Tuesday

9th Aug 2022

EU-Ukraine association pact: avoiding ratification

  • The treaty could in this way enter into life even if one or another parliament in an EU country says No to ratification (Photo: thisisbossi)

Before the furore over Yulia Tymoshenko's bruises and Euro2012 Ukraine and the European Union initialed their Association Agreement on 30 March. It seemed like progress, albeit of a technical nature, with the hardest part of the job ahead.

Diplomatic sources say the the ink was put only on the political association part of the pact. Meanwhile, only the first and last pages of the "deep and comprehensive" free trade section were initialled because the two sides are still fine-tuning the legal language in some areas.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The negotiations started back in 2007. They were announced ended on 19 December 2011.

The pact was not initialled there and then - as planned - because there was lack of political will amid the furore over democratic standards.

The date of intialling became a source of much media speculation in the weeks that followed. The EU kept complaining about democratic values and Kiev kept hoping the problem would somehow go away.

What kind of progress does the 30 March initialling actually mean, however? It was done purely for public consumption because it does not carry any legal weight. After all, there are still many hurdles to overcome before the pact is actually signed, let alone ratified by the 27 EU governments and Ukraine.

For his part, Valeriy Chaly, the deputy head of the Kiev-based think-tank, the Razumkov Center, believes Ukraine has still not made up its mind about whether it really wants EU integration.

"Today there still exists the variant that the initialing could be the last thing that ever happens with the association agreement, and that would be a great loss for Ukraine. The ruling regime must back up its declarations that it has chosen the EU path with real action. In the balance between personal, tactical interests and the national strategic interest, EU integration is the only way - it is supported by the majority of citizens and political parties. There is no alternative," he said.

EU Neighbourhood Commissioner Stefan Fuele told Kiev in February "the agreement would be signed in autumn if the situation changes."

There is little doubt he was referring to some kind of civilised solution to the jailing of ex-prime-minister Yulia Tymoshenko and ex-interior-minister Yuriy Lutsenko.

He was also alluding to democratic standards in the parliamentary elections in autumn. These will stand under a democratic question mark if Tymoshenko, the main political opponent, remains blocked from taking part in the vote.

"The elections will be the final benchmark when EU-Ukraine relations will be defined," Polish right-wing MEP Marek Siwiec has said.

The question of ratification is even more complicated. One EU diplomat has said that because of the political situation "ratification appears to be something that would happen in a very long perspective, if ever."

Germany and France were in the past the most sceptical member states when it came to Ukraine's EU aspirations. But now that camp is getting bigger. The state of democracy in Ukraine gives the sceptics an opportunity to destroy its EU hopes. At the same time, Ukraine is doing nothing to counter this.

Ukraine's ministry of foreign affairs is even considering a plan B. Under this scenario, the EU would after the signature put in place interim measures for applying the economic and political parts of the treaty.

"After signing the agreement, we could temporarily use it before the ratification by the national parliaments. Ratification is a very long process and could last for several years," Ukrainian deputy foreign minister Pavlo Klimkon said earlier this month.

It is possible to take this step under EU law and Ukraine is counting on it.

All it would need is the green light from the European Parliament and the Verkhovna Rada. The treaty could in this way enter into life even if one or another parliament in an EU country says No to ratification.

And it would mean Ukraine could duck EU demands on democracy and "selective justice."

This scenario makes the signature of the treaty the key moment in the process. And I am quite sure the EU understands Kiev's thinking on the interim measures - would it really let the regime off the hook in this way?

There is little to celebrate in the (partial) initialling. The only way toward firm relations with the Union is through reform of legal and democratic standards.

The writer is a freelance journalist in Ukraine

Rape case shames EU-aspirant Ukraine

A horrific assault on a young woman in Ukraine has highlighted the culture of legal nihilism in a country which says it wants to join the European Union.

Opinion

Tymoshenko trial: Gas, lies and stereotypes

Most Western diplomats and media do not understand the details of the Tymoshenko trial, but are happy to dive in on her side, argues Ilona Iarmoliuk.

EU snubs Ukraine, again

EU Council President Van Rompuy - the Union's highest official in protocol terms - has told Ukraine's prime minister he is not welcome in the EU capital.

EU hopeful of Iran nuclear deal

A possible deal to revive the 2015 Iran nuclear pact is within reach, says the European Union. Washington backs the final proposals, but Tehran remains cautious.

Opinion

Let Taiwan's democracy shine brighter

Dr Ming-Yen Tsai, head of the Taipei Representative Office in the EU and Belgium, responds to EUobserver op-ed on Taiwan by the Chinese ambassador to Belgium. "Taiwan is an 'island of resilience'. That will continue to be the case."

Opinion

Supporting Taiwan 'like carrying water in a sieve'

China's ambassador to Belgium, Cao Zhongming, says the US has been distorting, obscuring and hollowing out the 'one-China' principle and unscrupulously undermining China's core interests. This is sheer double standards and a shameful act of bad faith.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWW – EFBH – FETBBConstruction workers can check wages and working conditions in 36 countries
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Canadian ministers join forces to combat harmful content online
  3. European Centre for Press and Media FreedomEuropean Anti-SLAPP Conference 2022
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers write to EU about new food labelling
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersEmerging journalists from the Nordics and Canada report the facts of the climate crisis
  6. Council of the EUEU: new rules on corporate sustainability reporting

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us