26th Jul 2021


Why is EU set to ban 'creamy' and 'alternative to yoghurt'?

  • If the amendment is implemented, plant-based foods would be forbidden from 'evoking' dairy products in any way, including useful descriptive terms such as 'creamy' and 'alternative to dairy' (Photo: Gaston Bruno)

On Thursday (29 April) the EU will decide on a controversial amendment that would severely restrict the marketing of plant-based-dairy products.

While the outcome is still uncertain, it's already clear that this is about more than just oat milk: the credibility of the EU and its green food ambitions are at stake.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

In its 2020 Farm to Fork strategy, the European Commission urgently called for an accelerated transition to a sustainable food system.

And with good reason: a study published in Science magazine showed that even if all fossil fuel emissions were eliminated immediately, emissions from the global food system alone would make it impossible to limit global warming to 1.5C – and difficult to even stay below the 2C target.

One might think that, given this urgency, large-scale reforms would be under way for the agricultural sector.

But last October's Common Agricultural Policy vote shattered such illusions, with the European Parliament overwhelmingly voting in favour of business-as-usual, directing billions in EU taxpayers' money to unsustainable and damaging farming practices. The vote was seen by civil society as a severe blow to the commission's green ambitions.

A key element of the Farm to Fork strategy is the shift towards more plant-based diets.

The bulk of the EU food system's harmful impact on the environment is caused by the production of meat and dairy. The very least one might expect from the EU would be to not actively stimulate their consumption, but this is exactly what it does through its promotional subsidies which run to millions of euros a year.

The commission proposed to halt these subsidies in the original draft of the Farm to Fork strategy, but retracted them mere days before publication.

It seems that the EU´s nascent plant-based ambitions have been effectively quelled by the animal-agriculture lobby.

And now, this week's trilogue could constitute a lethal blow to the already-damaged credibility of the EU's food ambitions. Amendment 171 would actively hamper the consumption of plant-based alternatives by introducing a raft of new restrictions to plant-based dairy alternatives.

No 'evoking' dairy products

If the amendment is implemented, plant-based foods would be forbidden from 'evoking' dairy products in any way.

This could mean they could not be sold in familiar packaging such as cartons and that useful descriptive terms such as 'creamy' and 'alternative to yoghurt' would be prohibited.

Visual depictions of plant-based foods would also be forbidden if they were seen as resembling dairy – for example, a milky swirl on a package of oat milk.

Even essential allergen information such as "does not contain milk" could be construed as 'evoking' dairy. While the rationale is allegedly 'consumer protection', the amendment clearly has the dairy industry's fingerprints all over it.

It's little wonder, then, that the amendment was met with fierce resistance from the plant-based-food sector.

But what should give decision-makers even more pause is that both BEUC and CECU, two European consumer-protection authorities, condemned the amendment as having no justification whatsoever and in fact being counter to the interests of consumers.

The draconian amendment has been widely condemned by an extensive and diverse group of stakeholders, including 21 NGOs, a cross-sector group of 94 food companies, 90 percent of the Dutch parliament, and almost half a million citizens who signed a petition.

Even some representatives from the dairy sector have opposed the amendment, including the organisation 'Caring Farmers' and Berglandmilch, the largest Austrian dairy co-operative.

This leads to the question of who or what exactly this amendment is for.

Neither the European Parliament nor the commission have provided any clear justification for the argument that consumers need to be protected from plant-based-dairy terms. Who are these consumers that are misled by plant-based packaging? The supposed victims of accidental almond milk purchase have certainly never filed any complaints or launched a petition, let alone one signed by hundreds of thousands of people.

In a response to an NGO letter, the EU commission cited the history of the protection of dairy terms, which "has been part of the EU legal framework for the marketing of milk and milk products for more than 30 years". But what remains unclear is what exactly dairy products should be protected against, why they would require stronger protection than any other food group, and why these already-strong protections would need further strengthening now.

The commission even has the audacity to cite "fair competition and avoidance of market distortion", when it is clear the amendment does the opposite: it unfairly discriminates against sustainable alternatives to dairy.

This week, the EU will decide. Will it endorse an anti-competitive, environmentally reckless policy that serves no interest or purpose other than that of the polluting dairy industry? If so, it would be the last nail in the coffin of the Farm to Fork strategy. Who could take the EU's ambitions for sustainable diets seriously after that?

Author bio

Jasmijn de Boo is vice president of ProVeg International, an international non-profit organisation working to transform the world food system by replacing animal products with plant and cellular alternatives.


The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

EU spent €252m on meat and dairy ads, despite green pledges

The European Commission has spent €252m of its farming advertising budget for 2016-2020 to promote meat and dairy products - raising concerns over the compatibility of EU agri-food promotion policy with the bloc's climate ambitions.

NGOs urge EU to tackle meat consumption 'problem'

"Food and agriculture are at the heart of the ecological crisis. This is one area where doing right by the planet means doing right by people in the most obvious way," said head of policy at NGO BirdLife, Ariel Brunner.


EU should clarify rules for plant burgers and lab meat

Chatham House research fellow Laura Wellesley discusses her new report, which looked at how alternative meat products are regulated. 'It's not about everybody becoming vegan,' she said.

Hungary: why we can't support a global minimum tax

This month the OECD Inclusive Framework agreed on the main building blocks of new tax legislation for a global minimum tax and for the digital economy. However, Hungary did not join - this is why.

Why aren't EU's CSDP missions working?

The EU deploys thousands of advisers to its missions abroad. Without addressing reform as a profoundly political struggle, however, the EU will remain successful only in operational advisory and trainings.

News in Brief

  1. Funeral held for Roma man killed in Czech police custody
  2. UN: Afghan civilian casualties at record high
  3. Tunisia's prime minister sacked, parliament suspended
  4. Gaza hit by Israeli airstrikes
  5. Greece annuls humanitarian sea rescue award
  6. Thousands attend Budapest Pride
  7. Macron changes phone after Pegasus spyware revelations
  8. Italy to impose 'vaccinated-only' entry on indoor entertainment

Ukraine - Zelensky's authoritarian turn?

President Volodymyr Zelensky has begun his third year mired in mid-term unpopularity with a poll showing only 21.8 percent of Ukrainians would vote to re-elect him. More than half would prefer him not even to run for a second term.

Why the EU delay on supply chains? Corporate lobbying

EU legislation to clean up supply chains and corporate governance has been delayed after fierce industry lobbying. Voluntary commitments have repeatedly failed, now it is time for decisive regulatory action.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNineteen demands by Nordic young people to save biodiversity
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersSustainable public procurement is an effective way to achieve global goals
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council enters into formal relations with European Parliament
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersWomen more active in violent extremist circles than first assumed
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersDigitalisation can help us pick up the green pace
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersCOVID19 is a wake-up call in the fight against antibiotic resistance

Latest News

  1. Germany mulls restrictions for unvaccinated as cases soar
  2. 'Prison island' birthplace of EU reborn as think-tank venue
  3. Will Erna Solberg be the Nordic Merkel – winning a third term?
  4. Hungary: why we can't support a global minimum tax
  5. Far left and right MEPs less critical of China and Russia
  6. Why is offshore wind the 'Cinderella' of EU climate policy?
  7. Open letter from 30 embassies ahead of Budapest Pride
  8. Orbán counters EU by calling referendum on anti-LGBTI law

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us