11th Aug 2022


'Future EU' conference: good idea, bad timing

  • Even in normal times, it would have been challenging to reach and engage with citizens - let alone during a global pandemic (Photo:

Let's put aside the choice of the unattractive name of the upcoming EU-wide initiative: "Conference for the Future of Europe".

Let's also put aside its many presidents (three honorary presidents and three executive presidents, after abandoning the idea of a single "eminent European personality" to act as the conference's chair), and the drastic shortening of its duration (from two years to less than one) - which is difficult to explain with any other arguments but serving the pre-election campaign of the French president Emmanuel Macron, so that he can claim his idea to hold such a forum was accomplished.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

What I wish to question is its timing - or, rather, why it is not the time to launch it now.

The widely-announced results of the most recent survey, commissioned by the European Parliament and European Commission, sound a bit unreal.

According to this poll, 92 percent of citizens across all member states demand that their voices are "taken more into account in decisions relating to the future of Europe" and three-quarters of Europeans consider that the upcoming Conference on the Future of Europe will have a positive impact on democracy within the EU.

It is doubtful that so many Europeans beyond the Brussels' Bubble, and beyond the media, academic and think-thank circles (especially at this particular pandemic time), are preoccupied with the deficiencies in the EU governance or are eager to "rediscover the soul of the European project", as parliament president David Sassoli invited them to do in his speech.

During her launch speech, EU Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, stated that the aim is to reach the "silent majority" - and this is exactly what should be done, but not via a high-level conference in locked-down regions, cities and villages.

Unfortunately, citizens, at large, are ignorant about the EU and certainly about the Conference on the Future of Europe for a number of reasons: among the main of which, is their existing knowledge deficit about the EU construction and decision-making processes.

Even in normal times, it would have been challenging to reach and engage with them, let alone now, when so many people from all walks of life have lost a beloved person to Covid, or have lost jobs and incomes, or parents have been left at home with their online-schooled kids, and so many young people's mental health has deteriorated due to social restrictions, curfews, closed universities, sports clubs, cinemas, etc.

Right now, this "silent majority" the EU institutions are targeting, is struggling to adapt to the "new normal" the pandemic brought about.


"We want to hear about the Europe our citizens are dreaming of," said von der Leyen, just before signing the joint declaration.

Even Europeans who have previously been ready to devote time and energy to contribute to the debate on EU's future, now with the Covid-19 pandemic making them struggle to meet basic needs - of a physiological and safety nature. They have no time left to formulate their dreams about the EU polity and policies and/or take part in any form of civil society activism.

What is more, attentive listening to European citizens should be a permanent and continuous process - and not merely limited to one event which starts on 9 May 2021 and is to finish before the presidential elections in France in the spring of 2022.

And in fact this whole endeavour is not unique and without precedent, as many top EU politicians try to present it.

Attempts at intense dialogue with citizens have been made, both top-down and bottom-up, with varying degrees of success, for several decades already, and there is nothing unprecedented and revolutionary.

It should be enough merely to mention the Convention on the Future of Europe, the Debating Europe initiative, the Citizens Dialogues, etc etc.

So this was not the right moment to get started on the Conference on the Future of Europe. It could - and should - have been left for less turbulent times, when everyone was vaccinated, our freedoms restored, and travel bans lifted so that those willing to take part can do it live, and not on Zoom or some other online mechanism.

But for good or bad, this initiative will take place.

If everybody from the pro-EU camp wishes to see it succeed and not turned into another 'pseudo-event' with heavy EU propaganda and self-glorification, it is now the time to contribute and make the most of it.

Let's start, for example, with elaborating a persuasive communication strategy for all its phases - with the aim to stimulate vibrant public interest around EU affairs.


The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

12-month Future EU Conference is 'impossible', expert warns

The debate about the much-delayed Conference on the Future of Europe so far has been locked in endless institutional infighting over who should lead the event - lowering the expectations about what can be achieved in the coming months.

Future of Europe: Nearly half of citizens want reforms

European Parliament president David Sassoli called for the Conference on the Future of Europe "to start as soon as possible". Meanwhile, nearly half of EU citizens would like to see reforms to the bloc.

Why a shortened 'Future Europe' conference suits France

Convening citizens' panels and conducting multi-level debates on various policy topics in the timespan of one year, and under social-distancing restrictions, will be either impossible, or will boil the Conference on the Future of Europe down to a mere window-dressing.

Dozen EU states spell out 'Future of Europe' priorities

A group of 12 member states have set out the priorities of the long-awaited Conference on the Future of Europe - but argue that reform of existing legislative processes, and institutional power balances, should be off the table.

Just cancel the Future of Europe Conference

After spending an estimated €200m and countless months in meetings, the conference will likely release a grand statement along the lines of 'making the EU more inclusive, more competitive, sustainable, green',


Global hunger crisis requires more than just the Odessa deal

International donors are playing hide and seek. Instead of stepping up their assistance programmes, richer nations are cutting overseas aid, or reallocating funds from other parts of the world towards the Ukraine crisis.

Exploiting the Ukraine crisis for Big Business

From food policy to climate change, corporate lobbyists are exploiting the Ukraine crisis to try to slash legislation that gets in the way of profit. But this is only making things worse.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  3. European Centre for Press and Media FreedomEuropean Anti-SLAPP Conference 2022
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  6. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us