Friday

10th Apr 2020

Feature

Dutch case opens new era for climate-change litigation

  • Legal action on climate change - against both governments and corporations - is set to grow considerably in the next few years (Photo: Gwenael Piaser)

Over the past few years, an increasing number of citizens and NGOs have started taking legal action to hold governments and corporations accountable for failing to address the climate crisis.

Last year, 2019, a Berlin court ruled on the first-ever climate litigation case against the German government for failing to meet its own 2020 climate target.

Read and decide

Join EUobserver today

Support quality EU news

Get instant access to all articles — and 20 years of archives. 14-day free trial.

... or subscribe as a group

Even though the case was dismissed, the court ruled that people's fundamental rights can be violated by the consequences of climate change.

Similar cases have been brought to Irish or Italian courts, and even to the European Court of Justice.

Yet, evidence on the actual impacts of climate-change litigation is still rather inconclusive.

But a recent ruling of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands has set a precedent in climate legal action, as it established that the Dutch government has the legal duty to prevent dangerous climate change on the basis of fundamental rights.

In 2013, the Dutch environmental foundation Urgenda, on behalf of around 900 citizens, sued the state for the government's failure to take responsibility for the Netherlands' contribution to the climate crisis.

The Urgenda case

In this landmark decision, the court ruled on 20 December that current Dutch policies were inadequate, forcing the Dutch government to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by at least 25 percent (compared to the 1990 levels) by the end of 2020.

Although in global terms, the Dutch are not major polluters, per capita the Netherlands has the fourth-highest CO2 emissions in the EU, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) - after Luxembourg, Estonia and the Czech Republic.

And the small but densely-populated country is also home to oil giant Shell and has abundant natural gas reserves.

But the court ruling establishes that even minor contributors to climate change must take responsibility.

The ruling was based specifically on the right to life and well-being under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) - articles 2 and 8.

Greenpeace called the decision "an immense victory for climate justice"

Additionally, the ruling marks the first successful climate change action founded on private (tort) law - as well as the first time that a court has determined the appropriate emissions-reduction target for a developed state, according to Roger Cox, who was the lead lawyer on the case.

By coincidence, the decision on the Urgenda case came a few days after the European Commission presented the new Green Deal to achieve climate neutrality by 2050.

But, it also came less than a month after the UN Environment Programme confirmed that collective ambition must increase more than 500 percent over current levels to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement.

Governments vs Corporations

Legal action related to climate change is set to grow considerably in the next few years as a tool to strengthen climate action.

According to a recent report, the majority of defendants until now have been governments. But lawsuits are increasingly targeting the biggest emitters and polluting companies.

In the Netherlands, the Urgenda case also encouraged other campaigners to take legal action against polluting cooperations.

Last April, a group of social and environmental justice groups led by the NGO Friends of the Earth Netherlands began the process of suing Shell "to legally compel the company to cease its destruction of the climate".

According to a campaigner from Friends of the Earth International, Sara Shaw, leaked internal company documents from the 1990s already predicted that environmental organisations would start suing Shell for causing climate change.

The NGO foresees that if the court case is successful, Shell might be forced to reduce its CO2 emissions by 45 percent by 2030, compared to 2010 levels.

However, according to Cox, "climate cases brought against national governments appear to have better chances of success than lawsuits brought against the fossil fuel sector [because] a scientific basis has been established and governments have acknowledged the need to achieve a certain amount of reduction within a certain period of time".

Timmermans warns on cost of inaction on climate

The Green Deal commissioner, Frans Timmermans, said the costs of inaction in climate policy are "tremendously high". However, it is still unclear if member states will unanimously agree on the EU's 2050 climate-neutrality goal at next week's summit.

Commission's €1 trillion bet on green deal financing

The European Commission unveiled on Tuesday its sustainable investment plan to put Europe on track to reach the 2050 emissions-neutrality goal - while helping coal-producing regions to move away from fossil fuels.

Europeans ready to 'green' their lifestyles, study finds

Two-thirds of people in Europe, the US and China think their individual behaviour can help tackle climate change - but Europeans and Chinese are more willing to change their living standards to limit global warming than Americans.

News in Brief

  1. Migrants trapped on boat in Tripoli due to shelling
  2. EU anti-crisis budget 'could be up to €1.5 trillion'
  3. Western Balkan states appeal for EU help with masks
  4. Spain's lockdown could be extended until 10 May
  5. IMF: Pandemic crisis will be worse than great depression
  6. German economy minister expects progress on EU deal
  7. Italian PM: EU is at risk if no deal on recovery plan
  8. Belgian region to block EU Green Deal

What will Brexit mean for climate action in EU and UK?

The UK is leaving the EU after playing a key role in climate action - just as COP26 comes to Glasgow. With so many policy negotiations ahead, a split between London and Brussels post-Brexit could undermine the 2050 emissions-neutrality goal.

Timmermans: EU climate law will 'discipline' rogue states

The first EU-wide climate law will be a "disciplining" exercise to implement the Green Deal - although the Polish climate minister Michal Kurtyka warned the EU Commission about the social cost of delivering the green transition.

Stakeholders' Highlights

  1. UNESDAMaking Europe’s Economy Circular – the time is now
  2. Nordic Council of MinistersScottish parliament seeks closer collaboration with the Nordic Council
  3. UNESDAFrom Linear to Circular – check out UNESDA's new blog
  4. Nordic Council of Ministers40 years of experience have proven its point: Sustainable financing actually works
  5. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic and Baltic ministers paving the way for 5G in the region
  6. Nordic Council of MinistersEarmarked paternity leave – an effective way to change norms

Latest News

  1. How the EU's virus-alert agency failed
  2. Flemish nationalists torpedo Belgium Green Deal pledge
  3. Eurozone agreed €500bn cushion against virus blow
  4. Why Europe must act now, and on a big scale
  5. EU court blocks Poland's bid to 'frighten' judges
  6. Coronavirus sees approval-rating soar for EU leaders
  7. EU science chief who 'quit' had been told to resign
  8. EU delays 'exit strategies' plan, as WHO urges caution

Join EUobserver

Support quality EU news

Join us