28th Oct 2021


Fast fashion vs. climate - how 'repair & resell' is the new model

  • Textiles consumed in the EU generated more than 300 million tonnes of CO2-equivalent in 2017, making it the fifth-largest impact origin of each European and UK citizen (Photo: European Commission)
Listen to article

You have probably all read the latest IPCC report, or at least heard about the findings. What a grim, alarming but realistic picture. Again, we have been reminded of the urgent need to limit global warming to two degrees celsius.

Yet, these ambitions are primarily based on an irrational trust in people's goodwill to act.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

When the last tree was cut down from the Easter Island in the 1600s, sealing the fate of its inhabitants by locking them on the island and precipitating the collapse of their civilisation, surely, somewhere someone was watching this spectacle thinking, "they will realise that it is the last one, we know trees don't grow overnight?"

But the sound of the axe falling on the one lingering tree mirrored the axing their hopes, and resonates now with the tick of the clock running through our heads as time runs out to combat climate change .

Every industry has a part to play in protecting our planet and people - including the apparel and footwear industry. A report of the European Environment Agency found that textiles consumed in the EU generated more than 300 million tonnes of CO2-equivalent in 2017, making it the fifth-largest impact origin of each European and UK citizen.

Hence, to reduce this impact, can we still rely on the goodwill and voluntary steps like the unlucky observer of Easter Island? Clearly no. From citizens, NGOs, to the main players of the textile and apparel industry, the consensus is clear: sustainability has to be turned into legislation - mandatory legislation. I am convinced of this.

The first cut

So, how this can be turned into practice? It is estimated that more than 80 percent of the impact of a clothing item is sealed at the moment of its design.

The initial stage of choosing a material, a cut, or a trim determines the majority of its environmental impact. This phase is the most critical.

And I'm hopeful that we can influence this through legislation.

In some regions, regulation regarding responsible design is already in the pipeline. For instance, in Europe discussions under the Sustainable Policy Initiative (SPI) have kicked off and we expect a full proposal to be published in December.

Just as a product's impact is defined at the design stage, the same is the case for legislation: the SPI has the potential to radically shift the ways products are designed and manufactured, so it is critical that the policies are carefully crafted from the start.

Firstly, as part of the upcoming SPI regulation, every organisation putting products on the market should be required to meet the expectations of the Paris Agreement.

Setting a mandatory threshold in CO2 emission for all industry players, implemented as the industry progressively moves towards better accounting and disclosure of the carbon footprint of each of its products, will pave the way for efficient decarbonisation.

Talking of products, while many leading luxury players continue to maintain their stronghold; every two to three years a new brand enters the market offering ever cheaper and lower quality products.

Fast fashion vs durability

With the drive for a lower price and the emergence of more and more fast fashion brands, durability is inevitably compromised. However, through new regulation, selling durable products shall no longer be a design option - it will be a legal requirement.

As such, each product put on the market will need to meet minimum quality standards, ensuring that our fashion and sport items remain in good condition and last longer. By ensuring the durability of products, consumers will. in turn, be less likely to buy new replacements.

With the longevity of our clothes and shoes ensured, new business models linked to resell and repair can expand even further, offering the opportunity to potentially double again the lifetime of a product.

Not only can design regulation prolong the life of a product, but it can also determine its environmental impact at the end of its use. As items reach their inevitable end-of-life, they need to be fit for a circular economy.

Again, this capability will largely be defined during the design stage by starting to limit certain material types, dies, trim, or chemicals that are incompatible with recycling. Doing so will allow materials to be reintegrated back into the value chain to be reused - not wasted.

Therefore, effective policy has the power to make an impact and we must not rely on voluntary action. I believe legislation can compensate for a lack of goodwill.

If producers and sellers are forced to alter their approach and these key measures are implemented in all garments and footwear products, there will be a responsible baseline for a lasting, resilient and sustainable industry.

Author bio

Baptiste Carriere-Pradal is chair of the Policy Hub – circularity for Apparel and Footwear, which unites the apparel and footwear industry to speak in one voice and propose policies that accelerate circular practices.


The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.


Burkinis and 'soul caps' - policing Olympic women back in fashion

There are no fixed rules. Anyone can criticise, condone and codify women's apparel. The game is inclusive, bringing together an assorted collection of voyeurs, misogynists, racists, bigots, religious fanatics and culture warriors – but also feminists and other equality campaigners.

Why Europe should stop worrying about 'sportswashing'

The UAE's international reputation is steadily being shredded by its own leadership, in moves so blatant that no amount of sporting spin can hide them. Like the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Russia, China will also discover that sportswashing never works.

Why the EU delay on supply chains? Corporate lobbying

EU legislation to clean up supply chains and corporate governance has been delayed after fierce industry lobbying. Voluntary commitments have repeatedly failed, now it is time for decisive regulatory action.

MEPs seek to hold firms liable for supply-chain abuses

MEPs on the legal affairs committee are calling on the European Commission to urgently propose a new law that holds companies accountable for human rights or environmental abuses that happen across their supply chains.

Israel's besmirching of Palestine NGOs must be reversed

The designation perfectly fits into Israel's long-conceived strategy to besmirch Palestinian civil society voices under false allegations of terrorism and antisemitism, while pressuring any international actor that grants them a hearing, and actively demanding their defunding.

Europe's deadly border policies

EU institutions and states abdicated their responsibilities for search-and-rescue operations in the Mediterranean, deputising Libya to take their place, withdrawing naval assets from high-seas corridors, and obstructing, even criminalising, NGO groups, writes the European director of Human Rights Watch.

News in Brief

  1. France and UK on edge of fishing sanctions-war
  2. Israel agrees 3,000 more settler homes, despite EU criticism
  3. Italy blocks anti gay-bashing law after Vatican lobbying
  4. EU gives Moldova €60m amid Russia gas crunch
  5. Bulgaria risks full lockdown as Covid infections surge
  6. Irish goods traffic with EU grew 36 percent since Brexit
  7. Europeans want trains instead of short-haul flights
  8. Boom time for hackers in pandemic, EU agency warns


Nothing as destructive as radical change

With Poland throwing the legal order of Europe in disarray, Russia rationing Europe's gas supply and the UK reneging on its Brexit commitments, perhaps the moment has come again to read a few essays by French philosopher Michel de Montaigne.

EU Green Deal is too dependent on private finance

What we call for is another approach to the financing of the European Grean Deal. While a lot of attention is being paid to decarbonisation, the other two aspects - de-financialisation and democratisation - are largely ignored.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNew report reveals bad environmental habits
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersImproving the integration of young refugees
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNATO Secretary General guest at the Session of the Nordic Council
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCan you love whoever you want in care homes?
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNineteen demands by Nordic young people to save biodiversity
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersSustainable public procurement is an effective way to achieve global goals

Latest News

  1. EU says No to patent-free vaccines for Africa
  2. COP26 climate summit: could it be different this time?
  3. EU top court orders Poland to pay €1m-a-day in rule-of-law row
  4. Revealed: EU migration plans for Morocco, Libya and others
  5. New EU banking rules ignore 'stranded assets', critics warn
  6. Israel's besmirching of Palestine NGOs must be reversed
  7. Environment ministers continue dogfight on energy price hike
  8. Most lawmakers unhappy with lead MEP's asylum bill

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us