Wednesday

29th Mar 2023

China pressured EU on coronavirus report, Borrell admits

  • EU foreign affairs chief Josep Borrell (c) (Photo: consilium.europa.eu)

China did try to pressure the EU into diluting a report on coronavirus disinformation, the EU's top diplomat has admitted.

But this was just normal diplomacy, he added, while attacking an EU whistleblower.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

"China expressed its concern when they knew what the document contained and they did this through diplomatic channels," Borrell told MEPs in a videoconference on Thursday (30 April).

"Diplomatic démarches [complaints] can be accompanied by a range of incentives and disincentives, which don't even need to be explicitly mentioned," he added, in a hint of what the Chinese threatened.

"But everybody is doing this, including ourselves, and our closest partners," the former Spanish foreign minister also said.

The controversy concerned two EU foreign service reports on Chinese and Russian coronavirus information attacks.

The first one - an internal, 25-page EU text called an Information Environment Assessment (IEA) - was circulated among EU diplomats on 20 April and leaked to the Politico news website and, later, EUobserver.

The second text - a much shorter one called a "special report" - was published on the EU foreign service website on 24 April.

The second report mentioned China 15 times and accused it of "conspiracy narratives and disinformation".

But it used milder language than the IEA paper and omitted some examples, notably one about an ugly row between France and China on Chinese propaganda.

And in the meantime, US newspaper the New York Times obtained copies of internal EU emails saying Chinese pressure had diluted the public version of the EU text.

"The Chinese are already threatening with reactions if the [IEA] report comes out," Lutz Güllner, an EU official, said in one email the day after the Politico leak.

The EU was "self-censoring to appease the Chinese Communist Party," Monika Richter, an EU diplomat, said in another email.

For his part, Borrell also said, on Thursday, it was normal practice for diplomatic services to have internal reports that differed from public ones.

"These are two different products for two different audiences ... because we are dealing with very sensitive issues", he said.

But he denied that Chinese pressure had caused his personnel to water down accusations.

"We haven't bowed to anyone," Borrell said.

"There was no altering of our findings, no matter how uncomfortable they might be ... just read the [public] report," he said.

The public report omitted the Chinese-French row only because EU sub-editors ultimately deemed it an example of Chinese "bullying" not "disinformation," he added.

And he, personally, had no knowledge of the whole controversy until staff alerted him to it on 24 April, when he was having a day off for his wedding anniversary, Borrell said.

Shooting the messager

The foreign service chief voiced anger at those who leaked the IEA and internal emails to press.

Some MEPs referred to the leakers as ethical "whistleblowers".

But Borrell said: "It's clear we can't work on the basis of these kinds of lies, which are very damaging for our work".

The emails alleging EU "self-censorship" were "written with the aim of being leaked", he said.

"This is very serious," he added.

Borrell got broad support from senior MEPs in Thursday's video-meeting.

"I believe you're an honourable man and I accept your explanation," Radek Sikorski, a Polish former foreign minister, said.

"I was also in the diplomatic service for years and it's perfectly normal," Nathalie Loiseau, a French former EU affairs minister, added.

"It's clear the substance of the report hasn't changed," Reinhard Bütikofer, a German Green MEP, also said.

"I would be happy if all our [EU] leaders used the same kind of language," as the still-harsh China criticism in the EU's public text, Bütikofer added.

Speaking about Russian and Chinese propaganda more broadly, Borrell said on Thursday there was "an infodemic accompanying the pandemic".

His service had recorded 400 fake news items on the virus in recent weeks, he said.

Some of the Russian ones peddled fake cures which were "putting people's lives at risk", he added.

But the EU's debunking website had had an 800 percent increase in traffic since the pandemic began, with 10,000 readers a day, Borrell said, indicating the effectiveness of its work.

Borrell: Coronavirus has 'blown up' global order

"The coronavirus has ending blowing up the model of global multilateral governance that has been functioning over the past few years," EU foreign affairs chief Josep Borrell told a group of reporters on Thursday.

EU criticised for giving in to Beijing censorship

The EU's foreign affairs chief Josep Borrell called agreeing to Chinese censorship on the origins of coronavirus "misguided". Nevertheless, he said diplomacy works like that in China.

Column

What does China really want? Perhaps we could try asking

Perhaps even more surprising to the West was the fact that the Iran-Saudi Arabia deal was not brokered by the United States, or the European Union, but by the People's Republic of China. Since when was China mediating peace agreements?

Opinion

Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity

From the perspective of international relations, the EU is a rare bird indeed. Theoretically speaking it cannot even exist. The charter of the United Nations, which underlies the current system of global governance, distinguishes between states and organisations of states.

Latest News

  1. EU approves 2035 phaseout of polluting cars and vans
  2. New measures to shield the EU against money laundering
  3. What does China really want? Perhaps we could try asking
  4. Dear EU, the science is clear: burning wood for energy is bad
  5. Biden's 'democracy summit' poses questions for EU identity
  6. Finnish elections and Hungary's Nato vote in focus This WEEK
  7. EU's new critical raw materials act could be a recipe for conflict
  8. Okay, alright, AI might be useful after all

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. EFBWWEFBWW and FIEC do not agree to any exemptions to mandatory prior notifications in construction
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ways to prevent gender-based violence
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Economic gender equality now! Nordic ways to close the pension gap
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: Pushing back the push-back - Nordic solutions to online gender-based violence
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersCSW67: The Nordics are ready to push for gender equality
  6. Promote UkraineInvitation to the National Demonstration in solidarity with Ukraine on 25.02.2023

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Azerbaijan Embassy9th Southern Gas Corridor Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting and 1st Green Energy Advisory Council Ministerial Meeting
  2. EFBWWEU Social Dialogue review – publication of the European Commission package and joint statement of ETUFs
  3. Oxfam InternationalPan Africa Program Progress Report 2022 - Post Covid and Beyond
  4. WWFWWF Living Planet Report
  5. Europan Patent OfficeHydrogen patents for a clean energy future: A global trend analysis of innovation along hydrogen value chains

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us