Thursday

28th Mar 2024

Letter

Right of Reply: The EU and Sudan

  • EU Commission HQ, the Berlaymont building (Photo: European Commission)

Dear Editor,

Concerning the opinion article Sudan asylum decision signals Dutch moral collapse, written by Chris Klein and published on the 24 August in your online newspaper, we would like to rebut statements made in this article and signal that it contains factual mistakes and misleading statements about the use of EU funds in Sudan.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Get the EU news that really matters

Instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

The article, namely, affirms that EU money has been used to halt migration by channelling funds to the RSF for border controls.

In light of this, we would like to call to your attention the fact that this piece is spreading false information on the use of EU funds in Sudan.

Please find our clarification below:

• The civilian-led transitional government of Sudan is the first government in Sudan to receive EU funds, in a technical assistance modality.

• The EU did not provide any financial support to the Government of Sudan during Omar al-Bashir's regime. The same applies to the Transitional Military Council (TMC) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) of the Sudanese military.

• All EU-funded activities in Sudan are implemented by EU member states development agencies, UN, international organisations and NGOs who are closely scrutinised through strict and regular monitoring during projects' implementation.

• Furthermore, EU's implementing partners exert strict control over the funds disbursed and are closely scrutinised by the EU Delegation through close and regular monitoring.

• The main beneficiaries of EU support are vulnerable populations in peripheral areas of the country and in Khartoum, in particular refugees, IDPs, returnees, the local communities hosting them, and migrants.

• Under the Emergency Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF), both the BMM programme and the Regional Operational Centre (ROCK) have been working with the ministry of interior of the beneficiary countries, including police and civil servants in charge of checking and verifying administrative documents of people, vehicles and goods. Please note the difference between border control and border security. Border control relates to control and verification of administrative documents for people, vehicles and goods. Border security relates to physical patrols. The latter are military missions and the EU is not involved and does not support them.

• The Rapid Support Forces, being part of the military, do not benefit from any kind of EU support. The EU does not train or provide any support to the military or militias.

More detailed information can be found here.

Best regards

Gesine Knolle

Press Officer for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, EU Commission

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this opinion piece are the author's, not those of EUobserver.

Sudan asylum decision signals Dutch moral collapse

Dutch decision to start deporting Sudanese refugees despite atrocious violence in their home country disfigures the notion of the Netherlands being one of the more progressive societies on earth.

EU Modernisation Fund: an open door for fossil gas in Romania

Among the largest sources of financing for energy transition of central and eastern European countries, the €60bn Modernisation Fund remains far from the public eye. And perhaps that's one reason it is often used for financing fossil gas projects.

Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Rather than assuming a pro-European Labour government in London will automatically open doors in Brussels, the Labour party needs to consider what it may be able to offer to incentivise EU leaders to factor the UK into their defence thinking.

Column

EU's Gaza policy: boon for dictators, bad for democrats

While they woo dictators and autocrats, EU policymakers are becoming ever more estranged from the world's democrats. The real tragedy is the erosion of one of Europe's key assets: its huge reserves of soft power, writes Shada Islam.

Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult

Rather than assuming a pro-European Labour government in London will automatically open doors in Brussels, the Labour party needs to consider what it may be able to offer to incentivise EU leaders to factor the UK into their defence thinking.

Column

EU's Gaza policy: boon for dictators, bad for democrats

While they woo dictators and autocrats, EU policymakers are becoming ever more estranged from the world's democrats. The real tragedy is the erosion of one of Europe's key assets: its huge reserves of soft power, writes Shada Islam.

Latest News

  1. German bank freezes account of Jewish peace group
  2. EU Modernisation Fund: an open door for fossil gas in Romania
  3. 'Swiftly dial back' interest rates, ECB told
  4. Moscow's terror attack, security and Gaza
  5. Why UK-EU defence and security deal may be difficult
  6. EU unveils plan to create a European cross-border degree
  7. How migrants risk becoming drug addicts along Balkan route
  8. 2024: A Space Odyssey — why the galaxy needs regulating

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. Nordic Council of MinistersJoin the Nordic Food Systems Takeover at COP28
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersHow women and men are affected differently by climate policy
  3. Nordic Council of MinistersArtist Jessie Kleemann at Nordic pavilion during UN climate summit COP28
  4. Nordic Council of MinistersCOP28: Gathering Nordic and global experts to put food and health on the agenda
  5. Friedrich Naumann FoundationPoems of Liberty – Call for Submission “Human Rights in Inhume War”: 250€ honorary fee for selected poems
  6. World BankWorld Bank report: How to create a future where the rewards of technology benefit all levels of society?

Join EUobserver

EU news that matters

Join us