Friday

29th Sep 2023

Opinion

Germany's new security strategy — much ado about nothing

  • German chancellor Olaf Scholz, as the Munich Security Conference. Much of the government's new security strategy is so anodyne, it could easily be done by ChatGPT (Photo: securityconference.org)
Listen to article

Last week, Germany's long-awaited National Security Strategy of Germany was released. Expectations were high, after months of delays and infighting among Berlin's 'traffic-light' coalition partners.

Many observers excepted a roar, but heard only a mere whimper in the end. To put it mildly, the document is a nice compilation of already existing "strategic" documents, such as the Indo-Pacific guidelines, released in September 2020. But to make those documents of real value, the strategy should have begun with an honest reflection on what went wrong and on the distorted perceptions which have shaped German foreign relations since 1990.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Simple references to noble principles, such as rules-based multilateralism, might be good for the bedside prayers of German policymakers, but they remain far away from where real strategic discussion must begin.

And this discussion requires the courage to get rid of lifelong lies, such as Germany one day obtaining a permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council, and instead concentrate on achievable goals.

Further, it is hard to believe that this paper will be the starting point of a broader public discussion on the objectives of German foreign policy within a European framework. Compared to the much-acclaimed "Zeitenwende", the language of the strategy, let alone its concrete proposals, is much softer in tone.

One might benevolently interpret this as the result of endless rounds of inter-ministerial coordination.

But closer to the truth is that there are simply no new ideas on Germany's future foreign relations. Reaction is and will remain the modus operandi, partially out of a lack of capacities, and partially because acting in a courageous and decisive manner in foreign affairs can still spell political suicide for German politicians. The 'Deutscher Michel' might be willing to contribute financially, but largely wishes to remain uninvolved in the world's quarrels.

Expectations by European partners for German leadership will again go unfulfilled. A pathetic paragraph on the Franco-German friendship (unwillingly?) reflects the near brain-death of the former engine of European integration.

There is an absence of any forward-looking reflection on the consequences of a radically changing power geometry within the European Union and how Germany should proactively adjust to it.

Incidentally, within German and European expert circles, discussions on Germany's future objectives and the necessary steps to be taken are already much more advanced.

Highlighting a few key points may serve the analysis at this stage: a clear signal that the writings on the geopolitical wall had been read could have been a concrete proposal for a reform of institutional structure of German foreign and security policy.

The fragmentation between different ministries and state agencies has been criticised for years as no longer being suitable in a radically different global environment. Repeated demands for an overhaul of competences and resource allocation trudged along slowly between different ministries.

The establishment of a National Security Council has been brought forward for years — in vain.

Lack of policy coordination continues on the ground abroad. The paper correctly acknowledges that the huge financial contributions of Germany to international organisations and third countries don't translate in appropriate political leverage.

But here again, different line responsibilities, institutional cultures and the lack of shared understanding of objectives prevent a larger and long-lasting impact.

Bloodless

Moving further to the European level, Germany often claims to be the model boy of European integration.

Given recent developments in European foreign, security and defence policy, the reference to the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Strategic Compass remains rather bloodless. If not now, when should have been the time for more concrete proposals for a future European defence and security architecture.

And then comes the budget. You don't have to be a number cruncher to realise that the current defence budget of two percent of GDP, including the special fund for the Bundeswehr, are far from covering the promised contribution on the way to becoming Europe and Nato's logistics turntable.

And dilemmas of resource allocation in times of economic recession and rising public debt should be put on the table to initiative public debate.

Where people and our allies need more clarity, is the 'hard power' of Germany's engagement. In terms of future weapons development, the impact of cutting-edge technologies such as AI, and control on arms exports, the strategy seems to be avoiding any clear position — a clear result of long-term disputes among the governing parties.

But those restrictions will not enhance Germany's "interoperability" among its allies. The same goes for the German intelligence service, whose scope of operations has been systematically crippled in recent years by decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court.

