5th Feb 2023


What does coronavirus 'Black Swan' mean for markets?

  • The smartest people on Wall Street and beyond are struggling to figure out whether the epidemic will lead to shocks in the short term, or whether it is a longer threat that will radically change the lives of millions of people around the world (Photo: Ahmad Nawawi)

Global stock markets are in a fever. The growing public health crisis around the globe has distressed financial systems and raised concerns that the economy is moving towards a sharp slowdown.

The Black Swan of the coronavirus infection epidemic launched a chain of events in the markets, one of the links of which was a dramatic drop in oil prices.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

These events will have a long-term impact on the global economy, requiring substantial adjustment of investment strategies, while not forgetting about short-term speculations on the market rebound.

Quotes are falling. Economies are getting exposed. And at a pace that can make the global financial markets dizzy. There are no exceptions - the rapid exchange rally, which was mainly caused by liquidity, has long been on a fragile foundation.

The massive dumping of shares, comparable only to the collapse of the financial market in 2008, provoked a frantic race for those assets that were considered reliable during times of crisis, including government bonds and gold.

Yields on US Treasury bonds, considered the most reliable of the reliable, fell to a record low.

The magnitude of the panic and the potentially widespread global economic damage caused a reaction from central bankers, beginning with Bank of England head Mark Carney and US Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell, who took an unusual step by issuing a statement designed to reassure Americans.

Analysts, trying to assess the consequences of what is happening in their economic forecasts, cannot explain how all this will affect individual economies or where markets can calm down.

The coronavirus swan turned out to be so black for financial markets that even inveterate optimists among brokerage company analysts turned off their "Buy on dips!"


The record demonstrates how difficult it is for global stock markets and business to remain solvent, adequately capitalised going-concern once a crisis of confidence strikes.

With capital markets now frozen to in disarray, and the global economy seemingly headed for a protracted downturn, many companies that relied on the continuance of these conditions may be forced into financial distress or bankruptcy.

The smartest people on Wall Street and beyond are struggling to figure out whether the epidemic will lead to shocks in the short term, or whether it is a longer threat that will radically change the lives of millions of people around the world.

We might expect a recession in Europe and southeast Asia (expert consensus from -0.1 percent for Japan [UBS], to -1 percent for Korea, Nomura, and Japan [JPMorgan], zero growth in China (year-on-year spread from + 2.5 percent Goldman Sachs to zero Nomura and Bank of Montreal) and minimal growth in the USA (range of estimates from -0.2 percent Moody's to + 0.8 percent JPMorgan).

The failure in the economies will not end with a V-shaped U-turn, as with SARS, and we should rather wait for a U-shaped exit from the crisis, and in China, recovery will go faster due to a more aggressive reaction of the authorities "the old fashioned way": through infrastructure costs, lower rates , assistance to regions and affected sectors (air carriers are already nationalised).

Core inflation might jump shortly on problems with trade chains, but falling demand and prices for oil and other raw materials will revive the risk of deflation at the level of general inflation.

Central banks, of course, will prefer to respond to the lowest of inflation indicators and appeal to the fall of the inflation premium imputed in bonds.

The inevitable collapse in international trade and the long-term rethinking of China's role as the only major hub for the production of consumer goods and electronics are inevitable.

A collapse in the commodity markets might be expected, multiplied by the de facto collapse of OPEC + and a return to the policy of "extracting and selling everything we want."

But stimulus measures from China and the collapse of shale oil in the United States might lead to a sharp compensating rally in the summer and autumn.

Many resource-dependent countries (Australia, Brazil, South Africa, Chile and, possibly, Russia) can also slip into a technical recession and currency crisis.

Aggressive and fairly coordinated measures of state assistance to economies and markets might help return the global economy to moderate growth, but the "cartridges" spent by central banks to fight the virus will be sorely missed when a wave of corporate defaults sweeps markets - this might happen with a lag of several quarters and even after economic recovery.

Author bio

Elina Morhunova is a European and international business lawyer, and assistant to Lithuanian Renew MEP Petras Austreivicius.


The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Markets plunge after ECB and EU fail to convince

US president Donald Trump hit the EU economy with an unexpected travel ban, while markets went into a freefall after disappointment with the European Central Bank's measures to offset the coronavirus fallout.

How reliable is WHO coronavirus data?

The numbers that the World Health Organisation publishes, the numbers that journalists and governments around the world refer to, are contaminated with politics. They are not useless, they tell us something, but they paint a skewed picture. How so?

Europe is giving more aid to Ukraine than you think

'Europeans need to pull their weight in Ukraine. They should pony up more funds.' Such has been the chorus since the start of the war. The problem is the argument isn't borne out by the facts, at least not anymore.

Latest News

  1. Greece faces possible court over 'prison-like' EU-funded migration centres
  2. How the centre-right can take on hard-right and win big in 2024
  3. Top EU officials show Ukraine solidarity on risky trip
  4. MEPs launch anonymous drop-box for shady lobbying secrets
  5. Hawkish ECB rate-rise 'puts energy transition at risk'
  6. MEPs push for greater powers for workers' councils
  7. How Pavel won big as new Czech president — and why it matters
  8. French official to take on Islamophobia in EU

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Party of the European LeftJOB ALERT - Seeking a Communications Manager (FT) for our Brussels office!
  2. European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual & Reproductive Rights (EPF)Launch of the EPF Contraception Policy Atlas Europe 2023. 8th February. Register now.
  3. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains
  4. Forum EuropeConnecting the World from the Skies calls for global cooperation in NTN rollout
  5. EFBWWCouncil issues disappointing position ignoring the threats posed by asbestos
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersLarge Nordic youth delegation at COP15 biodiversity summit in Montreal

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP27: Food systems transformation for climate action
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersThe Nordic Region and the African Union urge the COP27 to talk about gender equality
  3. Friedrich Naumann Foundation European DialogueGender x Geopolitics: Shaping an Inclusive Foreign Security Policy for Europe
  4. Obama FoundationThe Obama Foundation Opens Applications for its Leaders Program in Europe
  5. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  6. European Committee of the RegionsRe-Watch EURegions Week 2022

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us