28th Mar 2023


EU buries head deeper in sand over Israel's apartheid

  • Abusive and discriminatory practices by Israeli authorities are not new: they further a policy to maintain the domination by Jewish Israelis over Palestinians and take place in the context of systematic oppression of Palestinians (Photo: Northern Lights 119)
Listen to article

The recent spike in deadly attacks and repression in the occupied West Bank should surprise no one. Last year, Israeli forces killed more Palestinians than in any other year since 2005, when the UN began systematically recording fatalities: 151, including 35 children. A little over a month, a new year and another Netanyahu-led government, the situation is only getting worse.

The government, which identified as a guiding principle that all the territory between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea, belongs "exclusive[ly]" to the Jewish people, is already implementing measures to further that agenda.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

  • EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell: 'the EU Commission considers that it is not appropriate to associate the term apartheid with the State of Israel' (Photo: European Commission)

Those measures include expediting demolitions of Palestinians' homes as well as expanding settlements in the West Bank — which are illegal under international law.

The government has also responded to Palestinian attacks on Israelis with collective punishment, a war crime in the occupied territory, including razing attackers' family homes.

These abusive and discriminatory practices by Israeli authorities are not new: they further a policy to maintain the domination by Jewish Israelis over Palestinians and take place in the context of systematic oppression of Palestinians, which collectively amount to the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution.

This conclusion, reached by Human Rights Watch and other international, Israeli and Palestinian human rights groups, legal and UN experts — among many others — should make it impossible for the EU to continue to pretend that the repression of Palestinians is a temporary phenomenon best addressed in the context of the "peace process."

And yet, that's exactly what the EU continues to do, recycling age-old empty slogans about the "two-state solution" and the need to restore calm, restraint and the status quo.

But while every European diplomat knows that a return to the "status quo" means maintaining the daily oppression, humiliation and anguish that comes with living under apartheid, the EU continues to acquiesce to a situation that gets worse by the day.

In May 2021, following another round of hostilities in Gaza, the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) adopted a resolution establishing a Commission of Inquiry to look at the root causes of the conflict.

But no EU member state then in the HRC voted in favour of the resolution, in stark contrast with their principled support — if not leadership — on setting up monitoring and/or accountability mechanisms on most other country situations on the Human Rights Council.

Fast forward to last December, when all EU states, except Belgium, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland, Portugal, and Slovenia, refused to support a UN General Assembly resolution requesting an advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice on, amongst other issues, the legal consequences of Israel's prolonged occupation and adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures.

As EU governments continued to display patent double-standards at the UN, the EU Commission responded to a series of parliamentary questions on the apartheid determination.

Apartheid 'not appropriate'

The replies, nominally signed by EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell on behalf of the commission, all say: "the commission considers that it is not appropriate to associate the term apartheid with the State of Israel."

The ambiguous wording, of course, creates a straw man. There is no such thing as an apartheid state, as far as international law is concerned, any more than there is a"torture state or war crimes state. Apartheid and persecution are well-defined international crimes against humanity, crimes that Israeli authorities are committing.

Furthermore, the EU Commission spoke on its own behalf: it did not, and cannot, express the EU's foreign policy position on the issue, which would require a unanimous determination by the 27 EU member states' governments.

Yet, the sleight of hand might suffice for some to inaccurately claim an "EU denial" of the apartheid determination — something that would put the bloc at odds with growing consensus in the human rights movement and increasingly beyond. Ultimately, all the sibylline replies do is slyly providing thin cover for this new Israel's government as it doubles down on apartheid and intensifies its brutal repression of Palestinians.

It is all the more galling that the EU is taking these steps at the same time that it rightfully rallies the world around defence of the rules-based international order and human rights when it comes to Russia and Ukraine. The very same EU and member have put in place unprecedented efforts to secure global support ahead of UN votes condemning Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

They have adopted an enormous array of sanctions, systematically denounced war crimes and other abuses, and supported serious efforts to document them, with a view to securing accountability.

The contrast with their shameful silence, inaction and denialism vis a vis the victims of the Israeli authorities' crimes of apartheid and persecution is stark and impossible to deny. This position not only fuels the spiralling violence and repression in Israel and Palestine, but also undermines the EU's and its member states' credibility as principled foreign policy actors.

The EU needs to get its head out of the sand, recognise the reality of apartheid and take the sort of human rights measures that a situation of this gravity warrants, including supporting efforts to ensure accountability for and ending all forms of complicity in serious abuses.

Author bio

Claudio Francavilla is the senior EU advocate at Human Rights Watch.


The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Israel's besmirching of Palestine NGOs must be reversed

The designation perfectly fits into Israel's long-conceived strategy to besmirch Palestinian civil society voices under false allegations of terrorism and antisemitism, while pressuring any international actor that grants them a hearing, and actively demanding their defunding.

The first anniversary of the Abraham Accords

More than 55 agreements between Israel, the UAE and Bahrain are currently underway. These lay the foundation for practical cooperation in almost all fields including: finance, communications, economy, culture, tourism, taxation, investment protection, freedom of movement, water, agriculture and energy.

Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity

From the perspective of international relations, the EU is a rare bird indeed. Theoretically speaking it cannot even exist. The charter of the United Nations, which underlies the current system of global governance, distinguishes between states and organisations of states.


Okay, alright, AI might be useful after all

Large Language Models could give the powers trained data-journalists wield, to regular boring journalists like me — who don't know how to use Python. And that makes me tremendously excited, to be honest.

How much can we trust Russian opinion polls on the war?

The lack of Russian opposition to the Russo-Ukrainian War is puzzling. The war is going nowhere, Russian casualties are staggering, the economy is in trouble, and living standards are declining, and yet polls indicate that most Russians support the war.

Latest News

  1. Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity
  2. Finnish elections and Hungary's Nato vote in focus This WEEK
  3. EU's new critical raw materials act could be a recipe for conflict
  4. Okay, alright, AI might be useful after all
  5. Von der Leyen pledges to help return Ukrainian children
  6. EU leaders agree 1m artillery shells for Ukraine
  7. Polish abortion rights activist vows to appeal case
  8. How German business interests have shaped EU climate agenda

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality
  5. Promote UkraineInvitation to the National Demonstration in solidarity with Ukraine on 25.02.2023
  6. Azerbaijan Embassy9th Southern Gas Corridor Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting and 1st Green Energy Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us