Wednesday

25th May 2022

Weapons to Ukraine? It may be too late

  • View through Ukrainian artillery gun sight in east Ukraine in 2014 (Photo: Christopher Bobyn)
Listen to article

Ukraine sought fresh supplies of weapons from EU countries on Thursday (24 February) in the immediate aftermath of a Russian invasion amid concerns that shipments of lethal aid would be too late and could help spark wider conflict.

Ukraine's foreign affairs minister, Dmytro Kuleba, has repeatedly called on the European Union and Western allies to transfer weapons and military technologies to Kyiv.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Become an expert on Europe

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

That has been met with a "no" in some member states.

Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán said bluntly on Wednesday on Facebook that his country will not send soldiers or weapons to Ukraine.

The Belgian government took a similar position — although the Benelux country is expected to send protective equipment like helmets or binoculars for military forces.

Meanwhile, other countries such as Finland and Lithuania seemed more open to strengthening Ukraine's military power.

But weapons shipments may not be much of a quick fix for Ukraine in the face of an integrated and well-equipped invasion force like Russia's.

Dan Smith, director of the think tank Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, said there was the practical concern, that if new equipment and weapons are provided to Ukraine forces, "it will take them time before they are able to use" them.

At the same time, a lack of a response from the West would make Ukraine feel completely "isolated and abandoned," said Smith, warning that such a stance could have a demoralising effect.

'Too late now'

"The problem is that considerably altering the stakes in this game is too late now," Gustav Gressel from the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) said Wednesday in a podcast.

Like Smith, he warned that giving Ukraine complex weapons systems, and filling in gaps in Ukrainian capabilities would require logistical preparations, technical adjustments and training — something that can take months and even years.

"We have wasted eight years discussing weapons deliveries while not doing so," he added.

Highlighting a sense that the time had already passed where the EU could really help fortify Ukraine was the comment, posted to Twitter on Thursday, from Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, a former German defence minister once tapped to succeed Angela Merkel as chancellor.

"I'm so angry at ourselves for our historical failure," she wrote, referring to a failure to deter Russian president Vladimir Putin.

Strategists in Europe had forgotten that "we have to be militarily strong enough to make non-negotiation not an option for the other side," she wrote.

Any arms export decisions are expected to be made bilaterally between Ukraine and EU member states, the experts said, and any decision on arming Ukraine in the current circumstances will be politically risky.

"If the EU members appear too distant and too weak in the way they support Ukraine, their image could be damaged for many years," said Yannick Queau, the director of the Brussels-based think tank Group for Research and Information on Peace and Security.

Yet delivering arms to the Ukrainian military forces could also be "really dangerous," he said.

Shipping weapons to Ukraine could raise the temperature even more between Russia and Nato and, besides, the weapons could end up in the hands of Russian forces, Queau added.

The Baltics

Asked if Russia could use its nuclear capabilities, Smith said that there was always a risk but "this is very unlikely".

Those weapons are more of a deterrent to the West than anything else.

"Russia uses its nuclear power in order to avoid any direct involvement from Nato in Ukraine," Queau said.

Moreover, both Russia and Nato had the incentive to avoid a direct military confrontation precisely because that would invite the kind of escalation that made nuclear conflict more likely, he said.

Nonetheless, he said, Nato had to strengthen the borders of Poland, Romania and the Baltic states.

As for Britain, it pledged this week to provide military support to Ukraine in the coming days, including "defensive weapons and non-lethal aid." The UK had already started supplying Kyiv with anti-armour defensive and anti-tank weapons in mid-January.

Washington, for its part, has also sent at least two shipments of military aid, including weapons and ammunition to Ukraine.

This article was updated on 25 February to add a reference to Lithuania as one of the countries open to sending additional support to Ukraine

Tusk turns on former partners over Ukraine 'disgrace'

Donald Tusk, the Polish president of the EU Council until 2019 and current chair of the European People's Party broke with normal diplomatic niceties to lambast Germany, Hungary and Italy as having "disgraced themselves."

EU plans to jointly invest in defence capabilities

EU countries need to refill stockpiles after several member states supplied weapons to Ukraine in its fight with Russia, and to phase out existing Soviet-era weapons systems, and reinforce air defence.

Opinion

West doing too little, too late over Russia's aggression

To think that Russian companies could until Friday count on spare parts for armed aircrafts, or semiconductors, or oil products, from Europe, as their country was fuelling the most dangerous security crisis since World War Two, is beyond comprehension.

Opinion

When Reagan met Gorbachev — a history lesson for Putin

Neither Reagan nor Gorbachev achieved their goal at the famous Reykjavik summit of 1986. Despite that fact there are lessons that current leaders — particularly Vladimir Putin — could adopt from these two iconic leaders.

Opinion

Orbán's overtures to Moscow are distasteful and detrimental

Some Western European politicians are reviving the chimera of a negotiated settlement. None of this makes the current, half-hearted approach towards sanctioning Russia look better — nor does it shed any favourable light on the cravenness of Hungary's current government.

News in Brief

  1. Johnson refuses to resign after Downing Street parties report
  2. EU border police has over 2,000 agents deployed
  3. Dutch tax authorities to admit to institutional racism
  4. Rutte calls for EU pension and labour reforms
  5. France 'convinced' Ukraine will join EU
  6. Von der Leyen: Russia hoarding food as 'blackmail'
  7. Legal action launched against KLM over 'greenwashing'
  8. Orbán refuses to discuss Russia oil embargo at EU summit

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic delegation visits Nordic Bridges in Canada
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersClear to proceed - green shipping corridors in the Nordic Region
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic ministers agree on international climate commitments
  4. UNESDA - SOFT DRINKS EUROPEEfficient waste collection schemes, closed-loop recycling and access to recycled content are crucial to transition to a circular economy in Europe
  5. UiPathNo digital future for the EU without Intelligent Automation? Online briefing Link

Latest News

  1. Orbán's new state of emergency under fire
  2. EU parliament prevaricates on barring Russian lobbyists
  3. Ukraine lawyer enlists EU watchdog against Russian oil
  4. Right of Reply: Hungarian government
  5. When Reagan met Gorbachev — a history lesson for Putin
  6. Orbán oil veto to deface EU summit on Ukraine
  7. France aims for EU minimum-tax deal in June
  8. 'No progress in years' in Libya, says UN migration body

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us