Tuesday

26th May 2020

Opinion

An EU migration policy revolution from the courts?

  • The great novelty of the new 2020 ECHR ruling is that the applicants had not used official entry procedures and, because of their own conduct, Spanish police were justified in returning them to Morocco without examining their personal circumstances (Photo: EUobserver)

When it comes to policies on irregular migration, it is sometimes courts, not parliaments, that call the shots.

A ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) last month proved the point.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. 'The principle of non-refoulement has not been designed to facilitate smuggler-organised breaches of national borders. Yet that is how the Strasbourg court has often interpreted it' (Photo: paulbavo)

The court ruled that the Spanish government did not violate the principle of non-refoulment (prohibition of collective expulsions) contained in Protocol 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The ruling represents a welcome change in the judgements of the ECHR, allowing a European government to exercise a degree of control over its borders.

The two applicants in the case were nationals of Mali and Ivory Coast respectively.

In 2014, the two attempted to break into Spain, as part of a large group, by overcoming the border fences between Morocco and the Spanish territory of Melilla.

After climbing to the top of the border fence, "N.T." and "N.D." climbed down with the help of the Spanish police and were taken back to Morocco. (Later in the same year, both applicants managed to illegally enter Spain. One's asylum application was rejected and the other never applied for asylum.)

When the ECHR heard the case in 2017, it ruled in favour of the applicants and awarded them damages.

Now, in February 2020, the Grand Chamber of the same court overturned that decision on appeal from the Spanish government.

The great novelty of the 2020 ruling is in that, according to the court, the applicants had not used official entry procedures and that, because of their own conduct, Guardia Civil was justified to return them to the Moroccan police without examining their personal circumstances.

Implications for EU border control

The long-term implications for European border policies are less clear than some commentaries suggest.

First, the court's reasoning was based on the recognition that the applicants were safe and legally present in Morocco. They were not justified in illegally entering Spain. We do not know how the court would have ruled if their individual circumstances were different.

Second, the ruling covered the prevention of entry at Spain's land borders. Situations at sea are different in that international maritime law applies there.

Third, the ruling was predicated on the fact that in this specific case, the breach of the Spanish border occurred en masse. It is not clear how an individual breach would have been assessed by the court.

Things will become somewhat clearer when the Spanish Constitutional Court rules on the relevant national legislation in light of the present ruling.

Because of the specificity of the present case, this judgement does not bring Europe closer towards Australia's policy of zero tolerance towards irregular border crossings.

Australia applies a different, much more restrictive interpretation of non-refoulement. The sense of control thus generated results in sustained support for the country's open policy for legal migration.

EU's policy on irregular migration

The principle of non-refoulement was developed in the wake of World War Two to prevent a repetition of forcible returns of hundreds of thousands of Jews and Soviet citizens to their countries of origin.

The principle was codified in the Refugee Convention of 1951, the European Convention on Human Rights and other international treaties.

The principle of non-refoulement has not been designed to facilitate smuggler-organised breaches of national borders. Yet that is how the Strasbourg court has interpreted the applicable international treaties.

Even the final ruling on "N.T." and "N.D." v. Spain does not fundamentally change the prevailing interpretation. A vast body of over-generous rulings by the ECHR remains in place.

During the hearing, human rights organisations argued that the applicants were discriminated against by the Moroccan authorities which did not allow them to apply for asylum in Spain.

Going beyond the specifics of the present case, the possibility of applying for asylum from abroad needs to be looked at.

To remain credible, European migration policies ought to combine vigilant border policing with asylum procedures through managed resettlement of asylum seekers from third countries to the EU.

Under the existing lavish interpretations of non-refoulement at the EU border, substantive European commitment to resettlement will never be formed. Who would welcome the stranger through the front gate when the back doors and side windows can't be shut?

Still, it is just possible that the present ruling will open the way to a much-needed judicial pragmatism on policies on irregular migration.

More restrictive court judgements would result in broader support for common migration policies across the EU.

Critics misread the public mood when they claim that migration restrictions are a sign of creeping authoritarianism. In reality, authoritarian leaders are given free reign when the public fears a migration that is out of control. The 2015-16 refugee crisis is a case in point.

Opinion polls have been consistently showing the European public's dissatisfaction with the bloc's handling of irregular migration. Migration policies designed without public support will only continue contributing towards the current malaise of the West.

Author bio

Vít Novotný is a senior researcher officer at the Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, the official think tank of the European People's Party.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

What you don't hear about Spain's migration policy

Morocco is a far cry from Libya. But Spain's cooperation on migration with Morocco still warrants closer scrutiny. The argument that Morocco is a safe country and a reliable recipient of EU funding is becoming harder to uphold.

EU not prepared for 2015 repeat, warns migration chief

The Vienna-based International Centre for Migration Policy Development is predicting possible migration flashpoints in Iran, Libya and South America over the next 12 months. Its director-general Michael Spindelegger says EU states are not prepared for a repeat of 2015.

New EU migration pact must dust off fundamental rights

The EU's new Pact on Migration and Asylum is an opportunity to take a different approach. To take a breath, to remember the values that the European project was founded upon, and to dust off the good old fundamental rights.

How coronavirus might hit EU defence spending

Among the casualties of coronavirus - worldwide and in the EU - is the defence sector. However, the Covid-19 pandemic has not made the world a less dangerous place and there is no alternative to having a functioning defence system.

Column

That German court ruling hurts EU rule-of-law fightback

The short-term damage to financial markets may be smaller than feared. The damage to democracy is considerable because it weakened the ECJ - the most effective institution to stop attacks against democracy and rule of law in EU member states.

Column

Saving Europe from corona's nasty geopolitics

Four months into the corona crisis and one month into the social and economic shutdown, it seems the big geopolitical loser of the pandemic is likely going to be Europe.

Coronavirus: A test of the West

We are experiencing the first global pandemic unfolding in the 24/7 news cycle and taking its toll, in real time, on our daily lives, our financial security and the global economy.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. European Sustainable Energy WeekThis year’s EU Sustainable Energy Week (EUSEW) will be held digitally!
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic states are fighting to protect gender equality during corona crisis
  3. UNESDACircularity works, let’s all give it a chance
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers call for post-corona synergies between economic recovery and green transition
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic co-operation on COVID-19
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic research collaboration on pandemics

Latest News

  1. Recovery plans unveiled This WEEK
  2. EU and UK stumbling into Irish border crisis
  3. Malta patrol boat 'intimidates' capsized migrants
  4. How coronavirus might hit EU defence spending
  5. Herman Van Rompuy on power and influence in the EU
  6. EU links access to recovery fund to economic advice
  7. EU wants to halve use of pesticides by 2030
  8. Top editors alarmed by media cuts in EU and beyond

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking Europe’s Economy Circular – the time is now
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersScottish parliament seeks closer collaboration with the Nordic Council
  3. UNESDAFrom Linear to Circular – check out UNESDA's new blog
  4. Nordic Council of Ministers40 years of experience have proven its point: Sustainable financing actually works
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ministers paving the way for 5G in the region
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us