20th century European design recognised by EU
  5. Italy on edge as neo-fascists stir violence
  6. Gas-price spike will backfire on industry, energy guru says
  7. Scientists raise alarm on Greenland's ice-sheet loss
  8. EU calls for ban on Arctic oil and gas drilling

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us