All in all, the real objective of understanding the fundamentally changing nature of threats, how they interact with each other and what new instruments are needed, cannot be achieved, because the necessary work simply has not been done. Listing well-known problems and phrases don't make for an integrated, forward-looking strategy.

Perhaps the time for national strategies is past.

This paper, conceptually-speaking, is one of the weakest documents released by the German government in recent years. One can't help but call it a true waste of the capacities of highly-qualified and well-paid civil servants, having spent months and years drafting a paper of very limited use. These days, such an exercise could easily be done by ChatGPT.

In other words, don't expect much from Germany's new strategy on China, which we've also been waiting on for more than a year.

Author bio

Peter Hefele is policy director of the Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, the official think-tank of the centre-right European People's Party.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Column

Germany's new security strategy; balancing, not shaping

Germany's new security strategy signals the nation's pacifism has become a victim of Russia's war on Ukraine. But simultaneously, the strategy is neither specific or hard-hitting in its analysis on how to deal with a shifting world order.

Feature

Germany as a laboratory of 'communism vs capitalism'

A new exhibition at the Deutsches Historiches Musuem in Berlin unveils industrial photography of Germany's steel, coal, car, chemical and textile industries from the 1950s to 1980s — some in East Germany, some in West. But which was which?

Column

What's the point of the OSCE if everyone just ignores it?

The governments that spend all that money on the OSCE? They shrugged and sent congratulatory telegrams to Turkey's president Erdoğan regardless. Same in Poland: twice the OSCE found its elections violated international norms for democratic elections. Reaction? Zero.

Time for a reset: EU regional funding needs overhauling

Vasco Alves Cordeiro, president of the European Committee of the Regions, is advocating a revamp of the EU's regional policy so that it better supports all regions in addressing major challenges such as the green and digital transitions.

How do you make embarrassing EU documents 'disappear'?

The EU Commission's new magic formula for avoiding scrutiny is simple. You declare the documents in question to be "short-lived correspondence for a preliminary exchange of views" and thus exempt them from being logged in the official inventory.

Column

Will Poles vote for the end of democracy?

International media must make clear that these are not fair, democratic elections. The flawed race should be the story at least as much as the race itself.

Latest News

  1. Poland's culture of fear after three years of abortion 'ban'
  2. Time for a reset: EU regional funding needs overhauling
  3. Germany tightens police checks on Czech and Polish border
  4. EU Ombudsman warns of 'new normal' of crisis decision-making
  5. How do you make embarrassing EU documents 'disappear'?
  6. Resurgent Fico hopes for Slovak comeback at Saturday's election
  7. EU and US urge Azerbijan to allow aid access to Armenians
  8. EU warns of Russian 'mass manipulation' as elections loom

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Medical Devices Regulators Forum (IMDRF)Join regulators, industry & healthcare experts at the 24th IMDRF session, September 25-26, Berlin. Register by 20 Sept to join in person or online.
  2. UNOPSUNOPS begins works under EU-funded project to repair schools in Ukraine
  3. Georgia Ministry of Foreign AffairsGeorgia effectively prevents sanctions evasion against Russia – confirm EU, UK, USA
  4. International Medical Devices Regulators Forum (IMDRF)Join regulators & industry experts at the 24th IMDRF session- Berlin September 25-26. Register early for discounted hotel rates
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersGlobal interest in the new Nordic Nutrition Recommendations – here are the speakers for the launch
  6. Nordic Council of Ministers20 June: Launch of the new Nordic Nutrition Recommendations

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. International Sustainable Finance CentreJoin CEE Sustainable Finance Summit, 15 – 19 May 2023, high-level event for finance & business
  2. ICLEISeven actionable measures to make food procurement in Europe more sustainable
  3. World BankWorld Bank Report Highlights Role of Human Development for a Successful Green Transition in Europe
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic summit to step up the fight against food loss and waste
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersThink-tank: Strengthen co-operation around tech giants’ influence in the Nordics
  6. EFBWWEFBWW calls for the EC to stop exploitation in subcontracting chains

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us