Monday

17th Jan 2022

Stakeholder

No ETS deal means it can still be strengthened

  • The EU Emissions Trading Scheme is the only feasible instrument at the European level to foster a cost-effective reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. (Photo: Alicja)

In their latest trilogue meeting, the European Commission, Council and Parliament were not able to reach an agreement on the reform for the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). While this news was disappointing, the lack of an agreement could also turn into an opportunity since it can still be discussed and strengthened.

The long and arduous debate among European institutions and EU stakeholders confirms the relevance of the ETS in EU policy. We see it as key to ensuring a sustainable future for Europe's economy while protecting its competitiveness and growth.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The debate has taken over two years and after exhausting negotiations, the European institutions have yet to reach an agreement. This is an alarm bell for industry and for the power sector in particular, a business that needs clarity in the legal and regulatory framework and a functioning carbon market to allow stable and long-term investments and operations.

Doubling the MSR intake rate

I consider the EU ETS to be the only feasible instrument at the European level to foster a cost-effective reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, thereby supporting European countries in reaching Paris climate targets.

The ETS can and should be strengthened by doubling the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) intake rate to 24 percent, bringing forward by one year the cancellation of the future MSR surplus allowances and increasing the linear reduction rate.

These measures, if applied, would secure a robust system, provide the right supply and demand balance for allowances and a long-term price signal to both operators and investors.

The proposed introduction of alternative instruments, inconsistent with ETS design, partly explain why negotiations have been drawn out.

These instruments include a carbon tax, the Emission Performance Standard and other measures which though seemingly attractive, can only have a national perspective.

If applied, these measures would negatively affect a well-designed EU ETS and in practice would fail to have sufficient support across the EU member states.

These measures only serve to undermine ETS negotiations and would weaken the only EU market instrument whose strengthening could have positive effects in the short term.

Industrialised economies

The EU ETS is the most suitable system for developed and innovative economies like those of EU countries.

A cap-and-trade system such as the EU ETS is the most efficient mechanism to reduce emissions in the industrial sectors, especially in industrialised economies.

Indeed, by setting up a cap emission target, the effectiveness in achieving environmental objectives is guaranteed, while the price signal established by the market can ensure economic efficiency while minimising costs.

Other measures aimed at monetising emissions, such as the introduction of national carbon taxes for installations covered by ETS, are not as effective because they would introduce distortions to competition without lowering emissions.

A carbon tax is only a viable tool for areas not covered by the ETS such as agriculture, transport, residential and services. It is better suited to countries with a weaker institutional framework and sectors characterised by distributed emission sources.

ETS key to zero-emission economy

However, to get a better picture of the current backdrop it is also worth having a look at the different approaches taken to mitigate climate change in the past.

The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC – 1992) was a collective action undertaken by all UN Countries to mitigate climate change, and the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention (1997) established a top-down approach with quantified emission reduction or limitation commitments for Developed Countries and Economies in Transition.

The EU ETS was adopted in 2003 to fulfil the reduction commitments made by the EU under the Kyoto Protocol.

The Paris Agreement, signed in 2015, emerged from a different balance among world economies, with major emitters, that this time also include both developed and developing countries, taking an obligation to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.

In this transition to a zero-emission economy under the guidance of the bottom-up approach of the Paris Agreement, the ETS remains a key instrument to limiting emissions in a cost-effective manner. It provides certainty in the emission reduction outcome and thus facilitates international cooperation and investment.

The EU has the unique experience of running and optimising the biggest cap-and trade system in the world and should maintain its global leadership by giving a clear political message and approving a strengthened EU ETS which is key to enhancing the EU's climate, energy and industrial strategy.

Author bio

Simone Mori is the Head of European Affairs at Enel.

Disclaimer

This article is sponsored by a third party. All opinions in this article reflect the views of the author and not of EUobserver.

Investigation

After spending €587 million, EU has zero CO2 storage plants

The EU has spent at least €587 million so far on carbon capture and storage, and was willing to spend millions more. However, after a decade not a single power plant in the EU is currently using the technology.

Europe holds off on storing CO2

Most reports looking at long-term climate scenarios agree that some form of carbon capture and storage is needed. However, its deployment has been stalled in the EU.

Podcasts: Nordic voices on the green transition

How close are we to battery-powered planes? What effect has Greta Thunberg had on the attitudes of her fellow Swedes? Is small-scale farming the future? These are some of the questions up for discussion in a new podcast series.

Letter

Adhering to the right direction of China-EU relations

After four years in Brussels, ambassador Zhang Ming, head of Chinese Mission to the EU, comes to the end of his tenure. Here is his farewell letter on his feelings about working in Brussels and his aspiration for China-EU relations.

News in Brief

  1. French parliament agrees stricter vaccine-pass system
  2. US speaks to energy firms about EU gas cut-off scenario
  3. Anti-vax protests held in the Netherlands, Hungary, Austria
  4. German MEP spends €690,000 on office renovation
  5. Microsoft identified destructive malware in Ukraine agencies
  6. Danish intelligence crisis deepens
  7. Hackers expose Polish military secrets
  8. Swedish soldiers might leave Sahel due to Russian fighters

Pandemic recovery spotlighted at Prague European Summit 2021

This year's Prague European Summit will focus on three main topics - the post-pandemic recovery, EU external relations - especially in the Neighbourhood Policy - and future trends and policies, with a focus on the 'digital decade'.

Latest News

  1. James Kanter, Shada Islam are new editors at EUobserver
  2. The loopholes and low bar in Macron's push for a global tax
  3. No love for Russia in latest EU strategy
  4. New EU Parliament chief elected This WEEK
  5. Lead MEP now wants ETS opt-out for homes and private cars
  6. MEPs seek probe into EU commissioner over Bosnia
  7. EU's Borrell contradicts Germany on Russia gas pipeline
  8. It's time for a more geopolitical EU-Turkey cooperation

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us