Thursday

5th Aug 2021

Opinion

Why EU must limit political micro-targeting

  • In contrast to campaign posters on the street or ads on TV, other voters have no way of knowing what paid political messaging their fellow citizens are seeing (Photo: Eduardo Woo)

It has become a standard feature of political campaigning in the EU to use ads on social media to reach voters and supporters.

In Germany, political parties spent nearly €3m on Facebook ads in 2019 and expenditures in the UK and other countries are even higher.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • Facebook offers a tool to review what ad interests users have and Google allows only basic demographic data to target political ads (Photo: Matt Tempest)

The advertising machines of social networks, video portals and search engines make it relatively easy and cheap to reach masses of voters quickly.

While this has helped increase the scale of voter outreach, the unprecedented masses of ads make public-interest scrutiny hard for journalists, researchers and regulators.

Political advertisers can also use the platforms' algorithmic ad delivery to find specific audiences and hammer home certain political messages over and over again.

This micro-targeting helps campaigns reach voters but, again, comes with risks: there is a danger of paying to amplify existing polarised debates and voter segmentation. These risks need to be urgently addressed by putting in place safeguards for micro-targeting.

Limiting micro-targeting is not a new idea, but is gaining traction in the EU, as it is part of the deliberations surrounding the European Democracy Action Plan (EDAP).

The EDAP deals with questions of media pluralism and political advertising, and one key component could be limiting micro-targeting for political ads.

'Micro' does not mean tiny

Micro-targeting is not necessarily equivalent to targeting tiny audiences, it means targeting specific, homogeneous audiences.

This is possible on social media due to the vast amounts of personal behavioural data that platforms have on users. Such personal data is used to infer people's preferences, dislikes and fears, and to group them into advertising profiles.

Advertisers can then opt to have platform algorithms deliver ads to those people most likely to engage with their political messages.

It remains hard for researchers to study micro-targeting and its effects, in part due to a lack of access to companies' data.

Nonetheless, campaigns in the US and across the EU as well as other parts of the world have shown how targeting might skew political debates and agendas: if a campaign can figure out exactly what certain groups of voters want to hear, they can pay to repeatedly send that message to them.

In contrast to campaign posters on the street or ads on TV, other voters have no way of knowing what paid political messaging their fellow citizens are seeing. People become siphoned off from each other and societal divides might harden.

To be clear, limiting micro-targeted advertising is not a panacea for all ills afflicting online political campaigning. A whole range of measures is necessary to address shady ad practices – starting with improved access for independent researchers and mandatory transparency measures for platforms and advertisers.

Yet, finding ways to put a brake on micro-targeting has several advantages: it could reduce the amount of personal data that is used for paid political messaging, because platforms would have less incentives to collect personal data in the first place.

It could allow counter-speech and more public-interest scrutiny, because ads would have to be targeted to larger, more heterogeneous groups. And ultimately, the hope is that this could lower the risk of political ads further polarising the electorate.

There are different options to limit micro-targeting that should be discussed during the development of the EDAP as well as the upcoming Digital Services Act (DSA), which deals with platform transparency and accountability.

Civil society experts and academics have already put forth ideas and some of the European Parliament's committee draft reports on the DSA make specific proposals as well.

It seems promising to put limits into place as to what and how much data can be used for creating users' ad profiles. That way, it is harder to target homogenous groups.

It could be debated whether a minimum size for political target audiences could be implemented, which would further enhance options for counter-speech.

There could also be an opt-in for users to receive targeted advertising. Expanded disclosures of ad targeting and delivery criteria would benefit users and allow better public-interest scrutiny.

Platforms already do some of these things: for example, Facebook offers a tool to review what ad interests users have and Google allows only basic demographic data to target political ads.

Such laudable voluntarily efforts should be improved upon, made mandatory and implemented industry-wide.

The EU should now seize the opportunity to tackle risks associated with paid political messaging online and take the lead on this to set a standard for globally operating ad delivery platforms.

Author bio

Julian Jaursch is a project director working on disinformation and platform regulation topics at Stiftung Neue Verantwortung (SNV), a Berlin-based not-for-profit, non-partisan tech policy think tank.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Column

Four tweets broke Facebook - good news for EU regulators

Facebook PR chief Nick Clegg tried to make us believe that it is comparable to a phone company. Nothing could be further from the truth. His company decides which messages users see. It literally "ranks" content.

Facebook to retroactively alert users of bogus content

US social media giant Facebook announced new measures to tackle the 'infodemic' triggered by bogus content on the coronavirus. The move coincides with a study by activists showing how Facebook had so far failed to curtail virus-related disinformation.

Only EU can tame Zuckerberg's Facebook

When the EU speaks, Silicon Valley listens. The tech titans know that the EU matters. Which is why it's so crucial that following the lobbying from Zuckerberg, on disinformation, the EU gets regulation right.

EU warns tech giants 'time to go beyond self-reguation'

The European Commission has concluded that code of practice to fight disinformation fails to guarantee enough transparency and accountability from tech platforms like Facebook, Google, and Twitter - saying it is time to go beyond this self-regulatory mechanism.

Cyprus' Varosha is Erdogan's canary in the coalmine

Last month, president Ersin Tatar of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, unrecognised outside of Turkey, announced the second phase of reopening the derelict tourist district of Varosha in the city of Famagusta.

Column

Burkinis and 'soul caps' - policing Olympic women back in fashion

There are no fixed rules. Anyone can criticise, condone and codify women's apparel. The game is inclusive, bringing together an assorted collection of voyeurs, misogynists, racists, bigots, religious fanatics and culture warriors – but also feminists and other equality campaigners.

News in Brief

  1. EU secures deal with Novavax for potential Covid-19 vaccine
  2. France fined €10m for failing to tackle air pollution
  3. Fire near Athens forces thousands to evacuate
  4. EU to Lebanon: 'deliver results' on Beirut blast probe
  5. Belarus opposition leader demands regime end
  6. Croatia's border-monitoring of migrant rights 'falls short'
  7. Court stops Austria's Afghan deportation, as conflict worsens
  8. 'Missing' Belarus exiles group chief found dead in Kyiv

Column

Burkinis and 'soul caps' - policing Olympic women back in fashion

There are no fixed rules. Anyone can criticise, condone and codify women's apparel. The game is inclusive, bringing together an assorted collection of voyeurs, misogynists, racists, bigots, religious fanatics and culture warriors – but also feminists and other equality campaigners.

Hungary: why we can't support a global minimum tax

This month the OECD Inclusive Framework agreed on the main building blocks of new tax legislation for a global minimum tax and for the digital economy. However, Hungary did not join - this is why.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNineteen demands by Nordic young people to save biodiversity
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersSustainable public procurement is an effective way to achieve global goals
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council enters into formal relations with European Parliament
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersWomen more active in violent extremist circles than first assumed
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersDigitalisation can help us pick up the green pace
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCOVID19 is a wake-up call in the fight against antibiotic resistance

Latest News

  1. Italy seeks EU help on migrant boat arrivals
  2. WHO calls for vaccine-booster pause to help poor countries
  3. Romania selling on its jabs, despite low vaccination rates
  4. Cyprus' Varosha is Erdogan's canary in the coalmine
  5. Europe sees drop in Covid-19 cases
  6. Burkinis and 'soul caps' - policing Olympic women back in fashion
  7. Telegram groups lure migrant hopefuls to Lithuania
  8. Third-time lucky for one Syrian grandmother in Denmark

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us