Friday

3rd Apr 2020

Opinion

Poland's PiS prepares 'failsafe' for October election

  • Poland's Sejm. The bill, tabled by PiS, makes a seemingly insignificant, yet potentially game-changing, modification to how election results are validated (or not) (Photo: Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

Poland's ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party doesn't shy away from the authoritarian playbook to secure their power.

While the battle with the European Commission over the rule of law rages on, PiS is discreetly trying to tweak electoral law in their favour.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or join as a group

Last summer's attempt to exclude smaller parties from winning European Parliament seats by raising the effective threshold to over 16 percent (with the EU's maximum being five percent) was - unexpectedly - struck down by president Andrzej Duda.

With the upcoming parliamentary elections, it's time for a sequel.

A new amendment to Poland's electoral code successfully passed its first reading in parliament last Wednesday (17 July).

The bill, tabled again by PiS, makes a seemingly insignificant, yet potentially game-changing, modification to how election results are validated (or not).

Until now, the validity of any elections in the country was determined by the employment, social security and public affairs chamber of the Supreme Court.

But the chamber was abolished with PiS's controversial 2017 bill.

According to the proposed law, this duty will now fall under the court's extraordinary control and public affairs chamber.

If this change seems like a technicality, don't be fooled. The new chamber, apart from a slightly shorter name, presents one significant advantage for the ruling party.

Its members are chosen by the National Council of the Judiciary (NCJ). This name might sound more familiar to the Brussels reader, as this is the body currently awaiting a preliminary ruling of the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

The court's advocate general had already stated in his opinion that the NCJ is "dependent on the executive and legislative branches", so the ruling will most likely follow the same line.

Indeed, out of the Council's 25 members, 15 are chosen by the Sejm, the lower chamber of parliament (with a PiS majority), with others being parliamentarians and even the PiS justice minister himself.

In practice, with the new law, the validity of elections can ultimately be decided by the ruling party and its cronies. If it sounds like authoritarian territory, that's because it is.

Heads or tails?

Opposition MP Jerzy Meysztowicz put it quite bluntly in his speech addressed to the ruling party: "The problem will be this: if you win the elections, that means they're fine, and if you lose them, you determine they were falsified.

"What guarantee do we have that when you lose the elections you won't question them and determine that sorry, but they didn't count? And who will be deciding that? It will be the extraordinary control and public affairs chamber, that you nominate yourselves. Brilliant solution!"

Professor Marcin Matczak, constitutional lawyer from Warsaw University, notices the anti-European aspect of PiS's bold move.

In an interview with Gazeta.pl he calls it an "example of very irresponsible policy-making of the government".

"We're members of a community governed by certain rules. Instead of attempting to constructively solve the issue, the PiS government makes a move hostile towards the EU - it raises the competence of a body with serious doubts around it" he said, referring to the ECJ's upcoming ruling.

"The government's actions are provocative" according to Matczak.

Indeed, if the European court's ruling confirms the serious doubts regarding the independence of the NCJ, chaos might ensue.

Even if the ECJ's ruling doesn't nullify all the NCJ's judge nominations to date (which would then put into question the validity of potentially thousands of cases they had already judged on), a European court finding the Supreme Court's new chamber invalid might easily be used as an argument in PiS's anti-EU rhetoric.

It will join their ongoing accusations of the EU messing with Poland's internal affairs, overshadowing the fact that it is Law and Justice itself which messes with the principles of democracy in the first place.

Ironically therefore, the ECJ's ruling safeguarding the rule of law might fuel PiS's justifications to abolish it.

While the opposition raises alarm, Matczak is cautiously hopeful.

"I see the mechanism of hijacking the NCJ to nominate a Supreme Court chamber, deciding in such a key issue as the validity of elections, as illegal and extremely harmful to democracy. They can be readying themselves 'just in case'.

"There's a risk of creating a tool that they can later use. But I know some of the members nominated to the control chamber and I believe that they are serious lawyers and will not let themselves be used politically".

Author bio

Martin Mycielski is a pro-democracy activist and former Brussels correspondent for Gazeta Wyborcza, and currently public affairs director at the Open Dialogue Foundation, an international NGO protecting human rights and the rule of law.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

PiS & Fidesz claim credit for von der Leyen victory

Warsaw and Budapest are boasting about their support for von der Leyen after the german is confirmed only by a small margin of MEPs, but the illiberals should not expect the softening of rule of law scrutiny.

Poland 'optimistic' despite new EU law checks

The European Commission is to propose annual rule-of-law reviews on all EU states, but Poland is "optimistic" that Ursula von er Leyen will let it off the hook.

EU proposes yearly rule of law 'reports'

EU states ought to undergo a yearly "Rule of Law Review Cycle" to help stop countries such as Hungary, Poland, and Romania from backsliding on EU norms, the European Commission has said.

While Poles defend courts, Kaczynski hijacks EU elections

While Twitter and EU bubble publications are flooded with photos of protesting crowds and "chains of light" in front of the presidential palace, the Law and Justice-controlled senate has adopted a law restructuring the electoral code for 2019's European elections.

Commission takes Poland to court on eve of election

As Poland's combative Law and Justice party faces elections this Sunday, the commission once again sends a case on its domestic judiciary reforms to the European Court of Justice for breaking EU rules.

Polish election: analysing why PiS won

Support for democracy was particularly low in Poland with only 19 percent consistently supporting democracy - only Hungary and Bulgaria scored lower.

Column

Only democracy can fight epidemics

As Li Wenliang, the deceased Chinese doctor who was reprimanded for reporting on the virus, said: "There should be more openness and transparency".

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking Europe’s Economy Circular – the time is now
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersScottish parliament seeks closer collaboration with the Nordic Council
  3. UNESDAFrom Linear to Circular – check out UNESDA's new blog
  4. Nordic Council of Ministers40 years of experience have proven its point: Sustainable financing actually works
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ministers paving the way for 5G in the region
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms

Latest News

  1. Court: Three countries broke EU law on migrant relocation
  2. Journalism hit hard by corona crisis
  3. EU fighting shortages and faulty medical supplies
  4. New EU navy operation to keep migrant details secret
  5. MEP: Constituents are our window into this tragedy
  6. Without European patriotism, EU decline is inevitable
  7. EU cancels April Fool's 'fake news'
  8. A coronavirus 'Marshall Plan' alone won't be nearly enough

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us