Tuesday

5th Jul 2022

Column

Some lessons from George Orwell

Listen to article

"Pure pacifism can only appeal to people in very sheltered positions." While reading George Orwell's essay The Lion and The Unicorn, one must pinch oneself at times: this could have been written today.

Instead, Orwell wrote these lines in 1941.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • Under such circumstances, Orwell argued, 'pacifism is an intellectual curiosity rather than a political movement'

First of all, a caveat: Orwell got it wrong with his main message.

In the essay, he argues that the United Kingdom would only be able to defeat Hitler's fascism under a socialist government, and that the same held true the other way round: the fight against fascism would eventually lead to the establishment of socialism. He was convinced that only by nationalising factories all forces could be truly mobilised towards the war effort and defeating the enemy.

As we know, fascism was not defeated by a socialist UK. Moreover, the country became social democratic only after the war — and not because workers united, but because employers and industrialists understood that happier workers would be less susceptible to communist ideals.

As elsewhere in Europe, the welfare state was introduced to stop communism from spreading further.

Nevertheless, this essay contains many sharp observations that are relevant to this day, like much of Orwell's other work.

For example, he raises an important question we have been wrestling with since Russia invaded in Ukraine in February: is it possible at all to be a pacifist in these times?

Orwell, a lifelong socialist, was a member of the Independent Labour Party. But he was fiercely critical of the party, because it dismissed Stalin's excesses and refused rearmament. It was opposed to war in principle, and wanted to stay out.

Orwell, on the other hand, became convinced one had to defend democracy against fascism and totalitarianism.

This is why, in the 1930s, he went to fight in the Spanish civil war. He complained about British champagne-socialists, more attached to their mansions and privileges than to the cause of democracy. "The lady in the Rolls-Royce car is more damaging to morale than a fleet of Goering's bombing planes," he wrote.

When reading this, it is difficult not to think of German chancellor Olaf Scholz, who has trouble convincing his fellow countrymen that in the face of evil Germany must send heavy weapons to Ukraine, not just send helmets and field hospitals.

Under such circumstances, Orwell argued, "pacifism is an intellectual curiosity rather than a political movement".

He describes how British entrepreneurs, three weeks before the outbreak of the war in Europe, had quickly sold huge quantities of tin, rubber and copper to Germany.

This, of course, reminds us of German politicians who, after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, kept saying the Nord Stream 2 pipeline — now halted — was a purely economic project.

"The whole moneyed class, unwilling to face a change in their way of life, had shut their eyes to the nature of fascism and modern war," Orwell wrote. To him, one of the dominant facts in English life in the previous 75 years was "the decay of ability of the ruling class".

Managers vs Leaders

This is to a large extent our problem now. Europe's political leaders are mostly managers. They are used to floating on the waves of globalisation at a time when steering the ship of state was hardly necessary, when vision was almost a handicap, and when identity and transparency seemed to be the main issues in society.

Each era, of course, produces its own leaders. Now, in a major geopolitical storm, with the drums of war beating again, different leaders are needed — more heavyweight, with a deeper understanding of the world.

What is striking about Orwell's essay, in contrast to our present times, is its optimism. He sketches a path into the future, offering readers a narrative with a broader perspective — something to help them understand the world.

In his book Comment Gouverner un Peuple-Roi? (2021), the French philosopher Pierre-Henri Tavoillot wrote that in a democracy, it is not enough just to have elections, parliamentary debates, independent institutions and a free press.

While these are of course vital in a democracy, they remain separate elements that only get meaning if they are embedded in a deeper, larger narrative full of wisdom, emotion, poetry and (self)-reflection. "Storytelling cultivates public consciousness," Tavoillot writes, because it weaves the loose elements together.

Orwell did exactly that: telling the bigger story, providing context. This is why we still read him today, despite his political misjudgments.

Today, like in Orwell's days, citizens have big questions. For decades, we assumed our lives, economies and democracies would only get better. Many now lose that feeling.

Having been peaceful for over seven decades, Europe is more prosperous than ever. At the moment, however, our confidence in the future gives way to a deep sense of vulnerability.

In 1968, people took to the streets because they wanted to have better lives than their parents. Nowadays, they take to the streets because they want to keep what their parents have.

With the war in Ukraine raging and power-hungry autocrats weaponising data, refugees, water, and gas supplies, European citizens ask, "Will there be war again in Europe?" and "What will be left of the welfare state?"

They are hungry for information and analysis. Most politicians hardly provide this. They talk about purchasing-power, diversity, or housing problems.

Those are important issues, but the larger narrative is missing. No wonder populists and political charlatans jump in, supplying grand, simplistic theories full of hatred and fear.

We live in a time of great transformations. So did Orwell.

"War is the greatest of all agents of change," he wrote. "It speeds up all processes, wipes out minor distinctions, brings realities to the surface. Above all, war brings it home to the individual. That he is not altogether an individual."

This is what is now at stake in Europe, too.

Author bio

Caroline de Gruyter is Europe correspondent and columnist for the Dutch newspaper NRC, Foreign Policy and De Standaard. This column is adapted from a recent piece in De Standaard.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

The moral cost of 'social peace' in Germany

Germany remains the main obstacle to European sanctions on the Russian oil & gas industry. When will the Zeitenwende ['turning point' in German energy policy] finally deliver?

The Digital Services Act — a case-study in keeping public in dark

Companies and lobby groups like Spotify, Google and International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) were able to lobby member states using live knowledge of the trilogue discussions on content-ranking systems, advertising and liability for search engines.

Is China a challenge to Nato? Beijing responds

The Chinese mission to the EU responds to last week's Madrid Nato summit, which stated China posed "systemic challenges" and warned against the "deepening strategic partnership between Russia and China".

The human rights aspects of Grenoble's 'burkini' controversy

Sooner or later, the European Court of Human Rights will have a final say on whether Grenoble is allowed to permit the 'burkini'. Its judgment, like the one permitting the outlawing of full-face veils, risks influencing policymaking across the continent.

The Digital Services Act — a case-study in keeping public in dark

Companies and lobby groups like Spotify, Google and International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) were able to lobby member states using live knowledge of the trilogue discussions on content-ranking systems, advertising and liability for search engines.

Council must act on core of EU migration package

By only screening, fingerprinting or relocating (some) refugees, or by outsourcing our border control to Turkey and giving Erdogan our keys, we will not solve the current problems.

News in Brief

  1. Turkey signs Nato protocol despite Sweden extradition row
  2. European gas production hit by Norway strike
  3. EU Commission told to step up fight against CAP fraud
  4. Ukraine needs €719bn to rebuild, says PM
  5. Germany records first monthly trade deficit since 1991
  6. Pilots from Denmark, Norway, and Sweden strike
  7. Report: EU to sign hydrogen deal with Namibia
  8. Israel and Poland to mend relations

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  4. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers for culture: Protect Ukraine’s cultural heritage!
  6. Reuters InstituteDigital News Report 2022

Latest News

  1. EU Parliament sued over secrecy on Nazi MEP expenses
  2. Italy glacier tragedy has 'everything to do' with climate change
  3. The Digital Services Act — a case-study in keeping public in dark
  4. Report slams German opposition to new child sexual abuse rules
  5. Is China a challenge to Nato? Beijing responds
  6. ECB announces major green shift in corporate bond-buying
  7. Ex-Frontex chief 'uninvited' from parliament committee
  8. Czech presidency and key nuclear/gas vote This WEEK

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us