Wednesday

29th Mar 2023

Opinion

Inconvenient Facebook truths ahead of EU election

  • Facebook's new policy creates a major barrier to the exercise of both EU electoral rights (which are by definition pan-EU) and free movement rights (such as cross-border advertising) (Photo: Spencer E Holtaway)

After revelations on how third countries and unidentified organisations sponsored targeted content during the 2016 Brexit referendum, Facebook has put in place new rules for political advertisement in all EU member states.

Under these new rules, paid political content is only allowed in the country where the ad buyer is based in.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

While this might make sense in the United States, such an approach is not fit for purpose in a jurisdiction like Europe, which is made of 28 countries.

As a result of those rules, EU political parties are prevented from using Facebook, Facebook Messenger and lnstagram for their EU-wide paid communication campaigns.

These new rules affect not only EU political parties, but also the EU institutions themselves as well as hundreds of not-for-profit organisations and citizens movements currently running get-out-to-vote campaigns across the continent.

In other words, any European organisation whose members and constituency extend beyond one country is put at the same level as foreign entities attempting to interfere in the EU elections.

In so doing, Facebook denies the pan-European dimension of the European elections that stems from our unique EU-wide constitutional arrangement.

Facebook's new policy creates a major barrier to the exercise of both EU electoral rights (which are by definition pan-EU) and free movement rights (such as cross-border advertising).

What is worse is that Facebook new policy also fails to make the European elections more secure.

Indeed, any influencer – be it inside or outside of the EU – who wants to sway the EU elections can still buy political ads at the national level and reach out all Europeans.

This is deeply troubling, all the more so less than 30 days ahead of the European elections.

This story unveils three disturbing, inconvenient truths.

First, the European Union, like any other governmental authority, is highly dependent on Facebook and similar platforms to reach out to the public.

The Facebook network ecosystem – made of Messenger, Instagram as well as WhatsApp – emerges as an inescapable infrastructure for governments when discharging their own prerogatives.

These range from organising the vote, informing the public about their electoral rights, and mobilise citizens to vote.

In other words, the EU, its governments and political parties need Facebook to do their job.

Second, while this should ring an alarm bell to any government and political candidate ahead of the European elections, they all seem deaf to such a call.

Today any policymaker faces an inherent conflict of interest insofar as she is expected to govern Facebook while being reliant on it to get re-elected.

Who sets the rules?

The third inconvenient truth is that it's Facebook – not our governments – to set the rules of the democratic game.

It is Facebook that defines what qualifies as a political ad, and who may promote it.

And, again, it is Facebook that police those self-imposed rules, acting as a gate-keeper to its network infrastructure, but without being subject to a corresponding public scrutiny. In sum, in the absence of any regulation, Facebook is acting a de facto regulator of European public discourse ahead and beyond the next European elections.

Yet Facebook's license to govern itself and our societies is not, as a matter of fact, the inevitable result of impersonal forces such as globalisation or automation.

Rather it stems from a deliberate political choice made by our political representatives to let them self-regulate their operation, regardless of the manifest externalities of their action.

I can't imagine a more challenging yet needed task for the incoming members of the European Parliament to take up.

Author bio

Alberto Alemanno is Jean Monnet Professor of EU law and founder of The Good Lobby.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU want Facebook pan-EU advert fix for May elections

EU institutions want Facebook to relax its rules, to allow pan-European political groups to carry out EU-wide campaigns. Facebook has yet to implement the demands - posing questions on the extent to which Europe relies on the US tech firm.

Facebook launches EU election transparency rules

Political ads in the EU are to be labelled as having been "paid for by" and restricted to their home countries, US tech giant Facebook has said ahead of elections in May.

EU tells platforms to sort fake news by October or face new law

The European Commission wants results by October against fake news - or it may impose regulations targeting "a few platforms." But its current plans are not acceptable to everyone, with civil groups saying more evidence is needed to shape policy.

Facebook has to answer some tough questions about Libra

German MEP and member of the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, Markus Ferber, warns of four separate threats from Facebook's Libra. A good moment to kick off the debate would be this week's G20 summit.

Six takeaways on digital disinformation at EU elections

For example, Germany's primetime TV news reported that 47 percent of political social media discussions were related to the extreme-right AfD party, when in fact this was the case only for Twitter - used by only four percent of Germans.

Column

What does China really want? Perhaps we could try asking

Perhaps even more surprising to the West was the fact that the Iran-Saudi Arabia deal was not brokered by the United States, or the European Union, but by the People's Republic of China. Since when was China mediating peace agreements?

Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity

From the perspective of international relations, the EU is a rare bird indeed. Theoretically speaking it cannot even exist. The charter of the United Nations, which underlies the current system of global governance, distinguishes between states and organisations of states.

Latest News

  1. EU approves 2035 phaseout of polluting cars and vans
  2. New measures to shield the EU against money laundering
  3. What does China really want? Perhaps we could try asking
  4. Dear EU, the science is clear: burning wood for energy is bad
  5. Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity
  6. Finnish elections and Hungary's Nato vote in focus This WEEK
  7. EU's new critical raw materials act could be a recipe for conflict
  8. Okay, alright, AI might be useful after all

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWWEFBWW and FIEC do not agree to any exemptions to mandatory prior notifications in construction
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality
  6. Promote UkraineInvitation to the National Demonstration in solidarity with Ukraine on 25.02.2023

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Azerbaijan Embassy9th Southern Gas Corridor Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting and 1st Green Energy Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting
  2. EFBWWEU Social Dialogue review – publication of the European Commission package and joint statement of ETUFs
  3. Oxfam InternationalPan Africa Program Progress Report 2022 - Post Covid and Beyond
  4. WWFWWF Living Planet Report
  5. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us