Sunday

2nd Oct 2022

Opinion

Swiss vote to ban burqas increases risk of extremism

  • The Swiss ban follows similar restrictions on public veiling in Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, France, and the Netherlands, all of which have in place full or partial restrictions on the veil (Photo: miss_ohara)

By a slim margin, citizens of Switzerland voted earlier this month (7 March) to prohibit Muslim women from wearing Islamic face coverings such as the niqab and burqa in public.

The Swiss ban follows similar restrictions on public veiling in Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, France, and the Netherlands, all of which have in place full or partial restrictions on the veil.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

While laws against face coverings in these countries do not mention Islam or Islamic headgear by name in order to avoid violating anti-discrimination provisions, they are widely believed to be targeted at Muslims and, accordingly, are often referred to by their supporters as "burqa bans."

Proponents of banning or restricting the wearing of Islamic face coverings believe that the veil represents a lack of proper Muslim assimilation into mainstream European society and dehumanises women, which, in turn, creates populations vulnerable to radicalisation.

The veil is also seen a powerful symbolic threat associated with terrorism.

Those who wear it are perceived as siding with extremist Islam instead of the secular West and seek to promote a radical political ideology of Islamism throughout the continent.

Indeed, this was the underlying logic of the Swiss ban.

As stated by Walter Wobmann, chairman of the referendum committee, the Islamic face covering represents a "symbol for this extreme, political Islam which has become increasingly prominent in Europe and which has no place in Switzerland."

The proposal to ban the veil in public was initiated by the rightwing Swiss People's Party, which had campaigned with slogans such as "Stop Radical Islam!" and "Stop Extremism!"

Will the Swiss burqa ban achieve its intended goal of combatting extremism?

Law of unintended consequences

My research suggests that such a ban will have the opposite effect of increasing the risk of extremism and terrorism, as it has in other countries where Islamic face coverings have been banned.

In a study on the relationship between burqa bans and terrorism in Europe, my co-author and I find that such restrictions on the wearing of the veil is strongly and positively correlated with Islamist terrorism, even when controlling for a number of other political, demographic, and economic factors that might be related to terrorism.

Jarringly, we find that countries with veil restrictions experience almost 15 times more cases of Islamist terrorist attacks and 17 times more terrorism-related fatalities than countries not having these bans.

Our numerous statistical tests also find that these attacks follow rather than precede restrictions on the veil.

Contrary to the prevailing wisdom, veil restrictions encourage terrorism.

Why would this be the case? One explanation is that restrictions on the veil represent an important violation of religious freedom. These restrictions naturally breed resentment among stigmatised and marginalised groups.

Numerous studies over the past decade document a powerful symbiotic relationship between religious repression from above and religious extremism from below.

A number of terrorists have claimed restrictions on Islamic dress to be one of the key factors leading them down the path of violent extremism.

Prohibitions of religious practice, such as veil bans, are interpreted as an attack on their culture and values, breeding resentment and in some cases leading to violence.

Another explanation is that veil restrictions undercut women's rights. Restrictions on female religious garb inevitably result in the seclusion and isolation of Muslim women from the rest of society - the very thing that burqa bans are supposed to ameliorate.

Such a reality may also result in Muslim women, who are normally barriers to the radicalisation process, becoming more accepting of the idea that violence is an appropriate means to change the status quo.

Indeed, research also reveals an important causal relationship between the restriction of women's rights and violent conflict.

All this suggests that the Swiss vote will likely lead to unintended consequences and set into motion a spiral of repression and resistance, as it has in other countries.

The security implications of burqa bans - to say nothing of the human rights consequences - urgently call on Switzerland along with minded countries to rethink their policies of exclusion and to recognise the necessity of cultural sensitivity towards religious minorities as the bedrock of national security.

The good news is that the nature of direct democracy in Switzerland allows for the citizens of the country to reverse course on this issue, especially given the close vote on the proposal.

Author bio

Nilay Saiya is assistant professor of public policy and global affairs at Nanyang Technological University and a senior fellow with the Religious Freedom Institute. He is author of the book Weapon of Peace: How Religious Liberty Combats Terrorism (Cambridge University Press, 2018).

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

France shuts oldest reactor amid Macron climate pledges

France's oldest nuclear power plant finally closed on Tuesday, one day after president Emmanuel Macron pledged to speed up the country's transition to a greener economy responding to the proposals from the French citizens' convention on climate.

Column

Meghan Markle, royal racism and the 'European Way of Life'

For years, the EU's "united in diversity" motto has allowed policymakers to claim that conversations on race, religion, colour and ethnicity are foreign to European culture. But a colour-blind Europe is a fairy tale.

How US tech giants play EU states off against each other

Some have tried to justify Big Tech's meagre tax payments in EU states with heavier tax burdens by emphasising the fact that these companies create jobs and invest in next-generation technologies. However, their market dominance comes at a steep cost.

Can King Charles III reset the broken Brexit relationship?

The Queen's funeral was an impressive demonstration of solidarity from the EU towards a country that left the Union in 2020, and with whom the EU's relations have never recovered. Can the new King Charles III build bridges to Brussels?

Column

EU should admonish less, and listen more, to the Global South

Whether on Russia, or gas, or climate change, or food security, the EU's constant finger-wagging and moralising is becoming unbearably repetitive and self-defeating. Most countries in the Global South view it as eurocentric and neo-colonial.

News in Brief

  1. EU ministers adopt measures to tackle soaring energy bills
  2. EU takes Malta to court over golden passports
  3. EU to ban Russian products worth €7bn a year more
  4. Denmark: CIA did not warn of Nord Stream attack
  5. Drone sightings in the North Sea 'occurred over months'
  6. Gazprom threatens to cut gas deliveries to Europe via Ukraine
  7. New compromise over EU energy emergency measures
  8. 15 states push for EU-wide gas price cap

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. The European Association for Storage of EnergyRegister for the Energy Storage Global Conference, held in Brussels on 11-13 Oct.
  2. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBA lot more needs to be done to better protect construction workers from asbestos
  3. European Committee of the RegionsThe 20th edition of EURegionsWeek is ready to take off. Save your spot in Brussels.
  4. UNESDA - Soft Drinks EuropeCall for EU action – SMEs in the beverage industry call for fairer access to recycled material
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic prime ministers: “We will deepen co-operation on defence”
  6. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries

Latest News

  1. Editor's weekly digest: A week of leaks
  2. Putin declares holy war on Western 'satanism'
  3. Two elections and 'Macron's club' in focus Next WEEK
  4. EU agrees windfall energy firm tax — but split on gas-price cap
  5. Ukrainian chess prodigy: 'We are not going to resign ... anywhere'
  6. Going Down Under — EU needs to finish trade deal with Australia
  7. MEPs worry Russian disinfo weakens support for Ukraine
  8. Everything you need to know about the EU gas price cap plan

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us