Thursday

22nd Aug 2019

Stakeholder

No ETS deal means it can still be strengthened

  • The EU Emissions Trading Scheme is the only feasible instrument at the European level to foster a cost-effective reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. (Photo: Alicja)

In their latest trilogue meeting, the European Commission, Council and Parliament were not able to reach an agreement on the reform for the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). While this news was disappointing, the lack of an agreement could also turn into an opportunity since it can still be discussed and strengthened.

The long and arduous debate among European institutions and EU stakeholders confirms the relevance of the ETS in EU policy. We see it as key to ensuring a sustainable future for Europe's economy while protecting its competitiveness and growth.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 18 year's of archives. 30 days free trial.

... or join as a group

The debate has taken over two years and after exhausting negotiations, the European institutions have yet to reach an agreement. This is an alarm bell for industry and for the power sector in particular, a business that needs clarity in the legal and regulatory framework and a functioning carbon market to allow stable and long-term investments and operations.

Doubling the MSR intake rate

I consider the EU ETS to be the only feasible instrument at the European level to foster a cost-effective reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, thereby supporting European countries in reaching Paris climate targets.

The ETS can and should be strengthened by doubling the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) intake rate to 24 percent, bringing forward by one year the cancellation of the future MSR surplus allowances and increasing the linear reduction rate.

These measures, if applied, would secure a robust system, provide the right supply and demand balance for allowances and a long-term price signal to both operators and investors.

The proposed introduction of alternative instruments, inconsistent with ETS design, partly explain why negotiations have been drawn out.

These instruments include a carbon tax, the Emission Performance Standard and other measures which though seemingly attractive, can only have a national perspective.

If applied, these measures would negatively affect a well-designed EU ETS and in practice would fail to have sufficient support across the EU member states.

These measures only serve to undermine ETS negotiations and would weaken the only EU market instrument whose strengthening could have positive effects in the short term.

Industrialised economies

The EU ETS is the most suitable system for developed and innovative economies like those of EU countries.

A cap-and-trade system such as the EU ETS is the most efficient mechanism to reduce emissions in the industrial sectors, especially in industrialised economies.

Indeed, by setting up a cap emission target, the effectiveness in achieving environmental objectives is guaranteed, while the price signal established by the market can ensure economic efficiency while minimising costs.

Other measures aimed at monetising emissions, such as the introduction of national carbon taxes for installations covered by ETS, are not as effective because they would introduce distortions to competition without lowering emissions.

A carbon tax is only a viable tool for areas not covered by the ETS such as agriculture, transport, residential and services. It is better suited to countries with a weaker institutional framework and sectors characterised by distributed emission sources.

ETS key to zero-emission economy

However, to get a better picture of the current backdrop it is also worth having a look at the different approaches taken to mitigate climate change in the past.

The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC – 1992) was a collective action undertaken by all UN Countries to mitigate climate change, and the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention (1997) established a top-down approach with quantified emission reduction or limitation commitments for Developed Countries and Economies in Transition.

The EU ETS was adopted in 2003 to fulfil the reduction commitments made by the EU under the Kyoto Protocol.

The Paris Agreement, signed in 2015, emerged from a different balance among world economies, with major emitters, that this time also include both developed and developing countries, taking an obligation to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.

In this transition to a zero-emission economy under the guidance of the bottom-up approach of the Paris Agreement, the ETS remains a key instrument to limiting emissions in a cost-effective manner. It provides certainty in the emission reduction outcome and thus facilitates international cooperation and investment.

The EU has the unique experience of running and optimising the biggest cap-and trade system in the world and should maintain its global leadership by giving a clear political message and approving a strengthened EU ETS which is key to enhancing the EU's climate, energy and industrial strategy.

Author bio

Simone Mori is the Head of European Affairs at Enel.

Disclaimer

This article is sponsored by a third party. All opinions in this article reflect the views of the author and not of EUobserver.

Investigation

After spending €587 million, EU has zero CO2 storage plants

The EU has spent at least €587 million so far on carbon capture and storage, and was willing to spend millions more. However, after a decade not a single power plant in the EU is currently using the technology.

Europe holds off on storing CO2

Most reports looking at long-term climate scenarios agree that some form of carbon capture and storage is needed. However, its deployment has been stalled in the EU.

FIFA's schools programme aims to reach 700m children

Football clubs today invest huge sums of money in youth development and court talented young players from an early age. Children are the future – not only where football is concerned, but also for society in general.

Climate policy in Nordics: how to maximise global impact?

To maximise the global impact of climate policy, Norwegian economists recommend a shift of focus - from national emissions reductions, to clean technology development and better use of international emissions-trading systems, notably EU market mechanisms.

Stakeholders' Views

This EUobserver section provides a platform for EU stakeholders to communicate positions, views and activities.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAUNESDA reduces added sugars 11.9% between 2015-2017
  2. International Partnership for Human RightsEU-Uzbekistan Human Rights Dialogue: EU to raise key fundamental rights issues
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNo evidence that social media are harmful to young people
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCanada to host the joint Nordic cultural initiative 2021
  5. Vote for the EU Sutainable Energy AwardsCast your vote for your favourite EUSEW Award finalist. You choose the winner of 2019 Citizen’s Award.
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersEducation gets refugees into work
  7. Counter BalanceSign the petition to help reform the EU’s Bank
  8. UNICEFChild rights organisations encourage candidates for EU elections to become Child Rights Champions
  9. UNESDAUNESDA Outlines 2019-2024 Aspirations: Sustainability, Responsibility, Competitiveness
  10. Counter BalanceRecord citizens’ input to EU bank’s consultation calls on EIB to abandon fossil fuels
  11. International Partnership for Human RightsAnnual EU-Turkmenistan Human Rights Dialogue takes place in Ashgabat
  12. Nordic Council of MinistersNew campaign: spot, capture and share Traces of North

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersLeading Nordic candidates go head-to-head in EU election debate
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNew Secretary General: Nordic co-operation must benefit everybody
  3. Platform for Peace and JusticeMEP Kati Piri: “Our red line on Turkey has been crossed”
  4. UNICEF2018 deadliest year yet for children in Syria as war enters 9th year
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic commitment to driving global gender equality
  6. International Partnership for Human RightsMeet your defender: Rasul Jafarov leading human rights defender from Azerbaijan
  7. UNICEFUNICEF Hosts MEPs in Jordan Ahead of Brussels Conference on the Future of Syria
  8. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic talks on parental leave at the UN
  9. International Partnership for Human RightsTrial of Chechen prisoner of conscience and human rights activist Oyub Titiev continues.
  10. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic food policy inspires India to be a sustainable superpower
  11. Nordic Council of MinistersMilestone for Nordic-Baltic e-ID
  12. Counter BalanceEU bank urged to free itself from fossil fuels and take climate leadership

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us